VEHICULAR ACCESS TO CEMETERY                                                                 H.B. 5404:

                                                                                                      FLOOR SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

House Bill 5404 (as reported without amendment)

Sponsor:  Representative Dale W. Zorn

House Committee:  Local, Intergovernmental, and Regional Affairs

Senate Committee:  Local Government and Elections

 

CONTENT

 

The bill would amend the Land Division Act to require a municipality to reject a proposed division or a plat that did not provide vehicular access to a cemetery by an existing road or street.

 

The Act prescribes criteria that a proposed division must meet in order to be approved by a municipality, and requires a complete application to be approved if the criteria are met.  The criteria include a requirement that each resulting parcel be accessible.  The bill would include among these conditions that the division did not isolate a cemetery so that it did not meet either of the requirements of Section 102(j).

 

Under that section, a parcel is accessible if it meets at least one of the following requirements:

 

 --    Has an area where a driveway provides vehicular access to an existing road or street and meets all applicable location standards of the Michigan Department of Transportation or a county road commission and the city or village, or has an area where a driveway can provide such access and meet all of the standards.

 --    Is served by an existing agreement that provides vehicular access to an existing road or street and that meets all applicable location standards, or can be served by a proposed easement that will provide such access and meet the standards.

 

The Act also contains provisions regarding the approval of a plat, as well as circumstances under which a municipality's governing body must reject a plat.  Under the bill, rejection also would be required if a plat isolated a cemetery so that it did not meet the vehicular access requirements described above.

 

MCL 560.109 & 560.182                                                 Legislative Analyst:  Julie Cassidy

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The bill would have no fiscal impact on State or local government.

 

Date Completed:  12-6-12                                                         Fiscal Analyst:  David Zin

 

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.