PAROLE ABSCONDERS: PUBLIC ASSISTANCE S.B. 18 & 19:
SUMMARY OF BILL
REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE
Senate Bills 18 and 19 (as reported without amendment)
Sponsor: Senator Ken Horn (S.B. 18)
Senator Dale W. Zorn (S.B. 19)
Committee: Michigan Competitiveness
CONTENT
Senate Bill 18 would amend the Corrections Code to require each field operations administration region of the Department of Corrections (DOC), on a quarterly basis, to give the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) a list of supervised individuals within the region who had absconded from supervision and whom a law enforcement agency was actively seeking.
"Supervised individual" would mean a person who has been released from prison on parole. "Abscond" would mean the intentional failure of an individual supervised under the Corrections Code to report to his or her supervising agent and to advise the agent of his or her whereabouts.
Senate Bill 19 would amend the Social Welfare Act to do the following:
-- Prohibit the DHHS from granting cash assistance to parole absconders.
-- Prohibit the DHHS from granting food assistance to parole absconders who were being actively sought by law enforcement.
-- Require the DHHS Director or his or her designee to review information provided by a field operations administration region to determine if cash assistance recipients or applicants had absconded from parole, or if food assistance recipients or applicants had absconded from parole and were being actively sought.
-- Prohibit the DHHS from granting food assistance to an individual who had an outstanding felony warrant and was being actively sought by law enforcement.
Proposed MCL 791.284 (S.B. 18) Legislative Analyst: Suzanne Lowe
MCL 400.10b (S.B. 19)
FISCAL IMPACT
Senate Bill 18 would have no fiscal impact on State or local government. The additional required report would be completed using the Department of Corrections' existing appropriations.
Senate Bill 19 could result in maximum annual savings to the State of approximately $8.3 million in Gross expenditures and $4.2 million in General Fund/General Purpose expenditures, based on the average of expenditures for 2014, 2015, and 2016. (The numbers for 2016 in this analysis are annualized based on data through March 2016.) The bill would have no fiscal impact on local government.
From information provided by the Michigan Department of Corrections, the figures for parole absconders for the past three years are as follows: 1,635 in 2014; 1,383 in 2015; and 1,211 in 2016.
Funding for the public assistance programs covered under the bill is provided by Federal and State revenue sources. Therefore, if benefits were severed for both federally and State-funded programs, there would be Gross expenditure savings; however, the only General Fund/General Purpose savings would be due to a reduction in the caseloads of State-funded programs.
Although Senate Bill 18 would require the Michigan Department of Corrections to provide a quarterly list of parole absconders to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to determine the number of absconders who were receiving public assistance, it is not currently known how many parole absconders are presently receiving public assistance. For purposes of determining the maximum fiscal savings under Senate Bill 19, this analysis assumes that the entire population of parole absconders is receiving public assistance benefits for an entire fiscal year.
For the programs that are federally funded, the Federal portion of the Family Independence Program and the Food Assistance Program, assuming all of the parole absconders were receiving the average public assistance benefit amounts, the savings if these individuals had been severed from benefits in the prior three years would be as follows: $4,683,164 in 2014; $3,869,584 in 2015; and $3,382,329 in 2016; for a total of $11,935,077.
For the programs that are State-funded, the State portion of the Family Independence Program and the State Disability Assistance program, if all of the parole absconders were receiving the average public assistance benefit amounts, the savings if these individuals had been severed from benefits in the prior three years would be as follows: $4,896,092 in 2014; $4,086,787 in 2015; and $3,852,430 in 2016; for a total of $12,835,309.
This analysis assumes the maximum possible savings if all of the parole absconders were indeed receiving public assistance benefits for an entire fiscal year. This may or may not be the case as the number of parole absconders who are receiving public assistance benefits is not currently known. The number of absconders who are actually receiving benefits could range from the entire known universe of absconders to a very small number of absconders. As a result, there would be uncertainty in the total savings until quarterly reports were delivered by the DOC to the DHHS as required by Senate Bill 18.
Date Completed: 1-27-17 Fiscal Analyst: Ryan Bergan
John Maxwell
This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.