SENATE BILL No. 830

 

 

February 20, 2018, Introduced by Senator HUNE and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

 

 

     A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled

 

"The insurance code of 1956,"

 

by amending section 1239 (MCL 500.1239), as amended by 2008 PA 423.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 1239. (1) In addition to any other powers under this act,

 

the commissioner director may place on probation, suspend, or

 

revoke an insurance producer's license or may levy a civil fine

 

under section 1244 or any combination of actions, and the

 

commissioner director shall refuse to not issue a license under

 

section 1205 or 1206a, for any 1 or more of the following causes:

 

     (a) Providing incorrect, misleading, incomplete, or materially

 

untrue information in the license application. However, if the

 

insured signs a disclosure that accurately summarizes the

 

transaction with the insurance producer for any insurance or

 


noninsurance product, there is a rebuttable presumption that the

 

insurance producer did not engage in the cause described in this

 

subdivision.

 

     (b) Violating any insurance laws or violating any regulation,

 

subpoena, or order of the commissioner director or of another

 

state's insurance commissioner. However, if the insured signs a

 

disclosure that accurately summarizes the transaction with the

 

insurance producer for any insurance or noninsurance product, there

 

is a rebuttable presumption that the insurance producer did not

 

engage in the cause described in this subdivision.

 

     (c) Obtaining or attempting to obtain a license through

 

misrepresentation or fraud.

 

     (d) Improperly withholding, misappropriating, or converting

 

any money or property received in the course of doing insurance

 

business. However, if the insured signs a disclosure that

 

accurately summarizes the transaction with the insurance producer

 

for any insurance or noninsurance product, there is a rebuttable

 

presumption that the insurance producer did not engage in the cause

 

described in this subdivision.

 

     (e) Intentionally misrepresenting the terms of an actual or

 

proposed insurance contract or application for insurance. However,

 

if the insured signs a disclosure that accurately summarizes the

 

transaction with the insurance producer for any insurance or

 

noninsurance product, there is a rebuttable presumption that the

 

insurance producer did not engage in the cause described in this

 

subdivision.

 

     (f) Having been convicted of a felony.


     (g) Having admitted or been found to have committed any

 

insurance unfair trade practice or fraud.

 

     (h) Using fraudulent, coercive, or dishonest practices or

 

demonstrating incompetence, untrustworthiness, or financial

 

irresponsibility in the conduct of business in this state or

 

elsewhere. However, if the insured signs a disclosure that

 

accurately summarizes the transaction with the insurance producer

 

for any insurance or noninsurance product, there is a rebuttable

 

presumption that the insurance producer did not engage in the cause

 

described in this subdivision.

 

     (i) Having an insurance producer license or its equivalent

 

denied, suspended, or revoked in any other state, province,

 

district, or territory.

 

     (j) Forging another's name to an application for insurance or

 

to any document related to an insurance transaction.

 

     (k) Improperly using notes or any other reference material to

 

complete an examination for an insurance license.

 

     (l) Knowingly accepting insurance business from an individual

 

who is not licensed.

 

     (m) Failing to comply with an administrative or court order

 

imposing a child support obligation.

 

     (n) Failing to pay the single business tax or the Michigan

 

business tax or comply with any administrative or court order

 

directing payment of the single business tax or the Michigan

 

business tax.

 

     (2) Before the commissioner director denies an application for

 

a license under section 1205 or 1206a, the commissioner director


shall notify in writing the applicant or licensee of the denial and

 

of the reason for the denial. Not later than 30 days after this

 

written denial, the applicant or licensee may make written demand

 

upon on the commissioner director for a hearing before the

 

commissioner director to determine the reasonableness of the

 

commissioner's director's action. A hearing under this subsection

 

shall must be held pursuant to under the administrative procedures

 

act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328.

 

     (3) The director may suspend, revoke, or refuse to issue the

 

license of a business entity may be suspended, revoked, or refused

 

if the commissioner director finds, after hearing, that an

 

individual licensee's violation was known or should have been known

 

by 1 or more of the partners, officers, or managers acting on

 

behalf of the partnership or corporation and the violation was

 

neither not reported to the commissioner nor director and

 

corrective action was not taken.

 

     (4) In addition to or in lieu instead of any applicable

 

denial, suspension, or revocation of a license, a person may, after

 

hearing, be subject to a civil fine under section 1244.

 

     (5) In addition to the penalties under this section, the

 

commissioner director may enforce the provisions of and impose any

 

penalty or remedy authorized by this act against any a person who

 

that is under investigation for or charged with a violation of this

 

act even if the person's license or registration has been

 

surrendered or has lapsed by operation of law.