HOUSE BILL No. 4964

 

 

September 14, 2017, Introduced by Rep. Glenn and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

 

     A bill to provide remedies related to defamation judgments

 

entered in foreign countries.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "free

 

speech defense act".

 

     Sec. 2. As used in this act:

 

     (a) "Foreign country" means that term as defined in section 2

 

of the uniform foreign-country money judgments act, 2008 PA 20, MCL

 

691.1132.

 

     (b) "Foreign defamation action" means a legal proceeding

 

instituted in a court of a foreign country that asserted a cause of

 

action arising from allegations of defamation, libel, or slander.

 

     (c) Foreign defamation judgment" means a judgment rendered in

 

a court in a foreign country that was entered in a foreign

 


defamation action.

 

     Sec. 3. (1) A foreign defamation judgment is not conclusive if

 

any of the following apply:

 

     (a) The judgment was rendered under a system that does not

 

provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the

 

requirements of due process of law.

 

     (b) The foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over

 

the defendant.

 

     (c) The foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the

 

subject matter.

 

     (2) A court of this state shall not recognize, grant comity

 

to, treat as res judicata, or use as the basis for collateral

 

estoppel a foreign defamation judgment if any of the following

 

apply:

 

     (a) The defendant in the proceedings in the foreign court did

 

not receive notice of the proceedings in sufficient time to enable

 

the defendant to provide a defense.

 

     (b) The judgment was obtained by fraud.

 

     (c) The cause of action or claim for relief on which the

 

judgment is based is repugnant to the public policy of this state.

 

     (d) The judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive

 

order.

 

     (e) The proceeding in the foreign court was contrary to an

 

agreement between the parties under which the dispute in question

 

was to be settled otherwise than by proceedings in that court.

 

     (f) If jurisdiction was based only on personal service, the

 

foreign court was an inconvenient forum for the trial of the


action.

 

     (g) The foreign country where judgment was rendered would not

 

give recognition to a similar judgment rendered in this state.

 

     (h) The court sitting in this state before which the matter is

 

brought determines that the defamation law applied in the foreign

 

defamation action by the foreign court failed to provide at least

 

as much protection for freedom of speech and press as would be

 

provided by the constitutions of this state and the United States.

 

     Sec. 4. (1) A person against whom a foreign defamation

 

judgment is entered, whether the foreign defamation judgment is

 

final or appealable, may bring an action in the circuit court for a

 

declaratory judgment with respect to the liability of the person

 

for the judgment and determining whether the judgment is

 

unenforceable for any reason enumerated in section 3(2).

 

     (2) For purposes of rendering declaratory relief under this

 

act, the courts of this state have personal jurisdiction over a

 

person who obtains a foreign defamation judgment against any of the

 

following:

 

     (a) A resident of this state.

 

     (b) A person or entity amenable to the jurisdiction of this

 

state.

 

     (c) A person who has assets in this state.

 

     (d) A person who may have to take action in this state to

 

comply with the judgment.

 

     Sec. 5. (1) A person against whom a foreign defamation action

 

has been instituted may bring an action for an injunction if the

 

foreign defamation action would do any of the following:


     (a) Frustrate a policy of this state, the guarantee of due

 

process, or the protection of freedom of speech.

 

     (b) Be vexatious or oppressive.

 

     (c) Prejudice other equitable considerations.

 

     (2) For purposes of rendering injunctive relief under this

 

act, the courts of this state have personal jurisdiction over a

 

person who institutes a foreign defamation action against any of

 

the following:

 

     (a) A resident of this state.

 

     (b) A person or entity amenable to the jurisdiction of this

 

state.

 

     (c) A person who has assets in this state.

 

     (d) A person why may have to take action in this state to

 

comply with the judgment.

 

     Sec. 6. The existence of a previously filed foreign defamation

 

action is not an affirmative defense to an action for declaratory

 

or injunctive relief under this act.

 

     Sec. 7. An action for declaratory or injunctive relief under

 

this act may be brought in any of the following:

 

     (a) The county in which the plaintiff resides.

 

     (b) A county in which the plaintiff has assets.

 

     (c) Any other county in which venue is proper under other

 

applicable law of this state.

 

     Enacting section 1. This act takes effect 90 days after the

 

date it is enacted into law.

 

     Enacting section 2. This act does not take effect unless

 

Senate Bill No. ___ or House Bill No. 4967 (request no. 03883'17 a)


of the 99th Legislature is enacted into law.