BEER & WINE: REFUND & REPLACEMENT                                                   S.B. 357 (S-2):

                                                                                                    SUMMARY OF BILL

                                                                                                  ON THIRD READING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senate Bill 357 (Substitute S-2 as reported by the Committee of the Whole)

Sponsor:  Senator Rebekah Warren

Committee:  Regulatory Reform

 


CONTENT

 

The bill would amend the Michigan Liquor Control Code to allow a manufacturer that sold direct to a retailer as provided under Section 203(19) (which allows a qualified micro brewer, or a substantially equivalent out-of-State entity, to sell and deliver beer to a retailer in the State if certain conditions are met) or a wholesaler to refund to a retailer the amount the retailer paid for beer or wine, as applicable, or allow such a manufacturer or a wholesaler to replace that beer or wine for any of the following reasons:

 

 --    The beer or wine was outdated.

 --    The beer or wine was defective.

 --    There was an error in the beer or wine delivered.

 --    The beer or wine could no longer be lawfully sold.

 --    The retailer's business terminated.

 --    The formula, proof, label, or container of the beer or wine was changed.

 --    The beer or wine was discontinued.

 --    The retailer was open only a portion of the year and the beer or wine was likely to spoil during the off-season.

 

If the beer were within 30 days of its out-of-date code, a manufacturer that sold direct to a retailer or a wholesaler could refund to a retailer the amount it paid for the beer.

 

A manufacturer that sold direct to a retailer or a wholesaler could issue a refund or replacement under these provisions only for beer or wine that the manufacturer or wholesaler sold to the retailer.

 

Proposed MCL 436.1609c                                           Legislative Analyst:  Drew Krogulecki

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The bill would have no fiscal impact on State or local government.

 

Date Completed:  6-15-17                                                     Fiscal Analyst:  Josh Sefton

 

 

 

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.