SENATE BILL No. 1275

 

 

April 24, 2008, Introduced by Senator KUIPERS and referred to the Committee on Education.

 

 

 

     A bill to amend 1979 PA 94, entitled

 

"The state school aid act of 1979,"

 

by amending section 22b (MCL 388.1622b), as amended by 2007 PA 137,

 

and by adding section 42.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 22b. (1) From the appropriation in section 11, there is

 

allocated an amount not to exceed $3,722,000,000.00 for 2007-2008

 

for discretionary nonmandated payments to districts under this

 

section. Funds allocated under this section that are not expended

 

in the state fiscal year for which they were allocated, as

 

determined by the department, may be used to supplement the

 

allocations under sections 22a and 51c in order to fully fund those

 

calculated allocations for the same fiscal year.


 

     (2) Subject to subsection (3) and section 11, the allocation

 

to a district under this section shall be an amount equal to the

 

sum of the amounts calculated under sections 20, 20j, 51a(2),

 

51a(3), and 51a(12), minus the sum of the allocations to the

 

district under sections 22a and 51c.

 

     (3) In order to receive an allocation under this section, each

 

district shall do all of the following:

 

     (a) Administer in each grade level that it operates in grades

 

1 to 5 a standardized assessment approved by the department of

 

grade-appropriate basic educational skills. A district may use the

 

Michigan literacy progress profile to satisfy this requirement for

 

grades 1 to 3. Also, if the revised school code is amended to

 

require annual assessments at additional grade levels, in order to

 

receive an allocation under this section each district shall comply

 

with that requirement.

 

     (b) Comply with sections 1278a and 1278b of the revised school

 

code, MCL 380.1278a and 380.1278b.

 

     (c) Furnish data and other information required by state and

 

federal law to the center and the department in the form and manner

 

specified by the center or the department, as applicable.

 

     (d) Comply with section 1230g of the revised school code, MCL

 

380.1230g.

 

     (e) If the district is a district that is subject to section

 

42, comply with that section by expending the amount of the funds

 

it receives under this section necessary to provide the

 

intervention program required under that section.

 

     (4) Districts are encouraged to use funds allocated under this


 

section for the purchase and support of payroll, human resources,

 

and other business function software that is compatible with that

 

of the intermediate district in which the district is located and

 

with other districts located within that intermediate district.

 

     (5) From the allocation in subsection (1), the department

 

shall pay up to $1,000,000.00 in litigation costs incurred by this

 

state associated with lawsuits filed by 1 or more districts or

 

intermediate districts against this state. If the allocation under

 

this section is insufficient to fully fund all payments required

 

under this section, the payments under this subsection shall be

 

made in full before any proration of remaining payments under this

 

section.

 

     (6) It is the intent of the legislature that all

 

constitutional obligations of this state have been fully funded

 

under sections 22a, 31d, 51a, and 51c. If a claim is made by an

 

entity receiving funds under this act that challenges the

 

legislative determination of the adequacy of this funding or

 

alleges that there exists an unfunded constitutional requirement,

 

the state budget director may escrow or allocate from the

 

discretionary funds for nonmandated payments under this section the

 

amount as may be necessary to satisfy the claim before making any

 

payments to districts under subsection (2). If funds are escrowed,

 

the escrowed funds are a work project appropriation and the funds

 

are carried forward into the following fiscal year. The purpose of

 

the work project is to provide for any payments that may be awarded

 

to districts as a result of litigation. The work project shall be

 

completed upon resolution of the litigation.


 

     (7) If the local claims review board or a court of competent

 

jurisdiction makes a final determination that this state is in

 

violation of section 29 of article IX of the state constitution of

 

1963 regarding state payments to districts, the state budget

 

director shall use work project funds under subsection (6) or

 

allocate from the discretionary funds for nonmandated payments

 

under this section the amount as may be necessary to satisfy the

 

amount owed to districts before making any payments to districts

 

under subsection (2).

 

     (8) If a claim is made in court that challenges the

 

legislative determination of the adequacy of funding for this

 

state's constitutional obligations or alleges that there exists an

 

unfunded constitutional requirement, any interested party may seek

 

an expedited review of the claim by the local claims review board.

 

If the claim exceeds $10,000,000.00, this state may remove the

 

action to the court of appeals, and the court of appeals shall have

 

and shall exercise jurisdiction over the claim.

 

     (9) If payments resulting from a final determination by the

 

local claims review board or a court of competent jurisdiction that

 

there has been a violation of section 29 of article IX of the state

 

constitution of 1963 exceed the amount allocated for discretionary

 

nonmandated payments under this section, the legislature shall

 

provide for adequate funding for this state's constitutional

 

obligations at its next legislative session.

 

     (10) If a lawsuit challenging payments made to districts

 

related to costs reimbursed by federal title XIX medicaid funds is

 

filed against this state, then, for the purpose of addressing


 

potential liability under such a lawsuit, the state budget director

 

may place funds allocated under this section in escrow or allocate

 

money from the funds otherwise allocated under this section, up to

 

a maximum of 50% of the amount allocated in subsection (1). If

 

funds are placed in escrow under this subsection, those funds are a

 

work project appropriation and the funds are carried forward into

 

the following fiscal year. The purpose of the work project is to

 

provide for any payments that may be awarded to districts as a

 

result of the litigation. The work project shall be completed upon

 

resolution of the litigation. In addition, this state reserves the

 

right to terminate future federal title XIX medicaid reimbursement

 

payments to districts if the amount or allocation of reimbursed

 

funds is challenged in the lawsuit. As used in this subsection,

 

"title XIX" means title XIX of the social security act, 42 USC 1396

 

to 1396v.

 

     (11) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated

 

for 2007-2008 only an amount not to exceed $40,000.00 for payment

 

to a district that meets all of the following:

 

     (a) Had a membership of less than 900 pupils for 2006-2007.

 

     (b) Is located in an intermediate district that had a taxable

 

value per membership pupil, as defined in section 22a, of greater

 

than $290,000.00 for 2006-2007.

 

     (c) The school electors of the district voted in the

 

affirmative on May 8, 2007 to restore a millage reduction required

 

under section 31 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963,

 

but the district was later found to have an incorrect millage

 

reduction fraction as defined in section 34d of the general


 

property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.34d.

 

     Sec. 42. (1) A district that is subject to this section shall

 

use the amount of the funds it receives under section 22b necessary

 

to provide a program for the purposes of providing enhanced

 

instructional services, periodic screenings, and early intervening

 

services as described in this section; improving the literacy

 

skills of students in grades K to 3 so that they are reading at

 

grade level as soon as possible; and preventing inappropriate or

 

unnecessary referrals to special education services. A district is

 

subject to this section if the district operates at least 1

 

elementary school that has been determined by the department to be

 

in phase 2 or above of the corrective measures required for schools

 

that are determined to not meet the adequate yearly progress

 

standard in English language arts under the no child left behind

 

act of 2001, Public Law 107-110.

 

     (2) A program provided under this section shall meet all of

 

the following:

 

     (a) Shall provide in each elementary school described in

 

subsection (1) a comprehensive, age-appropriate language arts

 

curriculum that helps ensure that pupils meet the grade level

 

content expectations developed by the department in English

 

language arts for the grade level in which the pupils are enrolled.

 

     (b) Shall be designed to include active and continuous

 

involvement of the parents or guardians of the pupils participating

 

in the program.

 

     (c) Shall provide all pupils in grades K to 3 in the

 

elementary school with 60 to 90 minutes of reading instruction per


 

school day using a core comprehensive reading program that is

 

research-based. The reading instruction must include phonemic

 

awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension, and

 

oral language and writing taught in a combination of entire class

 

setting, small group settings, and individual practice.

 

     (d) Shall regularly measure pupils' literacy skills in all of

 

grades K to 3 in the elementary school. Screenings shall be

 

conducted schoolwide at least 3 times per school year in each of

 

grades K to 3, shall screen for learning difficulty and to

 

determine whether a pupil is meeting applicable basic literacy

 

benchmarks for his or her grade level, and shall be conducted using

 

a research-based screening tool that is proven reliable and valid.

 

     (e) If a pupil is determined by the screening under

 

subdivision (d) to need further intervention because the screening

 

reveals that the pupil is not meeting applicable basic literacy

 

benchmarks for his or her grade level, then the program shall

 

provide the pupil with at least 30 minutes of reading instruction

 

per school day in addition to the instruction required under

 

subdivision (c). This reading instruction shall be of the same type

 

as described in subdivision (c), except that it shall be taught in

 

a combination of small group settings and individual practice.

 

Further, the program shall ensure that these pupils are rescreened

 

through progress monitoring at least every 2 to 4 weeks.

 

     (f) If a pupil receiving additional intervention under

 

subdivision (e) is determined by the program screening to still not

 

be meeting applicable basic literacy benchmarks for his or her

 

grade level, then the program shall provide the pupil with at least


 

30 more minutes of reading instruction per school day in addition

 

to the instruction required under subdivisions (c) and (d). This

 

reading instruction shall be of the same type as described in

 

subdivision (c), except that it shall be taught in a combination of

 

small group settings and individual practice.

 

     (g) If a pupil in grades K to 3 has been determined to not

 

meet applicable basic literacy benchmarks for his or her grade

 

level, then by the end of the first semester or trimester, or as

 

early as is practicable for parents to assist in the pupil's

 

academic improvement, whichever is earlier, the program shall

 

provide for a written notice to the pupil's parent or legal

 

guardian. The notice shall include all of the following:

 

     (i) Notification that the pupil's school has determined that

 

the child has failed to meet standards for basic literacy skills,

 

based on the grade level content expectations in English language

 

arts established by the department for the pupil's grade level.

 

     (ii) Notification as to the specific role the parent or

 

guardian can play at home to improve the pupil's literacy skills,

 

including at least any extra work that the parent or guardian can

 

do with the pupil and a description of varied approaches to

 

completing homework or extra work in order to help raise the

 

reading skill level of the pupil.

 

     (iii) If the pupil is enrolled in a school that is required to

 

provide supplemental services under the federal no child left

 

behind act of 2001, Public Law 107-110, notification that the

 

pupil's parent or legal guardian has a right to receive

 

reimbursement for the pupil to receive services from a supplemental


 

service provider identified by the department and that the pupil's

 

parent or legal guardian may choose to have the pupil receive

 

supplemental services from 1 of these providers with reimbursement

 

from the school district or public school academy. This part of the

 

notice shall include a listing of the supplemental service

 

providers that are identified by the department under section 1283

 

of the revised school code, MCL 380.1283, and that are located

 

within a 30-mile radius of the pupil's school.

 

     (h) The program shall provide a copy of the notice required

 

under subdivision (g) to the department, and the department shall

 

maintain a copy of this notice.

 

     (i) The program shall do all of the following with regard to

 

pupils in later grades:

 

     (i) Shall rescreen pupils in grades 6 and 8 using the MEAP

 

English language arts assessments for those grades. This

 

rescreening in grade 6 shall begin in 2011-2012 and in grade 8

 

shall begin in 2013-2014, and shall be done for all pupils in these

 

grades who were determined by the screening in grade 3 to require

 

additional intervention under subdivision (f) or who have enrolled

 

in the school for the first time after grade 3.

 

     (ii) If a pupil did not achieve level I or II on the MEAP

 

English language arts assessment, shall provide at least 30 minutes

 

of reading instruction per school day in addition to the pupil's

 

regular English language arts instruction. This reading instruction

 

shall be of the same type as described in subdivision (c), except

 

that it shall be taught in a combination of small group settings

 

and individual practice. Further, the program shall ensure that


 

these pupils are rescreened through progress monitoring at least

 

every 2 to 4 weeks.

 

     (iii) If a pupil receiving additional intervention under

 

subparagraph (ii) is determined by the program screening to still

 

not be meeting applicable basic literacy benchmarks for his or her

 

grade level, shall provide at least 30 more minutes of reading

 

instruction per school day in addition to the instruction required

 

under subparagraph (ii) and the pupil's regular English language

 

arts instruction. This reading instruction shall be of the same

 

type as described in subdivision (c), except that it shall be

 

taught in a combination of small group settings and individual

 

practice.

 

     (3) A district that is subject to this section shall report

 

all of the following to the department on an annual basis by June

 

30 of each year:

 

     (a) The percentage of pupils in each elementary school that

 

receives services from the program under this section who are

 

referred to special education for learning disabilities.

 

     (b) The amount of estimated cost savings, if any, incurred as

 

a result of implementing this intervention program.

 

     (4) A district may contract with an intermediate district to

 

provide the program under this section. If an intermediate district

 

has at least 2 constituent districts that each operate at least 1

 

elementary school that has been determined by the department to be

 

in phase 2 or above of the corrective measures required for schools

 

that are determined to not meet the adequate yearly progress

 

standard in English language arts under the no child left behind


 

act of 2001, Public Law 107-110, the intermediate district shall

 

offer to provide the services required under this section to those

 

constituent districts.

 

     (5) The department shall develop and make available to

 

districts that are subject to this section a model parent

 

notification form that may be used for the purposes of subsection

 

(2).

 

     Enacting section 1. This amendatory act does not take effect

 

unless Senate Bill No. 842 of the 94th Legislature is enacted into

 

law.