No. 41

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOURNAL

OF THE

House of Representatives

97th Legislature

REGULAR SESSION OF 2014

House Chamber, Lansing, Tuesday, May 6, 2014.

1:30 p.m.

The House was called to order by the Speaker.

The roll was called by the Clerk of the House of Representatives, who announced that a quorum was present.

Abed—present Glardon—present LaVoy—present Roberts—present

Banks—present Goike—present Leonard—present Robinson—present

Barnett—present Graves—present Lipton—present Rogers—present

Bolger—present Greimel—present Lori—present Rutledge—present

Brinks—present Haines—present Lund—present Santana—present

Brown—present Haugh—present Lyons—present Schmidt—present

Brunner—present Haveman—present MacGregor—present Schor—present

Bumstead—present Heise—present MacMaster—present Segal—present

Callton—present Hobbs—present McBroom—present Shirkey—present

Cavanagh—present Hooker—present McCann—present Singh—present

Clemente—present Hovey-Wright—present McCready—present Slavens—present

Cochran—present Howrylak—present McMillin—present Smiley—present

Cotter—present Irwin—present Muxlow—present Somerville—present

Crawford—present Jacobsen—present Nathan—present Stallworth—present

Daley—present Jenkins—present Nesbitt—present Stamas—present

Darany—present Johnson—present O’Brien—present Stanley—present

Denby—present Kandrevas—present Oakes—present Switalski—present

Dianda—present Kelly—present Olumba—present Talabi—present

Dillon—present Kesto—present Outman—present Tlaib—present

Driskell—present Kivela—present Pagel—present Townsend—present

Durhal—present Knezek—present Pettalia—present VerHeulen—present

Faris—present Kosowski—present Phelps—present Victory—present

Farrington—present Kowall—present Poleski—present Walsh—present

Forlini—present Kurtz—present Potvin—present Yanez—present

Foster—present LaFontaine—present Price—present Yonker—present

Franz—present Lamonte—present Pscholka—present Zemke—present

Geiss—present Lane—present Rendon—present Zorn—present

Genetski—present Lauwers—present

e/d/s = entered during session

Rep. John Olumba, from the 3rd District, offered the following invocation:

“Heavenly Father, we thank You for being a leader, amongst all leaders. Today, I come to pray for the different leaders that You have put in place. The leader who runs this house and the other leaders in it that all have districts they are responsible for.

Heavenly Father, give them peace, peace of mind, peace of spirit that whatever they do, all of it works toegether for good. We pray that Your will is done and in the end when that happens because You control all things, it is the people who will benefit from the goodness that comes out of this legislature.

So, we pray for peace amongst the leaders and we pray for peace amongst our people of this great state of Michigan and of the United States of America.

Grant us peace heavenly Father, grant us peace. Amen.”

Motions and Resolutions

Reps. Hooker, Zorn, Outman, VerHeulen, Yonker, Callton, Bumstead, Victory, Haines, Franz, Somerville, Kelly, Rendon, MacGregor, Olumba, Heise, Potvin, Graves, Forlini, Jenkins, LaFontaine, O’Brien, Johnson, McMillin, Crawford, Price, Lyons, Kurtz, Goike, Leonard, Rogers, Kowall, Lori, Genetski, Glardon, Shirkey and Brown offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 351.

A resolution to declare this legislative body’s policy to protect life by extending legal protection to as many unborn children with heartbeats as possible under Michigan law.

Whereas, The state of Michigan retains a compelling interest in protecting an unborn child who possesses attributes of life, such as a beating heart and brain waves. Advances in medical knowledge and technology have revealed to medical professionals and laymen alike, the rapid and intricate development of each human being at the earliest stages of life. Pivotal physiological functions, such as a heartbeat within 3 weeks of fertilization and measurable brain waves at approximately 6 weeks of development, are detectable in the earliest stages of development. Common understanding and the law recognize the presence of a heartbeat as an indicator of life and the absence of a heartbeat as an indicator of death; and

Whereas, The state of Michigan has protected unborn children from abortion throughout its history. The legislature acted early in Michigan’s statehood through passage of section 34 of Chapter 153 incorporated in the Revised Statutes of 1846 to penalize willful acts causing miscarriage and has protected pregnant women continuously since then. Further, the people of Michigan voted to maintain a ban on abortion by rejecting Ballot Proposal B of 1972 by a 60 percent to 40 percent margin at a time when other states were voting to legalize abortion; and

Whereas, The Michigan Supreme Court, in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion in all 50 states, stated, “It is the public policy of the state to proscribe abortion,” and acted to preserve the application of Michigan’s abortion ban to the greatest extent possible; and

Whereas, Both the Michigan and U.S. constitutions are established to promote and protect the life and liberty of “ourselves and our posterity,” including unborn children. Abortion is an assault on the life of future generations; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That we declare it is this legislative body’s policy, and within the rights of this state and its people, to protect life by extending legal protection to as many unborn children with heartbeats as possible under Michigan law.

The resolution was referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. LaFontaine, Barnett, Brown, Crawford, Denby, Durhal, Heise, Howrylak, Kowall, LaVoy and Slavens offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 352.

A resolution to declare May 2014 as Lyme Disease Awareness Month in the state of Michigan.

Whereas, As the summer season calls people to Michigan’s outdoors to camp, hike, and otherwise enjoy the beauty of our lush green forests, it is an appropriate time to remind citizens of proper precautions and the safety rules of the woodlands. In recent years, Lyme disease has been a concern among outdoor enthusiasts. We urge Michigan residents to become aware of the signs and symptoms, prevention tactics, and treatment of Lyme disease; and

Whereas, An illness caused by the painless bite of a tiny deer tick, Lyme disease causes serious problems involving the heart, joints, and nervous systems in humans and animals. Prompt medical attention will minimize complications of this illness which initially may cause headaches, stiff muscles and joints, fever, nausea, and fatigue. Usually within a few days of being bitten by an infected tick, a person will develop a circular rash. However, detection of the disease is difficult because early symptoms vary and will disappear only to lead to serious problems later; and

Whereas, First recognized in children in 1975 in Lyme, Connecticut, this disease has been reported with increasing frequency throughout the United States. It is crucial that information relating to Lyme disease be available to the public and that the possible severity of its complications be understood by the citizens of Michigan. We salute the people of the Michigan Lyme Disease Association and the Michigan Department of Community Health for their efforts to expand our awareness and knowledge of the prevention and treatment of Lyme disease; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body declare May 2014 as Lyme Disease Awareness Month in the state of Michigan.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted.

Speaker Bolger offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 353.

A resolution to establish a special committee on Detroit’s recovery and Michigan’s future.

Whereas, The city of Detroit is mired in the largest municipal bankruptcy in the nation; and

Whereas, The House of Representatives will consider the best course of action to resolve Detroit’s bankruptcy, protect pensioners, drive the recovery of Detroit, and establish the best course for the protection of Michigan taxpayers and the future success of the state; and

Whereas, An expedient resolution to Detroit’s bankruptcy and mitigation of impact to Michigan citizens in Detroit, and Michigan taxpayers across the state requires consideration and would require enactment of certain legislation to mitigate risk, ensure success, and resolve disputes; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That there be created a special committee on Detroit’s recovery and Michigan’s future to review and recommend legislation to repair Detroit’s financial health. The special committee on Detroit’s recovery and Michigan’s future shall consist of 5 members appointed in the same manner as standing committees of the House are appointed.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted.

______

The Speaker called Associate Speaker Pro Tempore Cotter to the Chair.

Second Reading of Bills

House Bill No. 4923, entitled

A bill to amend 2001 PA 142, entitled “Michigan memorial highway act,” (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2080) by adding section 1077.

Was read a second time, and the question being on the adoption of the proposed substitute (H-2) previously recommended by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,

The substitute (H-2) was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Nesbitt moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.

The motion prevailed.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be placed on its immediate passage.

The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Third Reading of Bills

House Bill No. 4923, entitled

A bill to amend 2001 PA 142, entitled “Michigan memorial highway act,” (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2080) by adding section 1077.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 195 Yeas—110

Abed Glardon LaVoy Roberts

Banks Goike Leonard Robinson

Barnett Graves Lipton Rogers

Bolger Greimel Lori Rutledge

Brinks Haines Lund Santana

Brown Haugh Lyons Schmidt

Brunner Haveman MacGregor Schor

Bumstead Heise MacMaster Segal

Callton Hobbs McBroom Shirkey

Cavanagh Hooker McCann Singh

Clemente Hovey-Wright McCready Slavens

Cochran Howrylak McMillin Smiley

Cotter Irwin Muxlow Somerville

Crawford Jacobsen Nathan Stallworth

Daley Jenkins Nesbitt Stamas

Darany Johnson O’Brien Stanley

Denby Kandrevas Oakes Switalski

Dianda Kelly Olumba Talabi

Dillon Kesto Outman Tlaib

Driskell Kivela Pagel Townsend

Durhal Knezek Pettalia VerHeulen

Faris Kosowski Phelps Victory

Farrington Kowall Poleski Walsh

Forlini Kurtz Potvin Yanez

Foster LaFontaine Price Yonker

Franz Lamonte Pscholka Zemke

Geiss Lane Rendon Zorn

Genetski Lauwers

Nays—0

In The Chair: Cotter

The question being on agreeing to the title of the bill,

Rep. Stamas moved to amend the title to read as follows:

A bill to amend 2001 PA 142, entitled “Michigan memorial highway act,” (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2080) by adding section 1062.

The motion prevailed.

The House agreed to the title as amended.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Reps. Banks, Barnett, Brinks, Brown, Brunner, Bumstead, Cavanagh, Clemente, Cochran, Cotter, Crawford, Daley, Darany, Denby, Dianda, Dillon, Driskell, Durhal, Faris, Forlini, Franz, Geiss, Genetski, Glardon, Graves, Greimel, Haines, Haugh, Heise, Howrylak, Irwin, Jenkins, Kelly, Kivela, Knezek, Kosowski, Kowall, Lamonte, Lane, LaVoy, Leonard, Lori, Lund, Lyons, MacMaster, McCann, Muxlow, O’Brien, Oakes, Olumba, Outman, Pagel, Phelps, Poleski, Potvin, Price, Pscholka, Rendon, Roberts, Robinson, Rogers, Rutledge, Santana, Schor, Segal, Singh, Slavens, Smiley, Somerville, Stamas, Stanley, Switalski, Talabi, Tlaib, VerHeulen, Victory, Walsh, Zemke and Zorn were named co‑sponsors of the bill.

Second Reading of Bills

House Bill No. 5447, entitled

A bill to amend 2001 PA 142, entitled “Michigan memorial highway act,” (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2080) by adding section 81.

The bill was read a second time.

Rep. Kivela moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.

The motion prevailed.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be placed on its immediate passage.

The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Third Reading of Bills

House Bill No. 5447, entitled

A bill to amend 2001 PA 142, entitled “Michigan memorial highway act,” (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2080) by adding section 81.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 196 Yeas—110

Abed Glardon LaVoy Roberts

Banks Goike Leonard Robinson

Barnett Graves Lipton Rogers

Bolger Greimel Lori Rutledge

Brinks Haines Lund Santana

Brown Haugh Lyons Schmidt

Brunner Haveman MacGregor Schor

Bumstead Heise MacMaster Segal

Callton Hobbs McBroom Shirkey

Cavanagh Hooker McCann Singh

Clemente Hovey-Wright McCready Slavens

Cochran Howrylak McMillin Smiley

Cotter Irwin Muxlow Somerville

Crawford Jacobsen Nathan Stallworth

Daley Jenkins Nesbitt Stamas

Darany Johnson O’Brien Stanley

Denby Kandrevas Oakes Switalski

Dianda Kelly Olumba Talabi

Dillon Kesto Outman Tlaib

Driskell Kivela Pagel Townsend

Durhal Knezek Pettalia VerHeulen

Faris Kosowski Phelps Victory

Farrington Kowall Poleski Walsh

Forlini Kurtz Potvin Yanez

Foster LaFontaine Price Yonker

Franz Lamonte Pscholka Zemke

Geiss Lane Rendon Zorn

Genetski Lauwers

Nays—0

In The Chair: Cotter

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Reports of Standing Committees

The Speaker laid before the House

House Resolution No. 319.

A resolution to memorialize the Congress of the United States to oppose the U.S. Department of Defense’s budget proposal that would potentially close commissaries at U.S. military bases and to ensure that replacement aircraft are assigned to Selfridge Air National Guard Base to compensate for the proposed elimination of the A-10 fleet.

(For text of resolution, see House Journal No. 30, p. 414.)

(The resolution was reported by the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs on April 30.)

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted.

Messages from the Senate

The Speaker laid before the House

House Bill No. 5277, entitled

A bill to amend 1961 PA 236, entitled “Revised judicature act of 1961,” by amending sections 3204, 3240, and 3278 (MCL 600.3204, 600.3240, and 600.3278), section 3204 as amended by 2013 PA 103, section 3240 as amended by 2013 PA 104, and section 3278 as added by 2011 PA 301, and by adding sections 3237 and 3238; and to repeal acts and parts of acts.

(The bill was received from the Senate on April 29, with substitute (S-1), full title inserted and immediate effect given by the Senate, consideration of which, under the rules, was postponed until April 30, see House Journal No. 38, p. 631.)

The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate,

The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 197 Yeas—110

Abed Glardon LaVoy Roberts

Banks Goike Leonard Robinson

Barnett Graves Lipton Rogers

Bolger Greimel Lori Rutledge

Brinks Haines Lund Santana

Brown Haugh Lyons Schmidt

Brunner Haveman MacGregor Schor

Bumstead Heise MacMaster Segal

Callton Hobbs McBroom Shirkey

Cavanagh Hooker McCann Singh

Clemente Hovey-Wright McCready Slavens

Cochran Howrylak McMillin Smiley

Cotter Irwin Muxlow Somerville

Crawford Jacobsen Nathan Stallworth

Daley Jenkins Nesbitt Stamas

Darany Johnson O’Brien Stanley

Denby Kandrevas Oakes Switalski

Dianda Kelly Olumba Talabi

Dillon Kesto Outman Tlaib

Driskell Kivela Pagel Townsend

Durhal Knezek Pettalia VerHeulen

Faris Kosowski Phelps Victory

Farrington Kowall Poleski Walsh

Forlini Kurtz Potvin Yanez

Foster LaFontaine Price Yonker

Franz Lamonte Pscholka Zemke

Geiss Lane Rendon Zorn

Genetski Lauwers

Nays—0

In The Chair: Cotter

The House agreed to the full title.

The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.

Third Reading of Bills

Senate Bill No. 671, entitled

A bill to amend 1979 PA 152, entitled “State license fee act,” (MCL 338.2201 to 338.2277) by adding section 4.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 198 Yeas—110

Abed Glardon LaVoy Roberts

Banks Goike Leonard Robinson

Barnett Graves Lipton Rogers

Bolger Greimel Lori Rutledge

Brinks Haines Lund Santana

Brown Haugh Lyons Schmidt

Brunner Haveman MacGregor Schor

Bumstead Heise MacMaster Segal

Callton Hobbs McBroom Shirkey

Cavanagh Hooker McCann Singh

Clemente Hovey-Wright McCready Slavens

Cochran Howrylak McMillin Smiley

Cotter Irwin Muxlow Somerville

Crawford Jacobsen Nathan Stallworth

Daley Jenkins Nesbitt Stamas

Darany Johnson O’Brien Stanley

Denby Kandrevas Oakes Switalski

Dianda Kelly Olumba Talabi

Dillon Kesto Outman Tlaib

Driskell Kivela Pagel Townsend

Durhal Knezek Pettalia VerHeulen

Faris Kosowski Phelps Victory

Farrington Kowall Poleski Walsh

Forlini Kurtz Potvin Yanez

Foster LaFontaine Price Yonker

Franz Lamonte Pscholka Zemke

Geiss Lane Rendon Zorn

Genetski Lauwers

Nays—0

In The Chair: Cotter

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

“An act to provide for the establishment and collection of fees for the investigation, regulation, and enforcement of certain occupations and professions, and for certain agencies and businesses; to create certain funds for certain purposes; and to prescribe certain powers and duties of certain state agencies and departments,”

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 672, entitled

A bill to amend 1968 PA 330, entitled “Private security business and security alarm act,” by amending sections 6 and 9 (MCL 338.1056 and 338.1059), section 6 as amended by 2012 PA 419 and section 9 as amended by 2010 PA 68.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 199 Yeas—110

Abed Glardon LaVoy Roberts

Banks Goike Leonard Robinson

Barnett Graves Lipton Rogers

Bolger Greimel Lori Rutledge

Brinks Haines Lund Santana

Brown Haugh Lyons Schmidt

Brunner Haveman MacGregor Schor

Bumstead Heise MacMaster Segal

Callton Hobbs McBroom Shirkey

Cavanagh Hooker McCann Singh

Clemente Hovey-Wright McCready Slavens

Cochran Howrylak McMillin Smiley

Cotter Irwin Muxlow Somerville

Crawford Jacobsen Nathan Stallworth

Daley Jenkins Nesbitt Stamas

Darany Johnson O’Brien Stanley

Denby Kandrevas Oakes Switalski

Dianda Kelly Olumba Talabi

Dillon Kesto Outman Tlaib

Driskell Kivela Pagel Townsend

Durhal Knezek Pettalia VerHeulen

Faris Kosowski Phelps Victory

Farrington Kowall Poleski Walsh

Forlini Kurtz Potvin Yanez

Foster LaFontaine Price Yonker

Franz Lamonte Pscholka Zemke

Geiss Lane Rendon Zorn

Genetski Lauwers

Nays—0

In The Chair: Cotter

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

“An act to license and regulate private security guards, private security police, private security guard agencies, private college security forces, and security alarm systems servicing, installing, operating, and monitoring; to provide penalties for violations; to protect the general public against unauthorized, unlicensed and unethical operations by individuals engaged in private security activity or security alarm systems sales, installations, service, maintenance, and operations; to establish minimum qualifications for individuals as well as private agencies engaged in the security business and security alarm systems and operations; to impose certain fees; to create certain funds; and to prescribe certain powers and duties of certain private colleges and certain state departments, agencies, and officers,”

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 562, entitled

A bill to amend 1893 PA 206, entitled “The general property tax act,” by amending section 87b (MCL 211.87b), as amended by 2002 PA 198.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 200 Yeas—110

Abed Glardon LaVoy Roberts

Banks Goike Leonard Robinson

Barnett Graves Lipton Rogers

Bolger Greimel Lori Rutledge

Brinks Haines Lund Santana

Brown Haugh Lyons Schmidt

Brunner Haveman MacGregor Schor

Bumstead Heise MacMaster Segal

Callton Hobbs McBroom Shirkey

Cavanagh Hooker McCann Singh

Clemente Hovey-Wright McCready Slavens

Cochran Howrylak McMillin Smiley

Cotter Irwin Muxlow Somerville

Crawford Jacobsen Nathan Stallworth

Daley Jenkins Nesbitt Stamas

Darany Johnson O’Brien Stanley

Denby Kandrevas Oakes Switalski

Dianda Kelly Olumba Talabi

Dillon Kesto Outman Tlaib

Driskell Kivela Pagel Townsend

Durhal Knezek Pettalia VerHeulen

Faris Kosowski Phelps Victory

Farrington Kowall Poleski Walsh

Forlini Kurtz Potvin Yanez

Foster LaFontaine Price Yonker

Franz Lamonte Pscholka Zemke

Geiss Lane Rendon Zorn

Genetski Lauwers

Nays—0

In The Chair: Cotter

The question being on agreeing to the title of the bill,

Rep. Stamas moved to amend the title to read as follows:

A bill to amend 1893 PA 206, entitled “An act to provide for the assessment of rights and interests, including leasehold interests, in property and the levy and collection of taxes on property, and for the collection of taxes levied; making those taxes a lien on the property taxed, establishing and continuing the lien, providing for the sale or forfeiture and conveyance of property delinquent for taxes, and for the inspection and disposition of lands bid off to the state and not redeemed or purchased; to provide for the establishment of a delinquent tax revolving fund and the borrowing of money by counties and the issuance of notes; to define and limit the jurisdiction of the courts in proceedings in connection with property delinquent for taxes; to limit the time within which actions may be brought; to prescribe certain limitations with respect to rates of taxation; to prescribe certain powers and duties of certain officers, departments, agencies, and political subdivisions of this state; to provide for certain reimbursements of certain expenses incurred by units of local government; to provide penalties for the violation of this act; and to repeal acts and parts of acts,” by amending section 87b (MCL 211.87b), as amended by 2014 PA 33.

The motion prevailed.

The House agreed to the title as amended.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

House Bill No. 5400, entitled

A bill to amend 1994 PA 451, entitled “Natural resources and environmental protection act,” by amending sections 8504, 8505, 11502, 11503, 11504, 11505, 11506, 11542, 20101, 20114e, and 20115 (MCL 324.8504, 324.8505, 324.11502, 324.11503, 324.11504, 324.11505, 324.11506, 324.11542, 324.20101, 324.20114e, and 324.20115), sections 8504 and 11542 as amended by 2004 PA 325, section 8505 as amended by 2006 PA 503, sections 11502, 11503, and 11505 as amended by 2007 PA 212, section 11504 as amended by 2013 PA 250, sections 11506 and 20114e as amended by 2012 PA 446, section 20101 as amended by 2013 PA 141, and section 20115 as amended by 1995 PA 117, and by adding sections 3112e, 11551, 11551a, 11552, 11553, and 11554.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 201 Yeas—68

Bolger Goike Lane Pagel

Brunner Graves Lauwers Pettalia

Bumstead Haines LaVoy Poleski

Callton Haugh Leonard Potvin

Cavanagh Haveman Lori Price

Clemente Heise Lund Pscholka

Cotter Hooker Lyons Rendon

Crawford Howrylak MacGregor Rogers

Daley Jacobsen MacMaster Schmidt

Denby Jenkins McBroom Shirkey

Dianda Johnson McCready Somerville

Farrington Kelly McMillin Stamas

Forlini Kesto Muxlow VerHeulen

Foster Kivela Nesbitt Victory

Franz Kowall O’Brien Walsh

Genetski Kurtz Olumba Yonker

Glardon LaFontaine Outman Zorn

Nays—42

Abed Geiss Nathan Slavens

Banks Greimel Oakes Smiley

Barnett Hobbs Phelps Stallworth

Brinks Hovey-Wright Roberts Stanley

Brown Irwin Robinson Switalski

Cochran Kandrevas Rutledge Talabi

Darany Knezek Santana Tlaib

Dillon Kosowski Schor Townsend

Driskell Lamonte Segal Yanez

Durhal Lipton Singh Zemke

Faris McCann

In The Chair: Cotter

The question being on agreeing to the title of the bill,

Rep. Stamas moved to amend the title to read as follows:

A bill to amend 1994 PA 451, entitled “Natural resources and environmental protection act,” by amending sections 8504, 8505, 8513, 11502, 11503, 11504, 11505, 11506, 11542, 20101, 20114e, and 20115 (MCL 324.8504, 324.8505, 324.8513, 324.11502, 324.11503, 324.11504, 324.11505, 324.11506, 324.11542, 324.20101, 324.20114e, and 324.20115), sections 8504 and 11542 as amended by 2004 PA 325, section 8505 as amended by 2006 PA 503, section 8513 as added by 1995 PA 60, section 11502 as amended by 2007 PA 212, sections 11503, 11505, and 11506 as amended by 2014 PA 24, section 11504 as amended by 2013 PA 250, section 20101 as amended by 2013 PA 141, section 20114e as amended by 2012 PA 446, and section 20115 as amended by 1995 PA 117, and by adding sections 3112e, 11551, 11551a, 11552, 11553, and 11554.

The motion prevailed.

The House agreed to the title as amended.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

House Bill No. 5401, entitled

A bill to amend 1994 PA 451, entitled “Natural resources and environmental protection act,” by amending section 20126 (MCL 324.20126), as amended by 2012 PA 446.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 202 Yeas—66

Bolger Graves Lauwers Pettalia

Bumstead Haines LaVoy Poleski

Callton Haugh Leonard Potvin

Cavanagh Haveman Lori Price

Clemente Heise Lund Pscholka

Cotter Hooker Lyons Rendon

Crawford Howrylak MacGregor Rogers

Daley Jacobsen MacMaster Schmidt

Denby Jenkins McBroom Shirkey

Dianda Johnson McCready Somerville

Farrington Kelly McMillin Stamas

Forlini Kesto Muxlow VerHeulen

Foster Kivela Nesbitt Victory

Franz Kowall O’Brien Walsh

Genetski Kurtz Outman Yonker

Glardon LaFontaine Pagel Zorn

Goike Lane

Nays—44

Abed Faris McCann Singh

Banks Geiss Nathan Slavens

Barnett Greimel Oakes Smiley

Brinks Hobbs Olumba Stallworth

Brown Hovey-Wright Phelps Stanley

Brunner Irwin Roberts Switalski

Cochran Kandrevas Robinson Talabi

Darany Knezek Rutledge Tlaib

Dillon Kosowski Santana Townsend

Driskell Lamonte Schor Yanez

Durhal Lipton Segal Zemke

In The Chair: Cotter

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Shirkey moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

House Bill No. 5402, entitled

A bill to amend 1955 PA 162, entitled “An act to provide for the licensing and inspection of agricultural liming material and to regulate the sale thereof; and to prescribe penalties for the violations of the provisions of this act,” by amending section 2 (MCL 290.532).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 203 Yeas—66

Bolger Graves Lauwers Pettalia

Brunner Haines LaVoy Poleski

Bumstead Haugh Leonard Potvin

Callton Haveman Lori Price

Clemente Heise Lund Pscholka

Cotter Hooker Lyons Rendon

Crawford Howrylak MacGregor Rogers

Daley Jacobsen MacMaster Schmidt

Denby Jenkins McBroom Shirkey

Dianda Johnson McCready Somerville

Farrington Kelly McMillin Stamas

Forlini Kesto Muxlow VerHeulen

Foster Kivela Nesbitt Victory

Franz Kowall O’Brien Walsh

Genetski Kurtz Outman Yonker

Glardon LaFontaine Pagel Zorn

Goike Lane

Nays—44

Abed Faris McCann Singh

Banks Geiss Nathan Slavens

Barnett Greimel Oakes Smiley

Brinks Hobbs Olumba Stallworth

Brown Hovey-Wright Phelps Stanley

Cavanagh Irwin Roberts Switalski

Cochran Kandrevas Robinson Talabi

Darany Knezek Rutledge Tlaib

Dillon Kosowski Santana Townsend

Driskell Lamonte Schor Yanez

Durhal Lipton Segal Zemke

In The Chair: Cotter

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 628, entitled

A bill to amend 1985 PA 87, entitled “William Van Regenmorter crime victim’s rights act,” by amending section 2 (MCL 780.752), as amended by 2009 PA 28.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 204 Yeas—110

Abed Glardon LaVoy Roberts

Banks Goike Leonard Robinson

Barnett Graves Lipton Rogers

Bolger Greimel Lori Rutledge

Brinks Haines Lund Santana

Brown Haugh Lyons Schmidt

Brunner Haveman MacGregor Schor

Bumstead Heise MacMaster Segal

Callton Hobbs McBroom Shirkey

Cavanagh Hooker McCann Singh

Clemente Hovey-Wright McCready Slavens

Cochran Howrylak McMillin Smiley

Cotter Irwin Muxlow Somerville

Crawford Jacobsen Nathan Stallworth

Daley Jenkins Nesbitt Stamas

Darany Johnson O’Brien Stanley

Denby Kandrevas Oakes Switalski

Dianda Kelly Olumba Talabi

Dillon Kesto Outman Tlaib

Driskell Kivela Pagel Townsend

Durhal Knezek Pettalia VerHeulen

Faris Kosowski Phelps Victory

Farrington Kowall Poleski Walsh

Forlini Kurtz Potvin Yanez

Foster LaFontaine Price Yonker

Franz Lamonte Pscholka Zemke

Geiss Lane Rendon Zorn

Genetski Lauwers

Nays—0

In The Chair: Cotter

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

“An act to establish the rights of victims of crime and juvenile offenses; to provide for certain procedures; to establish certain immunities and duties; to limit convicted criminals from deriving profit under certain circumstances; to prohibit certain conduct of employers or employers’ agents toward victims; and to provide for penalties and remedies,”

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Second Reading of Bills

House Bill No. 5313, entitled

A bill to make, supplement, adjust, and consolidate appropriations for various state departments and agencies, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015 and other fiscal years; to provide for certain conditions on appropriations; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.

Was read a second time, and the question being on the adoption of the proposed substitute (H-1) previously recommended by the Committee on Appropriations,

The substitute (H-1) was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Shirkey moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 10, following line 13, by inserting:

“Sec. 205. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

2. Amend page 46, following line 20, by inserting:

“Sec. 204. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

3. Amend page 121, following line 1, by inserting:

“Sec. 247. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, the legislative corrections ombudsman, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

4. Amend page 171, following line 8, by inserting:

“Sec. 234. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

5. Amend page 195, following line 7, by inserting:

“Sec. 204. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

6. Amend page 253, following line 16, by inserting:

“Sec. 207. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department or agency shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

7. Amend page 394, following line 19, by inserting:

“Sec. 206. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

8. Amend page 450, following line 11, by inserting:

“Sec. 205. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

9. Amend page 469, following line 9, by inserting:

“Sec. 225. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the judiciary shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

10. Amend page 488, following line 2, by inserting:

“Sec. 205. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

11. Amend page 525, following line 2, by inserting:

“Sec. 219a. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

12. Amend page 563, following line 19, by inserting:

“Sec. 204. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

13. Amend page 594, following line 1, by inserting:

“Sec. 219a. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

14. Amend page 637, following line 22, by inserting:

“Sec. 204. (1) For each new program or program increase for which funds are appropriated in part 1, the department shall report the following to the house and senate appropriations committees, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director:

(a) By November 1, 2014, a list of specific benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program and its associated expenditures.

(b) By March 1, 2015, an update on the progress of the program and the status of expenditures for the program as measured by those benchmarks.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that, beginning with the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, any proposal for a new program or spending increase on existing programs initiated by the executive branch or the legislature shall include, as part of the original proposal or budget request, a specific list of benchmarks intended to measure the performance or return on taxpayer investment of the program or spending increase.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Potvin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 19, line 26, after “appropriation,” by striking out “each local conservation district” and inserting “local conservation districts”.

2. Amend page 20, line 5, after “sources” by striking out “or be used for basic operations”.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Shirkey moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 54, line 17, by striking out all of section 282 and inserting:

“Sec. 282. (1) The department and the department of technology, management, and budget shall establish an automated annual metric collection, validation, and reporting process for contracts via the state’s e-procurement system. The department shall report the status of this work and a project plan to the house and senate appropriations subcommittees on community health and the house and senate fiscal agencies by October 1 of the current fiscal year.

(2) By June 30 of the current fiscal year, the department shall provide a report to the house and senate appropriations subcommittees on community health and the house and senate fiscal agencies that presents performance metrics on all new or existing contracts at renewal of $1,000,000.00 or more funded with state general fund/general purpose or state restricted resources. The performance metrics shall include, at a minimum, service delivery volumes and provider or beneficiary outcomes.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Kowall moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 185, by striking out all of line 26 and inserting:

“Water quality and use initiative/general—5.0 FTE positions................................................ 2,477,200

Real-time beach monitoring program........................................................................................... 500,000

Wetlands program......................................................................................................................... 1,000,000”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 210, by striking out all of lines 6 through 9 and inserting “quality and use initiative/general line item, funding shall also be”.

3. Amend page 210, line 14, after “the” by striking out “funding” and inserting “water quality and use initiative/general line item, the real-time beach monitoring program line item, and the wetlands program line item”.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Stamas moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 211, line 2, by striking out all of section 601.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Bumstead moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 210, following line 26, by inserting:

AIR QUALITY DIVISION

Sec. 501. (1) Of the funds appropriated in part 1 for the air quality program, $1,000,000.00 shall be used by the department to distribute as grants to businesses in Michigan that have been financially harmed by the application of the United States environmental protection agency 1995 temporary policy position commonly known as “once in, always in.” The department shall give preference to businesses located in Oceana County.

(2) Any amount of the grant funding referenced in subsection (1) that is not expended by September 30, 2015 shall lapse to the state general fund/general purpose account.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Bumstead moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 210, following line 26, by inserting:

AIR QUALITY DIVISION

Sec. 502. The department shall not assess additional penalties under part 55 of the natural resources and environmental protection act, 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.5501 to 324.5542, for violations that occurred under a previous owner unless compelled by a consent order or judgment, or other legal requirement.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Haveman moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 259, following line 20, by inserting:

“Sec. 239. The department of technology, management, and budget, with the assistance of the Michigan energy office as necessary, shall assess the energy performance of state-owned buildings so that state departments, agencies, and authorities are better able to identify priority projects for energy improvements that can be achieved with internal resources and energy savings performance contracts under the cost-effective governmental energy use act, 2012 PA 625, MCL 18.1711 to 18.1725.”.

2. Amend page 290, following line 4, by inserting:

“Sec. 815. (1) The department of technology, management, and budget shall review all existing and proposed capital improvement projects over $500,000.00 for inclusion in an energy savings performance contract under the cost-effective governmental energy use act, 2012 PA 625, MCL 18.1711 to 18.1725.

(2) By February 15, 2015, the department of technology, management, and budget shall report to the senate and house appropriations subcommittees on general government and the senate and house fiscal agencies on the use of energy savings performance contracts. At a minimum, the report shall identify each capital improvement project over $500,000.00 and for each project listed, include the following information:

(a) A brief project description.

(b) Whether the project was included in an energy savings performance contract, and if not, a brief explanation of why the project was not included in an energy savings performance contract.

(c) If applicable, identification of the energy savings performance contract and the qualified energy service provider under the contract.

(d) If included in an energy savings performance contract, an estimate of the energy savings to be achieved.

(e) If included in an energy savings performance contract, the cost of inclusion in the contract.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Shirkey moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 356, following line 19, by inserting:

“Sec. 1016. The MEDC, in cooperation with Travel Michigan, shall propose to the senate and house of representatives no later than February 1, 2015 a plan for how Pure Michigan will be funded with incrementally increasing private source matching funds when general fund spending is proposed in a budget. The first increment shall be 50.0% nonrestricted and 50.0% private. The private sector match shall increase 5.0% per year thereafter until private funding sources represent 75.0% of nonrestricted funding.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. McCready moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 294, following line 24, by inserting:

“Sec. 822h. The department of technology, management, and budget, working jointly with the department of state police, shall review and evaluate the feasibility of repurposing the one division building in Grand Rapids for a new state police crime laboratory. By January 1, 2015, the department of technology, management, and budget shall report to the senate and house appropriations subcommittees on general government and the senate and house fiscal agencies on the results of that review, including matters considered, any recommendations, and the reasons for those recommendations.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Haveman moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 407, following line 10, by inserting:

“Sec. 310. It is the intent of the legislature that the department shall work with youth-oriented nonprofit organizations to provide mentoring programming for children of incarcerated parents and other at-risk children.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. McBroom moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 550, line 14, after “control” by striking out “16.0” and inserting “4.0” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 562, line 6, after “control” by striking out “-one-time”.

3. Amend page 568, following line 26, by inserting:

DEPARTMENT INITIATIVES

Sec. 251. From the amounts appropriated in part 1 for invasive species prevention and control, the department shall allocate not less than $4,400,000.00 for grants for the prevention, detection, eradication, and control of invasive species.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. McCready moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 623, line 16, after “safety” by inserting “without bias toward public or private educational institutions”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Shirkey moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 369, line 23, after “located.” by inserting “A plan that demonstrates collaboration between postsecondary and school districts or intermediate school districts in the prosperity region in meeting demonstrated employer demand shall receive extra consideration in the competitive process.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Tlaib moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 40, line 10, by striking out “198,120,700” and inserting “243,846,900”.

2. Amend page 41, line 4, by striking out “9,214,801,700” and inserting “9,245,227,900”.

3. Amend page 41, line 10, by striking out “1,640,232,400” and inserting “1,655,532,400” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Dillon moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 40, line 10, by striking out “198,120,700” and inserting “210,075,300”.

2. Amend page 41, line 4, by striking out “9,214,801,700” and inserting “9,222,756,300”.

3. Amend page 41, line 10, by striking out “1,640,232,400” and inserting “1,644,232,400” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Tlaib moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 41, line 24, by striking out “2,901,900” and inserting “4,314,200”.

2. Amend page 42, line 5, by striking out “5,864,400” and inserting “6,790,000”.

3. Amend page 42, line 8, by striking out “11,592,300” and inserting “12,079,000” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Roberts moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 32, line 3, by striking out “8,450,000” and inserting “10,450,000”.

2. Amend page 32, line 15, by striking out “4,588,400” and inserting “6,588,400” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Kandrevas moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 104, line 4, by striking out “144,315,800” and inserting “149,215,800” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Durhal moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 108, following line 5, by inserting:

“Exterior security enhancements—136.5 FTE positions......................................................... 23,400,000”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 153, following line 26, by inserting:

“Sec. 945. From the funds appropriated in part 1 for exterior security enhancements, $13,200,000.00 shall be used for patrolling the perimeter of correctional facilities using alert response vehicles, and $10,200,000.00 shall be used to staff guard towers at correctional facilities.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Durhal moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 132, line 25, after “County” by striking out “and” and inserting a comma.

2. Amend page 132, line 26, after “County” by inserting a comma and “and the legal aid and defender office in Wayne County”.

3. Amend page 132, line 26, after “establish” by striking out “2” and inserting “3”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Durhal moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 133, following line 3, by inserting:

“(2) The legal aid and defender office in Oakland County shall provide prisoner re-entry legal services to former offenders in Wayne County.” and renumbering the remaining subsections.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Durhal moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 153, following line 26, by inserting:

“Sec. 945. Funds appropriated in part 1 shall not be used by the department to contract for the provision of prison food service.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Kandrevas moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 153, following line 26, by inserting:

“Sec. 945. Funds appropriated in part 1 shall not be used by the department to contract with a company that has a history of violating the terms of a contract related to the provision of prison food service.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Roberts moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 189, line 17, by striking out “1,000,000” and inserting “5,000,000” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Roberts moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 212, following line 7, by inserting:

“Sec. 605. (1) With the money appropriated in part 1, prior to issuing a permit or authorizing the use of an oil or gas well for hydraulic fracturing, if the department receives a request from the city, village, or township in which the oil or gas well is located or from any person who is or may be adversely impacted by the hydraulic fracturing operation, including any person whose water supply may be adversely impacted by the hydraulic fracturing operation, the department shall hold a public hearing in the city, village, or township or the county in which the oil or gas well is located prior to making a decision on the application. At the public hearing, the department shall allow interested parties to provide written comments and recommendations to the supervisor pertaining to the application. The supervisor shall consider all such comments and recommendations in reviewing the application.

(2) As used in this section, “hydraulic fracturing” means injecting foam or fluid in a well under pressure to create fractures in a formation and thereby enhance production of hydrocarbons.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Roberts moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 186, following line 3, by inserting:

“Green infrastructure grants to control stormwater runoff...................................................... $ 1,000,000”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 210, following line 26, by inserting:

“Sec. 406. From the funds appropriated in part for the green infrastructure grants to control stormwater runoff program, the department shall create a competitive grant program and award grants to local units of government for green infrastructure projects that help control stormwater runoff and reduce pollution impacts to waterways.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Tlaib moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 212, following line 7, by inserting:

“Sec. 606. From the funds appropriated in part 1, the department shall establish a permitting program to require a permit for the storage of petroleum coke and its byproducts.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Tlaib moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 212, following line 7, by inserting:

“Sec. 607. Funds appropriated in part 1 shall be used by the department to promulgate a rule pursuant to the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, to require that storage piles of petroleum coke and its byproducts must be covered at all times.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Durhal moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 218, line 16, after “operations” by striking out “119.0” and inserting “124.0”.

2. Amend page 218, line 16, after “positions” by striking out “13,629,300” and inserting “14,216,800” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Singh moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 244, following line 5, by inserting:

“Engineering talent investment program debt service............................................................. 7,900,000”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 369, following line 3, by inserting:

“Sec. 1051. (1) No long-term indebtedness shall be issued by the Michigan strategic fund or funds expended from the appropriations for the annual debt service in part 1 until the Michigan strategic fund board approves the request for proposals and guidelines for the engineering talent investment program.

(2) Up to $100,000,000.00 for the engineering talent investment program shall be made available for capital improvements at Michigan public institutions of higher education that are necessary to enhance talent critical to Michigan’s economic growth. Awards shall be made through a competitive process that develops talent that directly addresses Michigan’s engineering talent needs. Program awards shall be made by the Michigan strategic fund board no later than April 1, 2015. Proposal requirements shall include at least the following:

(a) A description of the capital project and presentation of a professional cost estimate.

(b) A plan that includes at minimum one Michigan employer with a tangible commitment to hire engineering graduates from the engineering program. Internships with the employer may be part of the tangible commitment plan and are encouraged to commence immediately and be part of the on-going commitment.

(c) Demonstrate that funded improvements will increase the number of Michigan engineering graduates to address the identified talent needs.

(d) A strategic plan from the public higher education institution addressing placement of engineering graduates in Michigan companies from the identified engineering programs with annual engagement and employment retention goals. This plan shall include partnerships with Michigan businesses that require engineering talent.

(e) The engineering programs supported through this initiative shall be accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., a national accrediting organization for engineering and technology programs.

(f) Source of cash and other cost share that will be provided as match for the award. The public higher education institution shall provide, at minimum, 25 percent of the total project cost. Additional cash match may also be provided from Michigan businesses on behalf of the institution but shall not be the amount paid to students for internships or employment of graduates from the programs.

(3) Bond proceeds may only be spent to reimburse eligible costs incurred by Michigan public institutions of higher education for capital costs related to the construction, expansion, renovation, re-purposing and equipping of facilities that provide primary instructional, laboratory or research support to accredited engineering programs. The Michigan strategic fund and the higher education institutions shall enter into an agreement providing for the terms of reimbursement, the total project budget, amount of the cash match provided by the institution, allowable costs, financial reporting, reporting requirements of annual progress to strategic plan goals that are due by October 15 each year, and any other requirements necessary to complete the transaction. Approved award activity shall commence by April 1, 2016. The award may be terminated by the Michigan strategic fund board for non-compliance with the award agreement.

(4) All awards shall contain a provision that the Michigan strategic fund and the office of the auditor general have access to the books and records, including financial records and all other information and data relevant to the terms of the award, related to the use of the grant funds and goals included in the award document.

(5) The Michigan strategic fund may receive and expend bond proceeds and other revenues relating to these programs including administrative expenses that shall not exceed one percent. The Michigan economic development corporation may provide administration for these programs.

(6) The state budget director retains the authority and fiduciary responsibility normally associated with the maintenance of the public’s financial and policy interests relative to state-financed construction projects. The state budget director may take appropriate action to protect the public’s financial and policy interests, including, but not limited to, rescinding subsection (2) reimbursement payments for any award involving construction of a facility. The state budget director shall provide notification to the senate and house appropriations committees, senate fiscal agency, house fiscal agency, and the Michigan strategic fund within 10 days of exercising the authority under this subsection.

(7) The department of technology, management and budget may assist the Michigan strategic fund and the Michigan economic development corporation with implementation of this program for purposes of administrative efficiency.

(8) The Michigan strategic fund shall provide a report to the senate and house appropriations general government subcommittees, senate and house fiscal agencies and the state budget director program no later than April 15, 2015 that includes a brief description of each of the fund award, the evaluation criteria used to award funding, and the amount of funding awarded to each recipient. Annual status reports from the Michigan strategic fund and award recipients will be included in the Michigan strategic fund annual report to the legislature as required in Public Act 270 of 1984, as amended, through substantial completion of the awarded projects.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Singh moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 259, following line 20, by inserting:

“Sec. 236. For departments and agencies receiving appropriations in part 1, the compensation and benefits for all state department and state agency directors, appointees, and the appointees of the department of treasury shall be no higher than the compensation and benefits received by the governor.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Singh moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 259, following line 20, by inserting:

“Sec. 237. (1) Funds appropriated under this act shall not be used to appeal or pursue continued litigation in the case of April Deboer, et al v Richard Snyder, et al, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Docket No. 12-CV-10285), United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Case No. 14-1341). This prohibition includes but is not limited to the use of state resources to appeal or otherwise contest the March 21, 2014 ruling of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, or any other ruling against the State, in Deboer v Snyder.

(2) A state department or agency receiving funds under this act, including but not limited to the attorney general, the executive office, the department of technology, management, and budget, and the civil service commission, shall not accept or utilize any grants, gifts, or bequests or any pro bono legal services or other in-kind services to appeal or pursue continued litigation in the case of April Deboer, et al v Richard Snyder, et al, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Docket No. 12-CV-10285), United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Case No. 14-1341). This prohibition includes but is not limited to the acceptance of resources to appeal or otherwise contest the March 21, 2014 ruling of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, or any other ruling against the State, in Deboer v Snyder.

(3) For purposes of this section, litigation does not include the acceptance or use of resources to withdraw and dismiss the appeal or consent to the March 21, 2014 ruling of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Schor moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 335, line 10, by striking out all of section 952 and inserting:

“Sec. 952. (1) The funds appropriated in part 1 for local revenue sharing shall be used for grants to cities, villages, and townships as described in this section. The payment amount shall be the total of the calculations described in subsections (3) to (9). In order for a city, village, or township to receive a payment under this section, the city, village, or township shall comply with the accountability and transparency requirements under section 954. Payments under this section shall be distributed pursuant to section 954a.

(2) For purposes of this section, any city or village that according to the 2010 federal decennial census is determined to be located in more than 1 county shall be treated as a single entity when determining the payment received in any fiscal year.

(3) Each city, village, or township that received a payment under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128 greater than $4,500.00 shall receive 76.94644% of its total payment received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128, rounded to the nearest dollar.

(4) A taxable value payment shall be calculated for each city, village, and township as follows:

(a) Calculate the adjusted taxable value population for each city, village, and township and the statewide adjusted taxable value population in the same manner as provided for in section 913(8)(a) through (e) of the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.913.

(b) Calculate the taxable value payment rate by subtracting the total payments calculated under subsection (3) from the appropriation in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program, then dividing that difference by 3, and then dividing that result by the total statewide adjusted taxable value population as determined under subdivision (a).

(c) Calculate the taxable value payment for each city, village, and township by multiplying the taxable value payment rate as determined under subdivision (b) by the adjusted taxable value population for that city, village, or township as determined under subdivision (a).

(5) A unit type population payment shall be calculated for each city, village, and township as follows:

(a) The adjusted unit type population for each city, village, and township and the total statewide adjusted unit type population shall be determined in the same manner as provided for in section 913(9)(a) through (c) of the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.913, except that a township that provides for or makes available fire, police on a 24-hour basis either through contracting for or directly employing personnel, water to 50% or more of its residents, and sewer services to 50% or more of its residents and has a population of 10,000 or more or a township that has a population of 20,000 or more shall use the unit type population weight factor under section 913(9)(a) of the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.913, for a city with the same population as the township.

(b) The unit type population payment rate shall be calculated by subtracting the total payments calculated under subsection (3) from the appropriation in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program, then dividing that difference by 3, and then dividing that result by the total statewide adjusted unit type population as determined under subdivision (a).

(c) The unit type population payment for each city, village, and township shall be determined by multiplying the unit type population payment rate as determined under subdivision (b) by the adjusted unit type population for that city, village, or township as determined under subdivision (a).

(6) A yield equalization payment shall be calculated for each city, village, and township as follows:

(a) The guaranteed tax base shall be the maximum local per capita taxable value that can be guaranteed in a state fiscal year to each city, village, and township for a local tax effort not to exceed 0.02 if an amount determined by subtracting the total payments calculated under subsection (3) from the appropriation in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program is distributed to cities, villages, and townships whose per capita taxable value is below the guaranteed tax base.

(b) The full yield equalization payment to each city, village, and township is the product of the following amounts determined under subparagraphs (i) and (ii):

(i) An amount greater than zero that is equal to the difference between the guaranteed tax base determined in subdivision (a) and the per capita taxable value of the city, village, or township.

(ii) The local tax effort of the city, village, or township, not to exceed 0.02, multiplied by the population of that city, village, or township.

(c) The yield equalization payment is the full yield equalization payment divided by 3.

(7) A city, village, or township for which the total of the payments calculated under subsections (3), (4), (5), and (6) is less than $3,500.00 shall not receive a payment under this section. The amount not distributed under this subsection shall be redistributed to cities, villages, and townships in the manner described in subsection (8).

(8) From the amount not distributed because of the limitation imposed by subsection (7), payments shall be distributed to cities, villages, and townships with total payments under subsections (3), (4), (5), and (6) of $3,500.00 or more such that the percentage increase in the total payment under this section and section 10 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 from the payments received in the immediately preceding state fiscal year under section 10 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 and any economic vitality incentive program payment under article VIII of 2013 PA 59 to each of those cities, villages, and townships is equal to, but does not exceed, the percentage increase from the immediately preceding state fiscal year of any city, village, or township that does not receive a distribution under this subsection.

(9) The total of the payments to any city, village, or township under this section and section 10 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 shall not increase by more than 8% over the payments received in the immediately preceding state fiscal year under section 10 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 and any economic vitality incentive program payment under article VIII of 2013 PA 59. From the amount not distributed because of the limitation imposed by this subsection, payments shall be distributed to certain cities, villages, and townships with total payments under subsections (3), (4), (5), and (6) of $3,500.00 or more such that the percentage increase in the total payment under this section and section 10 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 from the payments received in the immediately preceding state fiscal year under section 10 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 and any economic vitality incentive program payment under article VIII of 2013 PA 59 to each of those cities, villages, and townships is equal to, but does not exceed, the percentage increase from the immediately preceding state fiscal year of any city, village, or township that does not receive a distribution under this subsection.

Sec. 953. The funds appropriated in part 1 for the county incentive program are to be used for grants to counties such that each county is eligible to receive an amount equal to the amount by which the balance in its revenue sharing reserve fund under section 44a of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.44a, for the county’s most recent fiscal year that ends prior to the January 1 of the state’s fiscal year is less than the amount calculated under section 44a(13) of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.44a, for the county fiscal year that begins in the state’s fiscal year. The amount calculated under this section shall be adjusted as necessary to reflect partial county fiscal years and prorated based on the total amount appropriated for distribution to all eligible counties. Payments under this section shall be distributed to an eligible county subject to the county’s fulfilling the requirements under section 954. Payments under this section shall be distributed pursuant to section 954a.

Sec. 954. Each eligible city, village, township, or county shall certify by December 1, or the first day of a payment month, that it has complied with the accountability and transparency requirement under this section. It shall certify that it has produced a citizen’s guide of its most recent local finances, including a recognition of its unfunded liabilities; a performance dashboard; a debt service report containing a detailed listing of its debt service requirements, including, at a minimum, the issuance date, issuance amount, type of debt instrument, a listing of all revenues pledged to finance debt service by debt instrument, and a listing of the annual payment amounts; and a projected budget report, including, at a minimum, the current fiscal year and a projection for the immediately following fiscal year. The projected budget report shall include revenues and expenditures and an explanation of the assumptions used for the projections. The citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report shall be made available for public viewing in the city, village, township, or county clerk’s office or posted on a publicly accessible Internet site. Each city, village, township, and county applying for a payment under this section shall submit a copy of the citizen’s guide, a copy of the performance dashboard, a copy of the debt service report, and a copy of the projected budget report to the department of treasury.

Sec. 954a. (1) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments are subject to the following conditions:

(a) In order for a city, village, township, or county to qualify for a payment under section 952 or 953, the city, village, township, or county shall meet the accountability and transparency criteria including a certification to the department that it has met the required criteria and submission of the required citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report as required by section 954. A department of treasury review of the citizen’s guide, dashboard, or reports is not required in order for a city, village, township, or county to receive a payment under section 952 or 953. The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, and counties to follow.

(b) An eligible city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of October. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under section 952 on or before December 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of the months of December, February, April, June, and August.

(c) Payments under this section shall be issued to counties until December 1. After December 1, payments shall be made to a county only if that county has complied with section 954.

(d) If a county does not provide the required certification or fails to submit the required citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report by the first day of a payment month, the county shall forfeit the payment in that payment month.

(e) Any city, village, township, or county that falsifies certification documents shall forfeit any future city, village, and township revenue sharing payments or county incentive program payments and shall repay to this state all economic vitality incentive program payments or county incentive program payments it has received under sections 952 and 953.

(f) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments under sections 952 and 953 shall be distributed on the last business day of October, December, February, April, June, and August.

(g) Payments distributed under this section may be withheld pursuant to sections 17a and 21 of the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.917a and 141.921.

(h) The department of treasury shall develop detailed guidance for an eligible city, village, township, or county to follow regarding compliance with section 954. The detailed guidance shall be posted on the department of treasury website and distributed to eligible cities, villages, townships, and counties by October 1.

(2) The unexpended funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program and the county incentive program shall be available for expenditure under the program for financially distressed cities, villages, and townships after the approval of transfers by the legislature pursuant to section 393(2) of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1393.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Dillon moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 259, following line 20, by inserting:

“Sec. 238. From the funds appropriated under this act, the department of technology, management, and budget may not expend or allow the expenditure of funds under statewide contracts in excess of $1,000,000.00 on purchasing, installing, or refurbishing office furniture, including both free-standing furniture and cubicle components. As a condition of spending funds appropriated under this act, the department of technology, management, and budget shall ensure that all executive branch departments and agencies limit expenditures on purchasing, installing, or refurbishing office furniture, including both free-standing furniture and cubicle components, so as to prevent statewide expenditures from exceeding $1,000,000.00.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Tlaib moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 386, line 9, by striking out “188,406,600” and inserting “186,777,800”.

2. Amend page 387, line 4, by striking out “246,639,000” and inserting “246,453,800”.

3. Amend page 387, line 7, by striking out “14,892,200” and inserting “14,263,000”.

4. Amend page 387, by striking out all of line 11, and inserting:

“W.J. Maxey training school—69.0 FTE positions................................................................. $ 10,724,500”.

5. Amend page 387, line 26, by striking out “5,548,700” and inserting “5,714,800”.

6. Amend page 388, line 1, by striking out “1,316,400” and inserting “2,195,500”.

7. Amend page 388, line 2, by striking out “4,414,400” and inserting “9,279,300” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

8. Amend page 441, line 11, by striking out all of section 722.

9. Amend page 441, line 15, by striking out all of section 723.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Faris moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 392, following line 3, by inserting:

“Catholic charities center for hope project............................................................................. 100”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Roberts moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 526, following line 23, by inserting:

“Sec. 232. From the funds appropriated in part 1, the department shall conduct a feasibility study, through a third-party under contract after soliciting a competitive request for proposal, regarding the establishment and operation of state veterans homes in Macomb County and Wayne County. After receipt of the feasibility study, the department shall provide copies of the study to the chairs of the appropriations committees, the subcommittees, the senate and house fiscal agencies, and the state budget office. The feasibility study shall provide for at least the following:

(a) A demographic analysis of the veterans population, including age, gender, period of service, and special medical needs.

(b) An analysis of the current, short-term, and long-term availability of long-term care services available to veterans and the general population.

(c) The potential construction and operational costs, taking into consideration the type of care and other services provided.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Roberts moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 513, line 18, by striking out “9,471,200” and inserting “12,471,200”.

2. Amend page 513, line 23, by striking out “2,000,000” and inserting “5,000,000”.

3. Amend page 514, line 5, by striking out “13,261,800” and inserting “16,261,800” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Roberts moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 534, following line 21, by inserting:

“Sec. 401a. In providing services to veterans, the MVAA shall ensure the following:

(a) That designated MVAA staff, including all MVA service officers, as well as all contracted regional coordinators and at least 1 contracted accredited VSO service officer or county veterans counselor in each service delivery region receive training on applicable federal court decisions, statutes, regulations, and directives concerning the availability of federal veterans benefits to veterans and their same sex partners.

(b) That all contracted accredited VSO service officers receive at least 2 hours of cultural and sensitivity training to help them assist veterans, irrespective of the veterans’ sexual orientation.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Phelps moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 247, following line 27, by inserting:

“City of Flint police and fire safety grant............................................................................... 5,000,000”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 333, following line 16, by inserting:

“Sec. 948. From the funds appropriated in part 1 for the city of Flint police and fire safety grant, $5,000,000.00 shall be allocated to the city of Flint on a one-time basis to support police and fire safety services.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Darany moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 368, following line 13, by inserting:

“Sec. 1049. As a condition of receiving funds in part 1, all staff of the MEDC and MSF are prohibited from advocating or lobbying any state of Michigan department or agency on behalf of a private entity.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Roberts moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 267, following line 11, by inserting:

“Sec. 406. From the funds appropriated in part 1, the director shall convene a workgroup on pay equity. The workgroup on pay equity shall develop definitions of comparable wages, using the criteria of composite skills, responsibility, effort, education or training, and working conditions. The workgroup shall hold meetings and hearings as necessary to develop definitions, models, and guidelines for employers and employees on pay equity. By September 30, 2015, the workgroup on pay equity shall present its findings and recommendations, including any recommendations for statutory changes, to the secretary of the senate, the clerk of the house of representatives, the governor, and the public.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Zemke moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 244, following line 20, by inserting:

“Michigan GED-to-school program........................................................................................ $ 600,000”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 251, following line 4, by inserting:

“(p) “GED” means general educational development.” and relettering the remaining subdivisions.

3. Amend page 253, following line 1, by inserting:

“(ww) “WDA” means workforce development agency.” and relettering the remaining subdivision.

4. Amend page 374, following line 16, by inserting:

“Sec. 1069. (1) From the funds appropriated in part 1, the workforce development agency shall administer the Michigan GED-to-school program as provided under this section.

(2) Funds appropriated in part 1 for the Michigan GED-to-school program are appropriated for the purpose of funding the cost of GED testing and certification as provided by this section. The Michigan GED-to-school program shall cover the cost of providing the GED test free of charge to individuals who meet all of the following requirements:

(a) The GED test is taken and passed on or after June 1, 2015.

(b) The individual has not previously been administered a GED test free of charge under this section.

(c) The individual meets at least 1 of the following requirements:

(i) The individual enrolls in postsecondary academic or vocational coursework at a public Michigan college or university within 2 years after passing the GED test.

(ii) Prior to taking the GED test, the individual successfully completed a WDA-approved GED preparation program.

(3) A WDA-approved GED preparation program shall include all of the following:

(a) Instructional and tutorial assistance.

(b) GED test practice.

(c) Required attendance at program instructional sessions.

(d) A curriculum that prepares students for opportunities in postsecondary education and the job market.

(e) Information on potential postsecondary and career pathways.

(f) Counseling on preparing for and applying to college.

(g) Personal and job readiness skills development.

(h) Comprehensive information on college costs and financial aid.

(i) College and career assessments.

(j) Computer-based instruction, practice, or remediation.

(4) By January 1, 2015, the workforce development agency shall post online an announcement of the Michigan GED‑to-school program, minimum standards for GED preparation program approval, and approval procedures.

(5) By April 1, 2015, the workforce development agency shall do all of the following:

(a) Develop procedures consistent with this section under which individuals can take the GED test without charge.

(b) Develop procedures for collecting payment from individuals who received the GED test under this section without charge but who failed to meet the requirements specified by subsection (2).

(c) Provide program information for educators and students on the workforce development agency website, including explanations of the procedures developed under subdivisions (a) and (b), and contact information for questions about the program.

(d) Provide an estimate of the full-year cost of the program to the senate and house appropriations subcommittees on general government, the senate and house fiscal agencies, and the state budget director.

(6) By September 30, 2015, the workforce development agency shall report to the senate and house appropriations subcommittees on general government, the senate and house fiscal agencies, and the state budget director on utilization of the GED incentive program, including numbers of GED certifications issued by location, year-to-date expenditures, and numbers of participants qualifying under subsection (2)(a), (2)(b), or both.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Graves moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 133, following line 14, by inserting:

“Sec. 436. (1) The department shall establish a workgroup with representatives from the Genesee County sheriff’s office, the city of Flint police department, and other relevant governmental agencies in Genesee County to develop and implement a long-term strategic plan to ease the county jail backlog and to gradually reduce the need for department intervention.

(2) The department shall report to the senate and house appropriations subcommittees on corrections, the senate and house fiscal agencies, and the state budget director by September 30 strategic recommendations that result from the work of the workgroup.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. McBroom moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 19, following line 15, by inserting:

“Sec. 459. It is the intent of the legislature that the department shall not conduct whole herd bovine TB testing on any 1 herd in a TB-free zone more often than every 4 years or re-test until all other herds in their county have been tested, unless involved in an epidemiological investigation, there is an outbreak within a 10 radius mile area, or is not on a verified wildlife risk mitigated premises. If there is an outbreak within a 10 radius mile area, protocols outlined by the current memorandum of understanding with the USDA shall be used.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Poleski moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 222, line 18, by striking out all of line 18.

2. Amend page 222, line 19, by striking out “3,985,200” and inserting “6,985,200”.

3. Amend page 235, line 25, by striking out “23,000,000” and inserting “20,000,000” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

4. Amend page 269, line 26, by striking out all of section 609.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Poleski moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 368, following line 13, by inserting:

“Sec. 1045. From the funds appropriated in part 1 for Pure Michigan, up to $2,000,000.00 shall be allocated for sponsorship or advertising at an annual, nationally televised sporting event located in the state of Michigan.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Haveman moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 368, following line 13, by inserting:

“Sec. 1043. Not less than 10.0% of the funds appropriated in part 1 for film incentives shall be granted to the west Michigan film office.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. MacMaster moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 647, following line 16, by inserting:

“Sec. 311. From the funds appropriated in part 1, the department shall conduct a study of the feasibility of constructing a pedestrian-only crossing over Bear River in Petoskey that would run parallel to the existing US Highway 31 crossing over Bear River.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Olumba moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 243, line 27, by striking out “108,500,000” and inserting “107,500,000”.

2. Amend page 243, following line 27, by inserting:

“Michigan heritage restoration program.................................................................................. 1,000,000”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

3. Amend page 368, following line 13, by inserting:

“Sec. 1044. From the funds appropriated in part 1 for the Michigan heritage restoration program, the fund shall establish a competitive grant program to fund restoration and preservation projects in historically designated neighborhoods throughout the state of Michigan. The program shall have the following characteristics:

(a) The fund shall designate $1,000,000.00 for neighborhood organizations registered as a 501(c)(3) organization that provide preservation or restoration services to projects within historically designated neighborhoods.

(b) Grants shall not exceed $250,000.00 for any project.

(c) Grant funds shall be used solely for historic restoration and preservation purposes.

(d) The fund shall develop detailed guidance for applicants to follow to qualify for a grant under the Michigan heritage restoration program. The detailed guidance shall be posted on the fund website by October 1.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Olumba moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 243, line 27, following “revitalization” by striking out “108,500,000” and inserting “108,499,900”.

2. Amend page 243, following line 27, by inserting:

“Detroit Farwell recreation center improvements................................................................... 100”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Farrington moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 335, line 10, by striking out all of section 952 and inserting:

“Sec. 952. (1) The funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program are to be used for grants to cities, villages, and townships such that, subject to fulfilling the requirements under subsection (3) or (4), or any combination of those subsections, each city, village, or township is eligible to receive 76.94644% of its total payment received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128 or a payment equal to the population of the city, village, or township multiplied by $7.14609, whichever is greater, rounded to the nearest dollar. If both calculations result in amounts less than $5,000.00 for any individual city, village, or township, that city, village, or township is not eligible for a payment under this section. For purposes of this subsection, population is determined in the same manner as the distribution under section 950. In addition, any city or village that according to the 2010 federal decennial census is determined to have population in more than 1 county will be treated as a single entity when determining the payment received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128 and the distribution under section 950.

(2) The funds appropriated in part 1 for the county incentive program are to be used for grants to counties such that each county is eligible to receive an amount equal to the amount by which the balance in its revenue sharing reserve fund under section 44a of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.44a, for the county’s most recent fiscal year that ends prior to the January 1 of the state’s fiscal year is less than the amount calculated under section 44a(13) of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.44a, for the county fiscal year that begins in the state’s fiscal year. The amount calculated under this subsection shall be adjusted as necessary to reflect partial county fiscal years and prorated based on the total amount appropriated for distribution to all eligible counties. Except as otherwise provided under this subsection, payments under this subsection will be distributed to an eligible county subject to the county’s fulfilling the requirements under subsection (3) or (4), or any combination of those subsections. However, a city, village, township, or county eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under this subsection or subsection (1) is exempt from the requirements of subsection (3) or (4) and shall qualify for a full payment under this subsection or subsection (1). Cities, villages, townships, and counties eligible to receive a potential payment of $50,000.00 or more from the allocation under this subsection or subsection (1) may qualify to receive payments under 1 or more of the 2 categories described under subsections (3) and (4).

(3) Category 1, accountability and transparency, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to certify by October 1, or the first day of a payment month, that it has produced a citizen’s guide of its most recent local finances, including a recognition of its unfunded liabilities; a performance dashboard; a debt service report containing a detailed listing of its debt service requirements, including, at a minimum, the issuance date, issuance amount, type of debt instrument, a listing of all revenues pledged to finance debt service by debt instrument, and a listing of the annual payment amounts; and a projected budget report, including, at a minimum, the current fiscal year and a projection for the immediately following fiscal year. The projected budget report shall include revenues and expenditures and an explanation of the assumptions used for the projections. The citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report shall be made available for public viewing in the city, village, township, or county clerk’s office or posted on a publicly accessible Internet site. Each city, village, township, and county applying for a payment under this category shall submit a copy of the citizen’s guide, a copy of the performance dashboard, a copy of the debt service report, and a copy of the projected budget report to the department of treasury.

(4) Category 2, unfunded accrued liabilities, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to certify by June 1, or the first day of a payment month for this category, that it has complied with (a) or (b):

(a) An eligible city, village, township, or county with unfunded accrued liabilities as of its most recent audited financial report related to employee pensions or other post-employment benefits shall certify that it has committed an amount equal to or greater than 5% of its total eligible payment under subsection (1) or (2) to address its unfunded accrued liabilities in fiscal year 2014-2015. The funding shall supplement and not supplant current levels of funding used to address unfunded accrued liabilities. The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, or counties to follow.

(b) Any city, village, township, or county that does not have unfunded accrued liabilities as of its most recent audited financial report related to employee pensions or other post-employment benefits shall certify to the department of treasury that it does not have unfunded accrued liabilities. The certification shall include an explanation of why the city, village, township, or county does not have unfunded accrued liabilities. The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, or counties to follow.

(5) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments are subject to the following conditions:

(a) In order for a city, village, township, or county to qualify for a category under subsection (3) or (4), the city, village, township, or county shall meet every criteria for that category, including a certification to the department that it has met the required criteria for that category and submission of the required citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report as required by subsection (3) or (4), respectively. A department of treasury review of the citizen’s guide, dashboard, or reports is not required in order for a city, village, township, or county to receive a payment under subsection (1) or (2). The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, and counties to follow. A city, village, township, or county eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under subsection (1) or (2) is exempt from having to certify that it has complied with the requirements under subsection (3) or (4) to receive its full eligible payment under subsection (1) or (2).

(b) Subject to subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), for each category that a city, village, township, or county qualifies for in subsections (3) and (4), the city, village, township, or county shall receive 1/2 of its potential payment under this section.

(c) Payments under this section shall be issued to cities, villages, and townships as follows:

(i) Category 1, an eligible city, village, or township that certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (3) by October 1 shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of October, 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of December, and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (3) after October 1, but prior to December 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of December and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (3) after December 1, but prior to February 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February. A city, village, or township eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under subsection (1) shall qualify for a payment under subsection (3) and shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of October, 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of December, and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February.

(ii) Category 2, an eligible city, village, or township that certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (4) by April 1 shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of April, 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of June, and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (4) after April 1, but prior to June 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of June and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (4) after June 1, but prior to August 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August. A city, village, or township eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under subsection (1) shall qualify for a payment under subsection (4) and shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of April, 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of June, and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August.

(d) Payments under this section shall be issued to counties for each category described in subsections (3) and (4) until the specified due date for the category. After the specified due date for the category, payments shall be made to a county only if that county has complied with subdivision (a).

(e) If a county does not provide the required certification or fails to submit the required citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report by the first day of a payment month, the county shall forfeit the payment in that payment month for the uncertified category in subsections (3) and (4). A county eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under subsection (2) is not required to certify under subsection (3) or (4) and shall qualify for its full eligible payment under subsection (2).

(f) Any city, village, township, or county that falsifies certification documents shall forfeit any future economic vitality incentive program payments or county incentive program payments and shall repay to this state all economic vitality incentive program payments or county incentive program payments it has received under this section.

(g) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments under this section shall be distributed on the last business day of October, December, February, April, June, and August.

(h) Payments distributed under this section may be withheld pursuant to sections 17a and 21 of the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.917a and 141.921.

(i) The department of treasury shall develop detailed guidance for an eligible city, village, township, or county to follow to qualify for a payment under subsections (3) and (4). The detailed guidance shall be posted on the department of treasury website and distributed to eligible cities, villages, townships, and counties by October 1.

(6) The unexpended funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program and the county incentive program shall be available for expenditure under the competitive grant assistance program after the approval of transfers by the legislature pursuant to section 393(2) of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1393.

(7) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program, $300,000.00 shall be allocated to the department of treasury for administration of the program.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Farrington moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 335, line 10, by striking out all of section 952 and inserting:

“Sec. 952. (1) The funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program are to be used for grants to cities, villages, and townships such that, subject to fulfilling the requirements under subsection (3), each city, village, or township is eligible to receive 76.94644% of its total payment received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128 or a payment equal to the population of the city, village, or township multiplied by $7.14609, whichever is greater, rounded to the nearest dollar. If both calculations result in amounts less than $5,000.00 for any individual city, village, or township, that city, village, or township is not eligible for a payment under this section. For purposes of this subsection, population is determined in the same manner as the distribution under section 950. In addition, any city or village that according to the 2010 federal decennial census is determined to have population in more than 1 county will be treated as a single entity when determining the payment received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128 and the distribution under section 950.

(2) The funds appropriated in part 1 for the county incentive program are to be used for grants to counties such that each county is eligible to receive an amount equal to the amount by which the balance in its revenue sharing reserve fund under section 44a of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.44a, for the county’s most recent fiscal year that ends prior to the January 1 of the state’s fiscal year is less than the amount calculated under section 44a(13) of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.44a, for the county fiscal year that begins in the state’s fiscal year. The amount calculated under this subsection shall be adjusted as necessary to reflect partial county fiscal years and prorated based on the total amount appropriated for distribution to all eligible counties. Except as otherwise provided under this subsection, payments under this subsection will be distributed to an eligible county subject to the county’s fulfilling the requirements under subsection (3). However, a city, village, township, or county eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under this subsection or subsection (1) is exempt from the requirements of subsection (3) and shall qualify for a full payment under this subsection or subsection (1). Cities, villages, townships, and counties eligible to receive a potential payment of $50,000.00 or more from the allocation under this subsection or subsection (1) may qualify to receive payments under subsection (3).

(3) Category 1, accountability and transparency, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to certify by October 1, or the first day of a payment month, that it has produced a citizen’s guide of its most recent local finances, including a recognition of its unfunded liabilities; a performance dashboard; a debt service report containing a detailed listing of its debt service requirements, including, at a minimum, the issuance date, issuance amount, type of debt instrument, a listing of all revenues pledged to finance debt service by debt instrument, and a listing of the annual payment amounts; and a projected budget report, including, at a minimum, the current fiscal year and a projection for the immediately following fiscal year. The projected budget report shall include revenues and expenditures and an explanation of the assumptions used for the projections. The citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report shall be made available for public viewing in the city, village, township, or county clerk’s office or posted on a publicly accessible Internet site. Each city, village, township, and county applying for a payment under this category shall submit a copy of the citizen’s guide, a copy of the performance dashboard, a copy of the debt service report, and a copy of the projected budget report to the department of treasury.

(4) Category 2, road construction or preservation, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to certify by February 1, or the first day of a payment month for this category, that it has complied with (a) or (b):

(a) For a city, village, township, or county that does not levy a specific millage for road construction or preservation, the city, village, township, or county shall certify that it has committed an amount equal to or greater than 5% of its total eligible payment under subsection (1) or (2) for road construction or preservation, as defined in section 10c of 1951 PA 51, MCL 247.660c, within the city, village, township, or county jurisdiction in fiscal year 2014-2015. If the city, village, township, or county does not have road jurisdiction, the required commitment shall be provided to the primary entity providing road construction or preservation for the city, village, township, or county jurisdiction. The funding shall supplement and not supplant the current level of road construction or preservation funding provided by the city, village, township, or county. The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, or counties to follow.

(b) For a city, village, township, or county that levies a specific millage for road construction or preservation, the city, village, township, or county shall certify that it levies a specific millage for road construction or preservation.

(5) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments are subject to the following conditions:

(a) In order for a city, village, township, or county to qualify for a category under subsection (3) or (4), the city, village, township, or county shall meet every criteria for that category, including a certification to the department that it has met the required criteria for that category and submission of the required citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report as required by subsection (3) or (4), respectively. A department of treasury review of the citizen’s guide, dashboard, or reports is not required in order for a city, village, township, or county to receive a payment under subsection (1) or (2). The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, and counties to follow. A city, village, township, or county eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under subsection (1) or (2) is exempt from having to certify that it has complied with the requirements under subsection (3) or (4) to receive its full eligible payment under subsection (1) or (2).

(b) Subject to subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), for each category that a city, village, township, or county qualifies for in subsections (3) and (4), the city, village, township, or county shall receive 1/2 of its potential payment under this section.

(c) Payments under this section shall be issued to cities, villages, and townships as follows:

(i) Category 1, an eligible city, village, or township that certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (3) by October 1 shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of October, 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of December, and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (3) after October 1, but prior to December 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of December and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (3) after December 1, but prior to February 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February. A city, village, or township eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under subsection (1) shall qualify for a payment under subsection (3) and shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of October, 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of December, and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February.

(ii) Category 2, an eligible city, village, or township that certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (4) by April 1 shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of April, 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of June, and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (4) after April 1, but prior to June 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of June and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (4) after June 1, but prior to August 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August. A city, village, or township eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under subsection (1) shall qualify for a payment under subsection (4) and shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of April, 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of June, and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August.

(d) Payments under this section shall be issued to counties for each category described in subsections (3) and (4) until the specified due date for the category. After the specified due date for the category, payments shall be made to a county only if that county has complied with subdivision (a).

(e) If a county does not provide the required certification or fails to submit the required citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report by the first day of a payment month, the county shall forfeit the payment in that payment month for the uncertified category in subsections (3) and (4). A county eligible to receive less than $50,000.00 under subsection (2) is not required to certify under subsection (3) or (4) and shall qualify for its full eligible payment under subsection (2).

(f) Any city, village, township, or county that falsifies certification documents shall forfeit any future economic vitality incentive program payments or county incentive program payments and shall repay to this state all economic vitality incentive program payments or county incentive program payments it has received under this section.

(g) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments under this section shall be distributed on the last business day of October, December, February, April, June, and August.

(h) Payments distributed under this section may be withheld pursuant to sections 17a and 21 of the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.917a and 141.921.

(i) The department of treasury shall develop detailed guidance for an eligible city, village, township, or county to follow to qualify for a payment under subsections (3) and (4). The detailed guidance shall be posted on the department of treasury website and distributed to eligible cities, villages, townships, and counties by October 1.

(6) The unexpended funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program and the county incentive program shall be available for expenditure under the competitive grant assistance program after the approval of transfers by the legislature pursuant to section 393(2) of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1393.

(7) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program, $300,000.00 shall be allocated to the department of treasury for administration of the program.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. McMillin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 173, following line 25, by inserting:

“Sec. 603. The department shall allow parents to see all data collected on their children upon request and free of charge.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. McMillin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 173, following line 25, by inserting:

“Sec. 604. The department shall not share personally identifiable data with the federal government or third party organizations.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. McMillin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 337, line 11, after “year.” by inserting “Each city, village, township, and county shall publish and make available on a publicly available website its annual report, its budget, and a listing of all expenditures, payments, or disbursements received from any source. Publication and availability of the listing of expenditures shall be on a quarterly basis, except for the annual report and salary information, which may be published and made available on an annual basis.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. McMillin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 356, following line 19, by inserting:

“Sec. 1015. As a condition of receiving funds in part 1, the MEDC shall do both of the following:

(a) Compile a report of all MEDC and MSF employee salaries and benefits. The report shall enumerate each employee and his or her annual salary and cost of benefit package individually. The report shall be distributed to the chairs of the senate and house of representatives standing committees on appropriations subcommittees on general government, the senate and house fiscal agencies, and posted on a publicly accessible Internet site by December 1.

(b) Make available on a publicly accessible Internet site a detailed online checkbook of revenues and expenditures. The online checkbook shall be updated monthly and provide a tracking of all financial transactions with individual vendors, contractual partners, grantees, recipients of business incentives, and recipients of any other form of economic assistance.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. McMillin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 248, line 2, by striking out all of line 2 and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 356, following line 19, by inserting:

“Sec. 1017. No funds appropriated to or received by the MEDC or MSF shall be expended on film incentives.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. McMillin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 614, following line 26, by inserting:

“(7) As provided under section 219, the department shall provide summary statistics for requests for emergency support team services, listing for each requesting law enforcement agency, including the department, information on the number of requests, the circumstances of those requests, and the numer of civilians and law enforcement officers injured or fatally wounded during the course of incidents to which the emergency support team responds.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. McMillin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 16, following line 18, by inserting:

“Sec. 303. (1) If, by October 1, the Michigan commission of agriculture and rural development does not rescind the generally accepted agricultural and management practices for site selection and odor control for new and expanding livestock facilities adopted by the Michigan commission of agriculture and rural development in April 2014, and revert to the generally accepted agriculture and management practices for site selection and odor control for new and expanding livestock production facilities aopted by the Michigan commission of agriculture and rural development in January 2012, the total appropriation from the general fund in part 1 shall be reduced by 20%.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. McMillin moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 173, following line 25, by inserting:

“Sec. 602. The department shall allow parents to opt their children out of student data collection.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Rendon moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 33, line 1, by striking out “1,531,500” and inserting “1,555,500”.

2. Amend page 33, line 14, by striking out “7,581,700” and inserting “7,605,700” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Rendon moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 36, line 15, by striking out “19,835,700” and inserting “20,635,700”.

2. Amend page 36, line 27, by striking out “8,518,900” and inserting “9,318,900”.

3. Amend page 77, line 24, after “support,” by striking out “$700,000.00” and inserting “$1,500,000.00”.

4. Amend page 77, line 25, after “program” by striking out “as a pilot project” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Forlini moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 479, line 3, by striking out “12,184,800” and inserting “12,019,600” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 485, following line 4, by inserting:

“Firefighter training grants...................................................................................................... 1,000,000

Fireworks safety inspection grants............................................................................................... 165,200”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

3. Amend page 485, following line 16, by inserting:

“Fireworks safety fund............................................................................................................ 1,165,200”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Hooker moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 77, line 7, by striking out all of section 1108 and inserting:

“Sec. 1108. The department shall not use state restricted funds or state general funds appropriated in part 1 in the pregnancy prevention program or family planning local agreements appropriation line items for funding to any organization that provides abortion counseling, referrals, or services. Any remaining funds not applied for, if no organization meets the above criteria, will be allocated to the local health department to provide these services.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Greimel moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 247, following line 27, by inserting:

“Waterford regional fire department grant.............................................................................. 100”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. O’Brien moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 171, following line 8, by inserting:

“Sec. 234. The department shall not enter into a contract funded under part 1 that exceeds $1,000,000.00 or seek a federal waiver from no child left behind or an amendment to a federal waiver, until after notification of the content to both the house and senate appropriations committees.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. VerHeulen moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 635, by striking out all of lines 16 and 17.

2. Amend page 635, line 18, by striking out “252,000,000” and inserting “379,000,000” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

3. Amend page 664, line 3, by striking out all of section 1001.

4. Amend page 664, line 8, after “of” by striking out “$252,000,000.00” and inserting “$379,000,000.00”.

5. Amend page 664, following line 18, by inserting:

“Sec. 1002a. Of the funds made available to the state trunkline fund through the general fund appropriation to state and local road and bridge programs in part 1, $127,000,000.00 is allocated to the state trunkline federal aid and road and bridge construction program and is intended to ensure that the state is able to match all available federal-aid highway funds.”.

The motion prevailed and the amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Singh moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 485, line 4, by striking out “9,273,900” and inserting “11,273,900” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

2. Amend page 485, line 22, by striking out “693,600” and inserting “2,693,600” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Phelps moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 247, following line 27, by inserting:

“City of Flint police and fire safety grant............................................................................... 100”

and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Howrylak moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 335, line 10, by striking out all of section 952 and inserting:

“Sec. 952. (1) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program, $243,040,000.00 shall be allocated for grants to cities, villages, and townships such that, subject to fulfilling the requirements under subsections (3), (4), and (5), or any combination of those subsections, or subsection (8), each city, village, or township that received a payment under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128 greater than $4,500.00 is eligible to receive a maximum of 78.51044% of its total payment received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128, rounded to the nearest dollar. For purposes of this subsection, any city, village, or township that completely merges with another city, village, or township will be treated as a single entity, such that when determining the payment received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128 for the combined single entity, the amount each of the merging local units received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128 is summed. For the purposes of this subsection, any city or village that according to the 2010 federal decennial census is determined to have population in more than 1 county will be treated as a single entity when determining the payment received under section 950(2) of 2009 PA 128. Cities, villages, and townships eligible to receive a potential payment from the allocation under this subsection may qualify to receive payments under either 1 or more of the 3 categories described under subsections (3), (4), and (5), or under subsection (8).

(2) The funds appropriated in part 1 for the county incentive program are to be used for grants to counties such that each county is eligible to receive an amount equal to the amount by which the balance in its revenue sharing reserve fund under section 44a of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.44a, for the county’s most recent fiscal year that ends prior to the January 1 of the state’s fiscal year is less than the amount calculated under section 44a(13) of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.44a, for the county fiscal year that begins in the state’s fiscal year. The amount calculated under this subsection shall be adjusted as necessary to reflect partial county fiscal years and prorated based on the total amount appropriated for distribution to all eligible counties. Counties eligible to receive a potential payment from the allocation under this subsection may qualify to receive payments under either 1 or more of the 3 categories described under subsections (3), (4), and (5), or under subsection (8).

(3) Category 1, accountability and transparency, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to certify by October 1, or the first day of a payment month, that it has produced a citizen’s guide of its most recent local finances, including a recognition of its unfunded liabilities; a performance dashboard including a cost per resident of unfunded accrued liabilities; a debt service report containing a detailed listing of its debt service requirements, including, at a minimum, the issuance date, issuance amount, type of debt instrument, a listing of all revenues pledged to finance debt service by debt instrument, and a listing of the annual payment amounts until maturity; and a projected budget report, including, at a minimum, the current fiscal year and a projection for the immediately following fiscal year. The projected budget report shall include revenues and expenditures and an explanation of the assumptions used for the projections. The citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report shall be made available for public viewing in the city, village, township, or county clerk’s office or posted on a publicly accessible Internet site. Each city, village, township, and county applying for a payment under this category shall submit a copy of the citizen’s guide, a copy of the performance dashboard, a copy of the debt service report, and a copy of the projected budget report to the department of treasury.

(4) Category 2, consolidation of services, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to certify by February 1, or the first day of a payment month for this category, that it has produced a consolidation plan. The consolidation plan shall be made available for public viewing in the city, village, township, or county clerk’s office or posted on a publicly accessible Internet site. Each city, village, township, and county applying for a payment under this category shall submit a copy of the consolidation plan to the department of treasury. At a minimum, the consolidation plan shall include the following:

(a) For a city, village, township, or county that is submitting a consolidation plan for the first time, the plan shall include, but not be limited to, a listing of any previous service cooperations, collaborations, consolidations, innovations, or privatizations with an estimated cost savings amount for each cooperation, collaboration, consolidation, innovation, or privatization. In addition, the plan shall include, but not be limited to, 1 or more new proposals to increase its existing level of cooperation, collaboration, consolidation, innovation, or privatization either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions, an estimate of the potential savings amount, and an estimated timeline for implementing the new proposal.

(b) For a city, village, township, or county that submitted a consolidation plan in a previous fiscal year, the plan shall include, but not be limited to, an update on the status of all new proposals that were in the consolidation plan most recently submitted, including whether or not the previously proposed plans have been fully implemented, a listing of the barriers experienced in implementing the proposals, and an estimated timeline to accomplish the proposed plans. In addition, the plan shall include, but not be limited to, 1 or more new proposals to increase its existing level of cooperation, collaboration, consolidation, innovation, or privatization either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions, or a detailed explanation of why increasing its existing level of cooperation, collaboration, consolidation, innovation, or privatization is not feasible. The new proposal shall include but not be limited to, an estimate of the potential savings amount and an estimated timeline for implementing the new proposals.

(5) Category 3, unfunded accrued liability plan, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to certify by June 1, or the first day of a payment month for this category, that it has complied with 1 of the following:

(a) An eligible city, village, township, or county with unfunded accrued liabilities as of its most recent audited financial report related to employee pensions or other post-employment benefits shall submit a plan to lower all unfunded accrued liabilities. The plan shall include a listing of all previous actions taken to reduce its unfunded accrued liabilities with an estimated cost savings of those actions; a detailed description of how it will continue to implement and maintain previous actions taken; and a listing of additional actions it could implement. If no previous actions have been taken to reduce its unfunded accrued liabilities, it shall provide a detailed explanation of why no actions have been taken and a listing of actions it could implement to reduce unfunded accrued liabilities. Actuarial assumption changes and issuance of debt instruments shall not qualify as a new action.

The unfunded accrued liabilities plan shall be made available for public viewing in the city, village, township, or county clerk’s office or posted on a publicly accessible Internet site. The city, village, township, or county shall submit the plan to the department of treasury and certify that its plan is publicly accessible.

(b) An eligible city, village, township, or county that does not have unfunded accrued liabilities as of its most recent audited financial report related to employee pensions or other post-employment benefits shall certify to the department of treasury by June 1, or the first day of a payment month for this category, that it does not have unfunded accrued liabilities. The certification shall include an explanation of why the city, village, township, or county does not have unfunded accrued liabilities.

The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, or counties to follow.

(6) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments under subsections (3), (4), or (5) are subject to the following conditions:

(a) In order for a city, village, township, or county to qualify for a category under subsection (3), (4), or (5), the city, village, township, or county shall meet every criteria for that category, including a certification to the department that it has met the required criteria for that category and submission of the required citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, and projected budget report; consolidation plan; or the unfunded accrued liability plan, as required by subsection (3), (4), or (5), respectively. A department of treasury review of the citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, projected budget report, consolidation plan, or unfunded accrued liability plan is not required in order for a city, village, township, or county to receive a payment under subsection (1) or (2).

The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, and counties to follow.

(b) Subject to subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), for each category that a city, village, township, or county qualifies for in subsections (3), (4), and (5), the city, village, township, or county shall receive 1/3 of its potential payment under this section.

(c) Payments qualified for under subsections (3), (4), or (5) shall be issued to cities, villages, and townships as follows:

(i) Category 1, an eligible city, village, or township that certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (3) by October 1 shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of October and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of December. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (3) after October 1, but on or before December 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of December.

(ii) Category 2, an eligible city, village, or township that certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (4) by February 1 shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of February and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of April. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (4) after February 1, but on or before April 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of April.

(iii) Category 3, an eligible city, village, or township that certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (5) by June 1 shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of June and 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August. If an eligible city, village, or township certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (5) after June 1, but on or before August 1, the city, village, or township shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of August.

(d) Payments qualified for under subsections (3), (4), or (5) shall be issued to counties for each category described in subsections (3), (4), and (5) until the specified due date for the category. After the specified due date for the category, payments shall be made to a county only if that county has complied with subdivision (a).

(e) If a county does not provide the required certification or fails to submit the required citizen’s guide, performance dashboard, debt service report, projected budget report, consolidation plan, or unfunded accrued liability plan by the first day of a payment month, the county shall forfeit the payment in that payment month for the uncertified category in subsections (3), (4), and (5).

(7) The unexpended funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program and the county incentive program shall be available for expenditure under the competitive grant assistance program after the approval of transfers by the legislature pursuant to section 393(2) of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1393.

(8) Notwithstanding the requirements that must be met in order to qualify for funding under 1 or more of the 3 categories described under subsections (3), (4), and (5), and the conditions for payments under subsection (6), an eligible city, village, township, or county may receive its full payment from the allocation under subsections (1) or (2) upon certifying to the department of treasury by October 1 that the city, village, township, or county has met the requirements of subdivisions (a), (b), (c), and (d). A copy of the certification form submitted to the department of treasury shall be made available for public viewing in the city, village, township, or county clerk’s office or posted on a publicly accessible Internet site. To comply with this subsection, a city, village, township, or county must meet all of the following:

(a) Standard 1, budget reserve, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to have an unrestricted general fund balance, as of the most recently audited financial report, that is equal to or greater than 6% of the most recently adopted general fund budgeted expenditures, which may be reserved in a budget stabilization fund created pursuant to 1978 PA 30, MCL 141.441 to 141.445.

(b) Standard 2, pension plans, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to comply with either (i) or (ii).

(i) The city, village, township, or county offers one or more defined benefit pension plans to employees or elected public officials. The employer’s defined benefit plan contributions, as of the most recently audited financial report, are equal to or greater than the annual required contribution amounts determined by the actuarial valuation used for the most recently audited financial report.

(ii) The city, village, township, or county does not offer defined benefit pension plans to its employees or elected public officials.

(c) Standard 3, other post-employment benefits, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to comply with either (i) or (ii).

(i) The city, village, township, or county offers one or more other post-employment benefit plans including, but not limited to, health, dental, vision, and life insurance coverage, to employees or elected public officials upon retirement or separation from service. The employer’s contributions, as of the most recently audited financial report, are equal to or greater than the annual required contribution amounts determined by the actuarial valuation used for the most recently audited financial report. For other post-employment benefit plans with fewer than 100 participants, the employer’s contributions are equal to or greater than the annual required contribution amount as determined under an alternative method recommended by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. For purposes of this subdivision, participants are defined as current employees, terminated employees that have accumulated benefits but are not currently receiving benefits, and retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits.

(ii) The city, village, township, or county does not offer other post-employment benefit plans to its employees or elected public officials upon retirement or separation from service.

(d) Standard 4, bond or credit rating, requires each eligible city, village, township, or county to comply with either (i) or (ii).

(i) The city, village, township, or county’s most current general obligation debt bond or credit rating, as assigned by at least two of three rating agencies, is no less than a rating of Aa3 from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.; a rating of AA- from Fitch Investors Service, Inc.; or a rating of AA- from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group; or an equivalent rating from any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization as determined by the state treasurer.

(ii) The city, village, township, or county does not have general obligation debt outstanding.

(9) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments under subsection (8) are subject to the following conditions:

(a) In order for a city, village, township, or county to qualify under subsection (8), the city, village, township, or county shall meet each criteria for subsection (8), and submit a certification to the department of treasury by October 1. A department of treasury review of a city, village, township, or county’s compliance with the requirements is not required in order for a city, village, township, or county to receive a payment under subsection (1) or (2). The department shall develop a certification process and method for cities, villages, townships, and counties to follow.

(b) An eligible city, village, township, or county that certifies with the department of treasury that it has qualified for a payment under subsection (8) by October 1 shall receive 1/6 of its available distribution on the last business day of October, December, February, April, June, and August.

(10) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments issued under this section are subject to the following conditions:

(a) An eligible city, village, township, or county that falsifies certification documents shall forfeit any future economic vitality incentive program payments or county incentive program payments and shall repay to this state all economic vitality incentive program payments or county incentive program payments it has received under this section.

(b) Economic vitality incentive program payments and county incentive program payments under this section shall be distributed on the last business day of October, December, February, April, June, and August.

(c) Payments distributed under this section may be withheld pursuant to sections 17a and 21 of the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.917a and 141.921.

(d) The department of treasury shall develop detailed guidance for an eligible city, village, township, or county to follow to qualify for a payment under subsections (3), (4), and (5), or subsection (8). The detailed guidance shall be posted on the department of treasury website and distributed to eligible cities, villages, townships, and counties by October 1.

Sec. 953. (1) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program, $28,500,000.00 is appropriated for supplemental payments to cities, villages, and townships that are otherwise eligible for economic vitality incentive program grants, as determined under section 952(1), and distributed on a population basis according to this section.

(2) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for the economic vitality incentive program, $300,000.00 shall be allocated to the department of treasury to administer the supplemental payments program.

(3) Each eligible city, village, or township may receive a 10 percent population adjustment for meeting one or more of the following criteria, with a maximum population adjustment increase of 40 percent:

(a) Upon certification with the department of treasury by October 1, under section 952(8), that the city, village, or township has met the budget reserve, defined benefit pension plan contributions, other post-employment benefit contributions, and bond or credit rating standards, the city, village, or township shall receive a 10% population adjustment increase.

(b) Each eligible city, village, or township that is in the top 25 percent of Michigan communities with populations of 5,000 or more, based on violent crime rates reported to the Michigan department of state police, shall receive a 10% population adjustment increase.

(c) Each eligible city, village, or township that is in the top 25 percent of Michigan communities with populations of 20,000 or more, based on jobless rate published by the United States census bureau, shall receive a 10% population adjustment increase.

(d) Each eligible city, village, or township that has a deficit elimination plan approved by the department of treasury shall receive a 10% population adjustment increase, not to exceed 24 months.

(4) Payments under this section shall be distributed to an eligible city, village, or township by the department of treasury based on the following:

(a) An eligible city, village, or township shall receive a pro rata share of the allocation under subsection (1) based upon the population of an eligible city, village, or township as defined under section 3 of the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.903 and as adjusted under subsection (3), relative to the total adjusted population for all eligible cities, villages, and townships. If the supplemental payment amount calculated under this section for an eligible city, village, or township is less than $5,000.00, no payment will be distributed.

(b) All funds not distributed under subsection 4(a) shall be redistributed to eligible cities, villages, or townships calculated to receive a payment under subsection 4(a) equal to or greater than $5,000.00. The redistribution shall be based upon the population of an eligible city, village, or township as defined under the Glenn Steil state revenue sharing act of 1971, 1971 PA 140, MCL 141.903 and as adjusted under subsection (3) relative to the total adjusted population for all eligible cities, villages, and townships.

(5) The department of treasury shall determine the method of payment for supplemental payments and define the data sources to be used in adjusting the population of an eligible city, village, or township under subsection (3).

(6) Unexpended funds appropriated for economic vitality incentive program supplemental payments are designated as work project appropriations, and any unencumbered or unallotted funds shall not lapse at the end of the fiscal year and shall be available for expenditure for projects under this section until the projects have been completed. The following is in compliance with section 451a of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1451a:

(a) The purpose of the project is to provide grants to recipients under this section.

(b) The projects will be accomplished by grants to qualified cities, villages, and townships.

(c) The total estimated cost of all projects is $28,500,000.00.

(d) The tentative completion date is September 30, 2019.”.

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Howrylak moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 29, following line 6, by inserting:

“Interpretive and clinician services for deaf, deaf/blind, and hard of hearing populations...... 100”.

2. Amend page 29, line 7, by striking out “90,491,200” and inserting “90,491,300”.

3. Amend page 29, line 16, by striking out “29,495,700” and inserting “29,495,800” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Howrylak moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 28, line 9, by striking out “180.7” and inserting “181.7”.

2. Amend page 28, line 10, by striking out “27,088,800” and inserting “27,183,800” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

Rep. Haveman moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.

The motion prevailed.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be placed on its immediate passage.

The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

______

Rep. Schor moved that Rep. Cavanagh be excused from the balance of today’s session.

The motion prevailed.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Third Reading of Bills

House Bill No. 5313, entitled

A bill to make, supplement, adjust, and consolidate appropriations for various state departments and agencies, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015 and other fiscal years; to provide for certain conditions on appropriations; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 205 Yeas—92

Abed Geiss Leonard Rendon

Banks Glardon Lipton Rogers

Bolger Graves Lori Rutledge

Brinks Greimel Lund Santana

Brown Haines Lyons Schmidt

Brunner Haugh MacGregor Schor

Bumstead Haveman McBroom Shirkey

Callton Heise McCann Slavens

Clemente Hobbs McCready Smiley

Cochran Jacobsen Muxlow Somerville

Cotter Jenkins Nathan Stallworth

Crawford Kelly Nesbitt Stamas

Daley Kesto O’Brien Stanley

Darany Kivela Oakes Talabi

Denby Knezek Olumba Tlaib

Dianda Kosowski Outman Townsend

Dillon Kowall Pagel VerHeulen

Driskell Kurtz Pettalia Victory

Durhal LaFontaine Phelps Walsh

Faris Lamonte Poleski Yanez

Farrington Lane Potvin Yonker

Forlini Lauwers Price Zemke

Foster LaVoy Pscholka Zorn

Nays—17

Barnett Hovey-Wright Kandrevas Robinson

Franz Howrylak MacMaster Segal

Genetski Irwin McMillin Singh

Goike Johnson Roberts Switalski

Hooker

In The Chair: Cotter

The question being on agreeing to the title of the bill,

Rep. Stamas moved to amend the title to read as follows:

A bill to make, supplement, adjust, and consolidate appropriations for various state departments and agencies, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015 and other fiscal years; to provide for certain conditions on appropriations; to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations; and to repeal acts and parts of acts.

The motion prevailed.

The House agreed to the title as amended.

Rep. Stamas moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

______

Rep. Stamas moved that House Committees be given leave to meet during the balance of today’s session.

The motion prevailed.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Announcement by the Clerk of Printing and Enrollment

The Clerk announced that the following bills had been printed and placed upon the files of the members on Friday, May 2:

House Bill Nos. 5507 5508 5509 5510 5511 5512 5513 5514 5515 5516

Senate Bill Nos. 919 920 921 922 923 924 925

The Clerk announced the enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor on Monday, May 5, for his approval of the following bill:

Enrolled House Bill No. 4962 at 3:06 p.m.

The Clerk announced that the following Senate bills had been received on Tuesday, May 6:

Senate Bill Nos. 741 742 762 763 768 777

Reports of Standing Committees

The Committee on Education, by Rep. Lyons, Chair, reported

House Bill No. 5223, entitled

A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled “The revised school code,” by amending section 1249 (MCL 380.1249), as amended by 2011 PA 102, and by adding section 1531j.

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-4) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

The bill and substitute were referred to the order of Second Reading of Bills.

Favorable Roll Call

To Report Out:

Yeas: Reps. Lyons, Franz, Crawford, Jacobsen, Price, Yonker, Knezek, Brinks and Lamonte

Nays: Reps. Genetski, Lund and McMillin

The Committee on Education, by Rep. Lyons, Chair, reported

House Bill No. 5224, entitled

A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled “The revised school code,” (MCL 380.1 to 380.1852) by adding section 1249b.

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-4) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

The bill and substitute were referred to the order of Second Reading of Bills.

Favorable Roll Call

To Report Out:

Yeas: Reps. Lyons, Franz, Crawford, Jacobsen, Price, Yonker, Knezek, Brinks and Lamonte

Nays: Reps. Genetski, Lund and McMillin

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE REPORT

The following report, submitted by Rep. Lyons, Chair, of the Committee on Education, was received and read:

Meeting held on: Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Present: Reps. Lyons, Franz, Crawford, Genetski, Lund, McMillin, Hooker, Jacobsen, Price, Yonker, Lipton, Knezek, Brinks, Lamonte and Abed

Absent: Reps. Daley and Stallworth

Excused: Reps. Daley and Stallworth

The Committee on Energy and Technology, by Rep. Nesbitt, Chair, reported

House Bill No. 5476, entitled

A bill to amend 1939 PA 3, entitled “An act to provide for the regulation and control of public and certain private utilities and other services affected with a public interest within this state; to provide for alternative energy suppliers; to provide for licensing; to include municipally owned utilities and other providers of energy under certain provisions of this act; to create a public service commission and to prescribe and define its powers and duties; to abolish the Michigan public utilities commission and to confer the powers and duties vested by law on the public service commission; to provide for the continuance, transfer, and completion of certain matters and proceedings; to abolish automatic adjustment clauses; to prohibit certain rate increases without notice and hearing; to qualify residential energy conservation programs permitted under state law for certain federal exemption; to create a fund; to provide for a restructuring of the manner in which energy is provided in this state; to encourage the utilization of resource recovery facilities; to prohibit certain acts and practices of providers of energy; to allow for the securitization of stranded costs; to reduce rates; to provide for appeals; to provide appropriations; to declare the effect and purpose of this act; to prescribe remedies and penalties; and to repeal acts and parts of acts,” by amending section 11 (MCL 460.11), as added by 2008 PA 286.

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-4) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

The bill and substitute were referred to the order of Second Reading of Bills.

Favorable Roll Call

To Report Out:

Yeas: Reps. Nesbitt, Shirkey, Farrington, Franz, Jacobsen, Outman, Pettalia, Price, Schmidt, Zorn, Graves, Lauwers, Howrylak, Stallworth, Hobbs, Nathan, LaVoy, Lane, Brunner, Yanez and Phelps

Nays: None

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE REPORT

The following report, submitted by Rep. Nesbitt, Chair, of the Committee on Energy and Technology, was received and read:

Meeting held on: Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Present: Reps. Nesbitt, Shirkey, Farrington, Franz, Jacobsen, Outman, Pettalia, Price, Schmidt, Zorn, Graves, Lauwers, Howrylak, Stallworth, Hobbs, Nathan, LaVoy, Lane, Brunner, Yanez, Lamonte and Phelps

The Committee on Natural Resources, by Rep. LaFontaine, Chair, reported

Senate Bill No. 869, entitled

A bill to amend 1994 PA 451, entitled “Natural resources and environmental protection act,” by amending section 48716 (MCL 324.48716), as added by 1995 PA 57.

Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.

The bill was referred to the order of Second Reading of Bills.

Favorable Roll Call

To Report Out:

Yeas: Reps. LaFontaine, Rendon, Goike, Johnson, McBroom, Victory, Smiley, Dianda and Kivela

Nays: None

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE REPORT

The following report, submitted by Rep. LaFontaine, Chair, of the Committee on Natural Resources, was received and read:

Meeting held on: Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Present: Reps. LaFontaine, Rendon, Goike, Johnson, McBroom, Victory, Smiley, Dianda and Kivela

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE REPORT

The following report, submitted by Rep. Crawford, Chair, of the Committee on Regulatory Reform, was received and read:

Meeting held on: Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Present: Reps. Crawford, McBroom, Denby, McMillin, LaFontaine, Rendon, Yonker, Kelly, Kesto, Haugh, Abed, Stanley, Dianda, Nathan and Schor

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE REPORT

The following report, submitted by Rep. Schmidt, Chair, of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, was received and read:

Meeting held on: Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Present: Reps. Schmidt, Glardon, Daley, Heise, Jacobsen, O’Brien, Pettalia, Lauwers, McCready, Lane, Dianda, Rutledge, Driskell, Cochran and Smiley

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE REPORT

The following report, submitted by Rep. Haines, Chair, of the Committee on Health Policy, was received and read:

Meeting held on: Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Present: Reps. Haines, Callton, Crawford, Genetski, Shirkey, Hooker, Yonker, Zorn, Graves, Kesto, Howrylak, Darany, Knezek, Segal, Stallworth, Brinks, Cavanagh and Phelps

Absent: Rep. Foster

Excused: Rep. Foster

Messages from the Senate

Senate Bill No. 741, entitled

A bill to amend 1978 PA 368, entitled “Public health code,” by amending section 16181 (MCL 333.16181), as amended by 2014 PA 41.

The Senate has passed the bill.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Senate Bill No. 742, entitled

A bill to amend 1980 PA 299, entitled “Occupational code,” by amending section 213 (MCL 339.213).

The Senate has passed the bill.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Senate Bill No. 762, entitled

A bill to amend 1979 PA 94, entitled “The state school aid act of 1979,” by amending sections 201, 201a, 202a, 206, 209, 210b, 217, 224, 225, 229, 229a, 229b, and 230 (MCL 388.1801, 388.1801a, 388.1802a, 388.1806, 388.1809, 388.1810b, 388.1817, 388.1824, 388.1825, 388.1829, 388.1829a, 388.1829b, and 388.1830), sections 201, 201a, 206, 209, 224, 225, 229, 229a, and 230 as amended and sections 210b and 229b as added by 2013 PA 60 and section 217 as amended and section 202a as added by 2012 PA 201, and by adding sections 207a, 207b, and 207c.

The Senate has passed the bill.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Senate Bill No. 763, entitled

A bill to make appropriations for the department of community health for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.

The Senate has passed the bill.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Senate Bill No. 768, entitled

A bill to amend 1979 PA 94, entitled “The state school aid act of 1979,” by amending sections 236, 236a, 236b, 236c, 241, 245, 252, 256, 263, 263a, 264, 265, 265a, 267, 268, 269, 270, 272a, 273, 274, 274a, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, and 284 (MCL 388.1836, 388.1836a, 388.1836b, 388.1836c, 388.1841, 388.1845, 388.1852, 388.1856, 388.1863, 388.1863a, 388.1864, 388.1865, 388.1865a, 388.1867, 388.1868, 388.1869, 388.1870, 388.1872a, 388.1873, 388.1874, 388.1874a, 388.1876, 388.1877, 388.1878, 388.1879, 388.1880, 388.1881, 388.1882, 388.1883, and 388.1884), sections 236, 236a, 236b, 241, 245, 252, 263, 263a, 264, 265, 265a, 267, 268, 269, 270, 273, 274, 274a, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, and 282 as amended and sections 236c and 272a as added by 2013 PA 60 and sections 256, 283, and 284 as amended by 2012 PA 201, and by adding section 271a and 271b.

The Senate has passed the bill.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Senate Bill No. 777, entitled

A bill to make appropriations for the state transportation department for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.

The Senate has passed the bill.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Notices

May 6, 2014

Mr. Gary L. Randall, Clerk

Michigan House of Representatives

State Capitol Building

Lansing, Michigan 48913

Dear Mr. Clerk:

I hereby make the following appointments to the House Special Committee on Detroit’s recovery and Michigan’s future:

Reps. (C) Walsh, (Maj. VC) Poleski, McCready, (Min. VC) Stallworth III, Santana

Sincerely,

Jase Bolger, Speaker

Michigan House of Representatives

Communications from State Officers

The following communication from the Department of State Police was received and read:

May 1, 2014

Enclosed is the FY13 Annual Report and Evaluation for the Secondary Road Patrol and Traffic Accident Prevention Program.

This report satisfies the reporting requirements contained in Public Act 416 of 1978, as amended. Copies of this report are transmitted to the Governor’s Office, Clerk of the House, Secretary of the Senate, Chair of the House Appropriations Committee, Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, each county sheriff, the Michigan Sheriffs’ Association, and the Deputy Sheriff’s Association of Michigan.

The report will be accessible on our web site at www.michigan.gov/ohsp .

Should you have any questions about this report, please contact Mr. Spencer Simmons at (517) 241-2556.

Sincerely,

Michael L. Prince, Director

Office of Highway Safety Planning

The communication was referred to the Clerk.

Introduction of Bills

Reps. Banks, Darany, Lipton and Brown introduced

House Bill No. 5517, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2111f.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Hovey-Wright, Cochran, Banks, Slavens, Segal, LaVoy, Geiss, Abed, Darany, Lipton, Dianda, Driskell, Cavanagh, Phelps, Smiley, Faris, Durhal, Oakes, Hobbs, Rutledge and Brown introduced

House Bill No. 5518, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2026c.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Brinks, Dillon, Darany, Knezek, Segal, Oakes, Hobbs, Rutledge, Slavens, LaVoy, Faris, Phelps, Lipton and Brown introduced

House Bill No. 5519, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2203.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Abed, Cochran, LaVoy, Lamonte, Brinks, Driskell, Hovey-Wright, Oakes, Hobbs, Rutledge, Slavens, Faris, Phelps, Darany, Lipton and Brown introduced

House Bill No. 5520, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 3149.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Irwin, Hobbs, Slavens, LaVoy, Faris, Phelps, Lipton, Darany, Brown and Oakes introduced

House Bill No. 5521, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2027c.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Irwin, Hobbs, Rutledge, Slavens, LaVoy, Faris, Phelps, Lipton, Darany, Brown and Oakes introduced

House Bill No. 5522, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2027a.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Lipton, Hovey-Wright, Segal, Hobbs, Rutledge, LaVoy, Slavens, Phelps, Faris, Darany, Brown and Oakes introduced

House Bill No. 5523, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2027d.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Dianda, Driskell, Cochran, Segal, Hobbs, Rutledge, LaVoy, Slavens, Phelps, Faris, Darany, Lipton, Brown and Oakes introduced

House Bill No. 5524, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” by amending sections 2109, 2115, 2403, and 2603 (MCL 500.2109, 500.2115, 500.2403, and 500.2603), section 2115 as amended by 1980 PA 461 and section 2403 as amended by 1993 PA 200.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Cochran, Driskell, Lamonte, Brinks, Dillon, Irwin, Switalski, Cavanagh, Geiss, LaVoy, Kandrevas, Roberts, Singh, Slavens, Segal, Abed, Stanley, Dianda, Hobbs, Rutledge, Phelps, Faris, Lipton, Darany and Brown introduced

House Bill No. 5525, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2027b.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Segal, Hobbs, Rutledge, LaVoy, Slavens, Phelps, Faris, Lipton, Darany and Brown introduced

House Bill No. 5526, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2035.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Segal, Cochran, Abed, Stanley, Driskell, Dianda, Lamonte, Hobbs, Rutledge, LaVoy, Slavens, Phelps, Faris, Lipton, Darany and Brown introduced

House Bill No. 5527, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2035a.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Reps. Stallworth, Hobbs, Rutledge, LaVoy, Slavens, Phelps, Faris, Lipton, Darany and Brown introduced

House Bill No. 5528, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 2111f.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Rep. Jenkins introduced

House Bill No. 5529, entitled

A bill to amend 1961 PA 236, entitled “Revised judicature act of 1961,” by amending section 1074 (MCL 600.1074), as added by 2004 PA 224.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Rep. Poleski introduced

House Bill No. 5530, entitled

A bill to amend 1927 PA 175, entitled “The code of criminal procedure,” by amending section 14 of chapter XI (MCL 771.14), as amended by 2012 PA 27.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Rep. Kurtz introduced

House Bill No. 5531, entitled

A bill to amend 1961 PA 236, entitled “Revised judicature act of 1961,” (MCL 600.101 to 600.9947) by adding section 1085.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Rep. Graves introduced

House Bill No. 5532, entitled

A bill to amend 1953 PA 232, entitled “Corrections code of 1953,” by amending section 36 (MCL 791.236), as amended by 2012 PA 623.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Rep. Schmidt introduced

House Bill No. 5533, entitled

A bill to amend 1927 PA 175, entitled “The code of criminal procedure,” by amending section 3 of chapter XI (MCL 771.3), as amended by 2012 PA 612.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Rep. Shirkey introduced

House Bill No. 5534, entitled

A bill to amend 1939 PA 280, entitled “The social welfare act,” by amending sections 57 and 57b (MCL 400.57 and 400.57b), as amended by 2011 PA 131.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Rep. Muxlow introduced

House Bill No. 5535, entitled

A bill to amend 1939 PA 280, entitled “The social welfare act,” (MCL 400.1 to 400.119b) by adding section 10g.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs.

Reps. McMillin, Lori, Hooker, Lauwers, Daley, Goike, Johnson, Kelly, Genetski, Yonker, Muxlow, Callton and Howrylak introduced

House Bill No. 5536, entitled

A bill to amend 1939 PA 280, entitled “The social welfare act,” by amending section 57i (MCL 400.57i), as amended by 2011 PA 131, and by adding sections 14k and 57w.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Families, Children, and Seniors.

Reps. Geiss, LaVoy, Kandrevas and Heise introduced

House Bill No. 5537, entitled

A bill to amend 1931 PA 328, entitled “The Michigan penal code,” (MCL 750.1 to 750.568) by adding section 411x.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Criminal Justice.

Reps. Durhal, Phelps, Brunner, Smiley, Cavanagh, Townsend, Faris, Tlaib, Rutledge, Roberts, Zemke, Stallworth, Lori, Jacobsen, Somerville, Kelly, Stanley, Talabi and Greimel introduced

House Bill No. 5538, entitled

A bill to amend 1927 PA 175, entitled “The code of criminal procedure,” by amending section 11b of chapter XVII (MCL 777.11b), as amended by 2012 PA 124.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Reps. Durhal, Phelps, Brunner, Smiley, Cavanagh, Townsend, Faris, Tlaib, Rutledge, Roberts, Zemke, Stallworth, Lori, Jacobsen, Stanley, Talabi and Greimel introduced

House Bill No. 5539, entitled

A bill to require persons convicted of certain stalking offenses to register; to prescribe the powers and duties of certain departments and agencies in connection with that registration; and to prescribe fees, penalties, and sanctions.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Reps. Durhal, Tlaib, Brunner, Smiley, Cavanagh, Phelps, Townsend, Faris, Rutledge, Lipton, Hovey-Wright, Robinson, Heise, Stallworth, Lori, Jacobsen, Victory, Potvin, Stanley, Talabi and Greimel introduced

House Bill No. 5540, entitled

A bill to amend 1931 PA 328, entitled “The Michigan penal code,” (MCL 750.1 to 750.568) by adding section 377d.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Criminal Justice.

Reps. Dianda, Pettalia, Goike, Kelly, Kivela, Singh, Brunner, Smiley, Haugh and Kosowski introduced

House Bill No. 5541, entitled

A bill to amend 1998 PA 58, entitled “Michigan liquor control code of 1998,” by amending section 541 (MCL 436.1541), as amended by 2008 PA 489.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Regulatory Reform.

Reps. Dianda, Pettalia, Lane, Bumstead, Goike, Genetski, Graves, Kelly, Singh and Haugh introduced

House Bill No. 5542, entitled

A bill to amend 1951 PA 51, entitled “An act to provide for the classification of all public roads, streets, and highways in this state, and for the revision of that classification and for additions to and deletions from each classification; to set up and establish the Michigan transportation fund; to provide for the deposits in the Michigan transportation fund of specific taxes on motor vehicles and motor vehicle fuels; to provide for the allocation of funds from the Michigan transportation fund and the use and administration of the fund for transportation purposes; to promote safe and efficient travel for motor vehicle drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians, and other legal users of roads, streets, and highways; to set up and establish the truck safety fund; to provide for the allocation of funds from the truck safety fund and administration of the fund for truck safety purposes; to set up and establish the Michigan truck safety commission; to establish certain standards for road contracts for certain businesses; to provide for the continuing review of transportation needs within the state; to authorize the state transportation commission, counties, cities, and villages to borrow money, issue bonds, and make pledges of funds for transportation purposes; to authorize counties to advance funds for the payment of deficiencies necessary for the payment of bonds issued under this act; to provide for the limitations, payment, retirement, and security of the bonds and pledges; to provide for appropriations and tax levies by counties and townships for county roads; to authorize contributions by townships for county roads; to provide for the establishment and administration of the state trunk line fund, local bridge fund, comprehensive transportation fund, and certain other funds; to provide for the deposits in the state trunk line fund, critical bridge fund, comprehensive transportation fund, and certain other funds of money raised by specific taxes and fees; to provide for definitions of public transportation functions and criteria; to define the purposes for which Michigan transportation funds may be allocated; to provide for Michigan transportation fund grants; to provide for review and approval of transportation programs; to provide for submission of annual legislative requests and reports; to provide for the establishment and functions of certain advisory entities; to provide for conditions for grants; to provide for the issuance of bonds and notes for transportation purposes; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state and local agencies and officials; to provide for the making of loans for transportation purposes by the state transportation department and for the receipt and repayment by local units and agencies of those loans from certain specified sources; and to repeal acts and parts of acts,” (MCL 247.651 to 247.675) by amending the title, as amended by 2010 PA 135, and by adding section 18.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Rep. Outman introduced

House Bill No. 5543, entitled

A bill to amend 2001 PA 142, entitled “Michigan memorial highway act,” (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2080) by adding section 81.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Reps. Lipton and Callton introduced

House Bill No. 5544, entitled

A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled “The revised school code,” by amending section 1278 (MCL 380.1278), as amended by 2004 PA 596, and by adding section 1168.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Education.

Reps. Leonard, Haveman, Tlaib, Oakes, Santana, Schor and Howrylak introduced

House Bill No. 5545, entitled

A bill to amend 1965 PA 213, entitled “An act to provide for setting aside the conviction in certain criminal cases; to provide for the effect of such action; to provide for the retention of certain nonpublic records and their use; to prescribe the powers and duties of certain public agencies and officers; and to prescribe penalties,” by amending sections 1, 3, and 4 (MCL 780.621, 780.623, and 780.624), section 1 as amended by 2011 PA 64, section 3 as amended by 1994 PA 294, and section 4 as added by 1982 PA 495.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Rep. Knezek introduced

House Bill No. 5546, entitled

A bill to amend 1949 PA 300, entitled “Michigan vehicle code,” by amending section 310 (MCL 257.310), as amended by 2013 PA 27.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

______

Rep. Olumba moved that the House adjourn.

The motion prevailed, the time being 6:15 p.m.

Associate Speaker Pro Tempore Cotter declared the House adjourned until Wednesday, May 7, at 1:30 p.m.

GARY L. RANDALL

Clerk of the House of Representatives

660 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 661

662 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 663

664 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 665

666 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 667

668 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 669

670 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 671

672 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 673

674 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 675

676 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 677

678 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 679

680 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 681

682 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 683

684 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 685

686 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 687

688 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 689

690 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 691

692 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 693

694 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 695

696 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 697

698 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 699

700 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 701

702 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 703

704 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [May 6, 2014] [No. 41

No. 41] [May 6, 2014] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 705

706