NEIGHBORHOOD ENTERPRISE ZONE EXCEPTION

House Bill 5550

Sponsor:  Rep. Coleman Young

Committee:  Commerce

Complete to12-1-08

A SUMMARY OF HOUSE BILL 5550 AS INTRODUCED12-11-07

The bill would amend the Neighborhood Enterprise Zone Act (MCL 207.774) so that a property tax abatement could be awarded for an exceptional case.

The Neighborhood Enterprise Zone Act was enacted in 1992 as an effort to improve the housing stock in certain "distressed" urban communities.  The act offers reduced property taxes to residential property owners in certain zones designated by eligible local units of government (known as core communities).  Generally speaking, owners of new construction pay taxes at the rate of one-half the statewide average property tax rate and owners of rehabilitated housing pay taxes based on the value of residential property prior to rehabilitation.  The abatement applies to structures and not to land.  Property owners who obtain a neighborhood enterprise zone certificate are exempt from standard property taxes and instead pay a specific tax known as the neighborhood enterprise zone tax.  The abatements are available from6 to 15 years. 

Generally, the act requires an application for a certificate to be filed before a building permit is issued for the new construction or rehabilitation of the facility, but a number of exceptions to this requirement have been added to the statute since its enactment.

House Bill 5550 would amend the Neighborhood Enterprise Zone Act to add a new exception.  It would allow an application for a NEZ certificate to be filed after a building permit for the construction of a new facility if the area in which the facility is located was designated as a neighborhood enterprise zone by the governing body of a local governmental unit in January 2005 and if the building permit was issued for that facility in December 2004.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The bill would potentially reduce state and local property tax revenue by an indeterminate amount by granting eligibility to an additional specific facility.  State School Aid Fund (SAF) expenditures would increase by an unknown amount to replace lost tax revenue for school operating purposes in order to maintain guaranteed per-pupil funding amounts. The actual amount of reduction in tax revenues and the resulting increase in SAF expenditures would depend upon the characteristics of the specific affected property.

                                                                                           Legislative Analyst:   Chris Couch

                                                                                                   Fiscal Analyst:  ViolaBay Wild

■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.