INCREASE TOBACCO TAX
House Bill 4389
Sponsor: Rep. Coleman Young
Committee: Tax Policy
Complete to 3-27-07
A SUMMARY OF HOUSE BILL 4389 AS INTRODUCED 3-1-07
The bill is intended to implement Governor Granholm's proposal to increase the tax on cigarettes from $2.00 per pack to $2.05 per pack and to double the tax on other tobacco products from 32 percent of the wholesale price to 64 percent of the wholesale price. This proposal accompanied the FY 2007-08 Executive Budget Recommendation.
The proposal also intends to direct the increase in revenues to the Medicaid Benefits Trust Fund and hold the other funding recipients from tobacco taxes harmless from any resulting reduction in revenue due to decreased consumption.
[As introduced, however, the bill would increase the tax on cigarettes from $2.00 per pack to $2.005 per pack. It increases the cigarette tax by one-quarter of one mill (0.25) rather than by 2.5 mills. The introduced version also directs increased revenues to the General Fund rather than the Medicaid Benefits Trust Fund. It is expected that technical amendments will be made to the bill to implement the Governor's proposal.]
The bill would amend the Tobacco Products Tax Act to increase the excise tax on cigars, cigarettes, noncigarette smoking tobacco, and smokeless tobacco beginning June 1, 2007. The bill would also require licensees and retailers to pay the additional tax for any inventory on hand as of June 1, 2007.
Also, the bill provides that the current 32% tax on other tobacco products would remain in place through May 30, 2007, and the 64% tax would take effect June 1, 2007. The bill would need to be amended to extend the current 32% tax to May 31, 2007.
MCL 205.427 and 205.432
FISCAL IMPACT:
House bill 4389 is part of the executive recommendation. This bill would increase tobacco tax revenue by an estimated $18.1 million in FY 2006-07 and $57.6 million in FY 2007-08. The estimate assumes a decline of 0.5% in consumption of packs of cigarettes and a 10.3% decline in the consumption of other tobacco products. Under the executive recommendation, this revenue would be earmarked to the Medicaid Benefits Trust Fund and the other funds that receive tobacco tax revenue would be held harmless. Technical changes will be needed to ensure that the bill corresponds to the executive recommendation.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Executive Budget presentation states, "The current tax rate on other tobacco products (OTP) is 32 percent of the wholesale price – which is significantly lower than the current tax rate on cigarettes. The cigarette tax of $2 per pack averages between 80 and 150 percent of the wholesale price on a percentage basis, depending on whether the cigarettes are a premium or a discount brand. This significant tax differential has created an incentive for consumers to substitute tobacco products taxed as OTP for cigarettes. In addition, manufacturers have created new products that share many of the characteristics of cigarettes (white wrapping paper, filters, and packs of 20) but are sold as 'little cigars.' These products have a considerable price advantage due to the different tax rates assessed on OTP compared to cigarettes, and it appears these little cigars have experienced increased sales while cigarette sales have declined."
History of Tobacco Tax Rates
The state's cigarette tax dates back to the enactment of 1947 PA 265, which first imposed at tax of 1.5 mills per cigarette (3¢ per pack). Over the next several decades, the tax rate remained relatively low; by 1988, the rate had reached 12.5 mills per cigarette (25¢/pack). Since 1994, the tax rate has been increased numerous times. The Tobacco Products Act, part of Proposal A of 1994, tripled the tax to 37.5 mills per cigarette (75¢/pack). The act also imposed a tax of 16% of the wholesale price of other tobacco products. Since passage of Proposal A, the tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products has increased twice, most recently in 2004.
Cigarette Taxes |
Other Tobacco Products |
|||
Public Act |
Mills/Cigarette |
$/Pack |
Public Act |
% of Wholesale Price |
1947 PA 265 |
1.5 |
$0.03 |
||
1959 PA 274 |
2.0 |
$0.04 |
||
1961 PA 156 |
2.5 |
$0.05 |
||
1962 PA 215 |
3.5 |
$0.07 |
||
1970 PA 11 |
5.5 |
$0.11 |
||
1982 PA 73 |
10.5 |
$0.21 |
||
1987 PA 219 |
12.5 |
$0.25 |
||
1993 PA 327 |
37.5 |
$0.75 |
1993 PA 327 |
16% |
2002 PA 503 |
62.5 |
$1.25 |
2002 PA 503 |
20% |
2004 PA 164 |
100.0 |
$2.00 |
2004 PA 164 |
32% |
Source: Citizens Research Council: Outline of theMichigan Tax System (January 2007)
State Excise Tax Rates on Cigarettes
State |
Rate (¢/pack) |
Rank |
State |
Rate (¢/pack) |
Rank |
New Jersey |
257.5 |
1 |
New Hampshire |
80 |
26 |
Rhode Island |
246 |
2 |
Kansas |
79 |
28 |
Washington |
202.5 |
3 |
Wisconsin |
77 |
29 |
Arizona |
200 |
4 |
Utah |
69.5 |
30 |
Maine |
200 |
4 |
Nebraska |
64 |
31 |
MICHIGAN |
200 |
4 |
Wyoming |
60 |
32 |
Alaska |
180 |
7 |
Arkansas |
59 |
33 |
Vermont |
179 |
8 |
Idaho |
57 |
34 |
Montana |
170 |
9 |
Indiana |
55.5 |
35 |
Hawaii |
160 |
10 |
Delaware |
55 |
36 |
Connecticut |
151 |
11 |
West Virginia |
55 |
36 |
Massachusetts |
151 |
11 |
South Dakota |
53 |
38 |
New York |
150 |
13 |
North Dakota |
44 |
39 |
Texas |
141 |
14 |
Alabama |
42.5 |
40 |
Pennsylvania |
135 |
15 |
Georgia |
37 |
41 |
Ohio |
125 |
16 |
Iowa |
36 |
42 |
Minnesota |
123 |
17 |
Louisiana |
36 |
42 |
Oregon |
118 |
18 |
North Carolina |
35 |
44 |
Oklahoma |
103 |
19 |
Florida |
33.9 |
45 |
Dist. of Columbia |
100 |
20 |
Kentucky |
30 |
46 |
Maryland |
100 |
20 |
Virginia |
30 |
46 |
Illinois. |
98 |
22 |
Tennessee |
20 |
48 |
New Mexico |
91 |
23 |
Mississippi |
18 |
49 |
California |
87 |
24 |
Missouri |
17 |
50 |
Colorado |
84 |
25 |
South Carolina |
7 |
51 |
Nevada |
80 |
26 |
U. S. Median |
80 |
Source: Federation of Tax Administrators (January 1, 2007)
1. Counties and cities may impose an additional per pack tax in AL (1¢-6¢); IL (10¢-15¢); MO (4¢-7¢); NYC ($1.50); TN (1¢); and VA (2¢-15¢)
2. Dealers pay an additional enforcement and administrative fee of 0.1¢ per pack in KY and 0.05¢ in TN.
3. Tax rate is scheduled to increase to $2./pack on7/1/2007 in AK and on 9/30/2007 in HI.
4. Minnesota also adds a 25.5¢ sales tax on to the wholesale price of a tax stamp.
5. Michigan, Minnesota, andUtah also impose a 35¢ "equity assessment" on the cigarettes of manufacturers that did not participate in the tobacco settlement.
Distribution of Cigarette Tax Revenue
Mills |
$/Pack |
% |
|
||||||
General Fund |
19.7625 |
$0.40 |
19.7625% |
|
|||||
School Aid Fund |
41.62 |
$0.83 |
41.6200% |
|
|||||
HealthyMichigan Fund |
3.75 |
$0.08 |
3.7500% |
|
|||||
Health and Safety Fund |
2.4375 |
$0.05 |
2.4375% |
|
|||||
Medicaid Benefits Trust Fund |
31.875 |
$0.64 |
31.8750% |
|
|||||
WayneCounty |
0.555 |
$0.01 |
0.5550% |
|
|||||
Total |
100 |
$2.00 |
100.0000% |
|
|||||
|
Total Mills |
% |
Mills |
||||||
|
1993 PA 327 |
37.5 |
6.5% |
2.4375 |
Health and Safety Fund |
||||
|
24.1% |
9.0375 |
General Fund |
||||||
|
63.4% |
23.775 |
School Aid Fund |
||||||
|
6.0% |
2.25 |
HealthyMichigan Fund |
||||||
|
|||||||||
|
2002 PA 503 |
15.0 |
9.0% |
1.35 |
General Fund |
||||
|
56.3% |
8.445 |
School Aid Fund |
||||||
|
6.0% |
0.9 |
HealthyMichigan Fund |
||||||
|
3.7% |
0.555 |
WayneCounty |
||||||
|
25.0% |
3.75 |
Medicaid Benefits Trust Fund |
||||||
|
|||||||||
|
2002 PA 503 |
10.0 |
94.0% |
9.4 |
School Aid Fund |
||||
|
6.0% |
0.6 |
HealthyMichigan Fund |
||||||
|
|||||||||
|
2004 PA 164 |
37.5 |
75.0% |
28.125 |
Medicaid Benefits Trust Fund |
||||
|
25.0% |
9.375 |
General Fund |
||||||
|
100.0% |
37.5 |
|||||||
Legislative Analyst: Mark Wolf
Fiscal Analyst: Rebecca Ross
Jim Stansell
■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.