EMBEZZLEMENT: VULNERABLE ADULTS S.B. 455 (S-2), 459, & 465 (S-2): FLOOR SUMMARY
[Please see the PDF version of this analysis, if available, to view this image.]






Senate Bill 455 (Substitute S-2 as reported)
Senate Bill 459 (as reported without amendment)
Senate Bill 465 (Substitute S-2 as reported)
Sponsor: Senator Tory Rocca (S.B. 455) Senator Judy K. Emmons (S.B. 459) Senator Dave Hildenbrand (S.B. 465)
Committee: Families, Seniors, and Human Services

CONTENT
Senate Bill 459 would amend the Michigan Penal Code to prescribe enhanced felony penalties for embezzlement of a vulnerable adult if the money or property used or obtained had a value of $50,000 or more. It also would revise a prohibition against fraudulently obtaining a signature, by deleting references to certain financial documents.


The Penal Code prescribes penalties for a person who, through fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or unjust enrichment, obtains or uses or attempts to obtain or use a vulnerable adult's money or property to benefit himself or herself, knowing or having reason to know that the other person is a vulnerable adult. The Code includes a graduated sentencing structure that imposes more serious penalties for greater values of money or property or for repeat convictions, as shown in Table 1. In all cases, the maximum fine is the amount specified or three times the value of the money or property used or obtained, or attempted to be used or obtained, whichever is greater.


Table 1

Value of Money or Property  


Offense		 Maximum Sentence Fine Imprisonment
 
Under $200 		 
Misdemeanor		 $500 93 days
$200 or more but <$1,000; or <$200 + 1 or more priors  
Misdemeanor		 $2,000 1 year
$1,000 or more but <$20,000; or $200 but <$1,000 + 1 or more priors*  
Felony		 $10,000 5 years
$20,000 or more; or $1,000 or more but <$20,000 + 2 or more priors*  
Felony		 $15,000 10 years
* For purposes of this sentence, a prior conviction does not include a conviction for a violation or attempted violation involving money or property valued at less than $200.

Under the bill, the greatest penalty currently available would apply to a violation in which the value of the money or property was $20,000 or more, but less than $50,000 (or the lower amount with prior convictions, as shown in Table 1). Also, the graduated sentencing structure would include two levels of penalties for greater values of money or property, as shown in Table 2.




Table 2

Value of Money or Property  


Offense		 Maximum Sentence Fine Imprisonment
$50,000 or more but <$100,000; or $20,000 or more but <$50,000 + 2 or more priors* Felony $15,000 15 years
$100,000 or more; or $50,000 or more but <$100,000 + 2 or more priors* Felony $50,000 20 years
* For purposes of this sentence, a prior conviction would not include a conviction for a violation involving money or property valued at less than $200.

Under the Code, it is a felony punishable by up to 10 years' imprisonment and/or a maximum fine of $5,000 for a person to obtain the signature of another individual, by representing that he or she is the agent of any person, company, firm, or corporation or by any other means, with the intent to cheat and defraud the individual, to any promissory note, bill of exchange, due bill, order, contract, or any paper writing.


Under the bill, the penalty instead would apply to a person who fraudulently obtained the signature of any individual with the intent to cheat and defraud that person.


Senate Bills 455 (S-2) and 465 (S-2) would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to include the enhanced felony penalties proposed by Senate Bill 459 in the sentencing guidelines.
Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, embezzlement of $20,000 or more (or of $1,000 to $20,000 with prior convictions) by a person in a relationship of trust with a vulnerable adult is a Class D property felony with a statutory maximum sentence of 10 years. Under the bills, that sentencing guidelines designation would apply to embezzlement of $20,000 to $50,000 (or $1,000 to $20,000 with prior convictions).


The bills would add sentencing guidelines designations for the enhanced penalties proposed by Senate Bill 459, as shown in Table 3.


Table 3


Felony		 Class &
Category		 Statutory Max.
Sentence
Embezzlement of $50,000 to $100,000 (or $20,000 to $50,000 with priors) from a vulnerable adult C - Property 15 years
 
Embezzlement of $100,000 or more (or $50,000 to $100,000 with priors) from a vulnerable adult		 B - Property 20 years

In addition, Senate Bill 455 (S-2) would revise the sentencing guidelines description for the felony of fraudulently obtaining a signature. Currently, the description refers to obtaining a signature to a financial document with intent to defraud. Under the bill, the description would refer to obtaining a signature with intent to defraud. (The offense is a Class E property felony, with a statutory maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment.)


Senate Bills 455 (S-2) and 465 (S-2) are tie-barred to Senate Bill 459.


MCL 777.16i & 777.16o (S.B. 455) Legislative Analyst: Patrick Affholter 750.159g et al. (S.B. 459) 777.16i (S.B. 465)


FISCAL IMPACT
The bills would have an indeterminate fiscal impact on State and local government. To the extent that the new felony penalties led to an increase in incarceration, the State and local units of government would incur additional costs. Local governments would incur the costs of incarceration in local facilities, which vary by county. The State would incur the cost of felony probation at an annual average cost of $2,500, as well as the cost of incarceration in a State facility at an average annual cost of $34,000. To the extent that the revised penalties led to an increase in penal fines, the additional revenue would benefit public libraries.


Date Completed: 9-30-11 Fiscal Analyst: Matthew Grabowski

Analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent. sb455,459,465/1112