STATE OF MICHIGAN
JOURNAL
OF THE
House of Representatives
100th
Legislature
REGULAR SESSION OF
2020
House Chamber, Lansing, Tuesday, June 2, 2020.
1:30 p.m.
The House was called to order by the Clerk.
The roll was called by the Clerk of the House
of Representatives, who announced that a quorum was not present.
Motions and Resolutions
Reps. Cole, Wentworth, Maddock, Green, LaFave,
VanSingel, Hoitenga, Lower, Markkanen, Meerman, O’Malley, Eisen, Lightner,
Steven Johnson, Howell and Love offered the following resolution:
House
Resolution No. 269.
A
resolution to oppose the Natural Resources Commission’s proposed policy change
requiring orange coloring on each side of a hunting ground blind.
Whereas,
The state of Michigan has a long tradition of hunting. Hunting is the preferred
means of managing wildlife through sportsmen and women’s responsible use of
wildlife resources in this state. Hunting has a significant and positive
economic impact on this state; and
Whereas,
Individuals are required to wear hunter orange when hunting during daylight
hours from August 15 through April 30 with only a few exceptions. In
effect for over 40 years, the law is meant to make hunters more visible to each
other while in the fields and woods of Michigan; and
Whereas,
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) recently recommended to the Natural
Resources Commission that hunters be required to display at least 144 square
inches of hunter orange on ground blinds. The recommendation affects blinds
located on both public and private lands during a deer season in which wearing
of hunter orange is required. The department claims that this requirement will
reduce hunting accidents; and
Whereas,
According to the DNR, overall fatalities and injuries occurring during firearm
deer season have been trending downward for over 30 years. In the past three
firearm seasons, 2017 to 2019, there have been a total of 14 incidents in which
individuals have either shot themselves or another person. Of these 14 incidents,
only one involved a hunter in a blind and that individual accidentally shot
himself. Hunter orange on the outside of the blind would not have prevented
this incident; and
Whereas,
Requiring hunters to post hunter orange on ground blinds would simply be a
burden on hunters with little relevance to the proposed policy’s supposed
purpose of reducing hunting accidents; and
Whereas,
This proposal is a big government solution to a problem that does not exist and
could create new concerns including violating the rights of private property
owners and increasing the theft of pop-up and other portable blinds used on
public lands; now, therefore, be it
Resolved
by the House of Representatives, That we oppose the Natural Resources
Commission’s proposed policy change requiring orange coloring on each side of a
hunting ground blind; and be it further
Resolved,
That copies of this resolution be transmitted to the members of the Michigan
Natural Resources Commission, the Director of the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources, and the Governor of Michigan.
The resolution was referred to the Committee on Natural
Resources and Outdoor Recreation.
Announcement by the Clerk of Printing and
Enrollment
The Clerk announced that the following bills had been
reproduced and made available electronically on Thursday, May 28:
House Bill Nos. 5811 5812 5813 5814 5815 5816 5817 5818 5819 5820 5821 5822 5823
The Clerk announced that the following bills had been
reproduced and made available electronically on Tuesday, June 2:
Senate Bill Nos. 946 947 948 949 950
The Clerk announced that the following Senate bills had
been received on Tuesday, June 2:
Senate Bill Nos. 417 418 843 844
Reports of Standing Committees
The
Committee on Local Government and Municipal Finance, by Rep. Lower, Chair, referred
House
Bill No. 5260, entitled
A bill
to amend 1945 PA 200, entitled “An act to define a marketable record title to
an interest in land; to require the filing of notices of claim of interest in
such land in certain cases within a definite period of time and to require the
recording thereof; to make invalid and of no force or effect all claims with
respect to the land affected thereby where no such notices of claim of interest
are filed within the required period; to provide for certain penalties for
filing slanderous notices of claim of interest, and to provide certain
exceptions to the applicability and operation thereof,” by amending section 4
(MCL 565.104), as amended by 2018 PA 572.
to the
Committee on Ways and Means.
Favorable Roll
Call
To Refer:
Yeas:
Reps. Lower, Marino, Crawford, Calley, Howell, Eisen, Markkanen, Paquette,
Ellison, Sowerby, Garza, Hope and Kuppa
Nays:
None
The
bill was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The
Committee on Local Government and Municipal Finance, by Rep. Lower, Chair,
referred
House
Bill No. 5611, entitled
A bill
to amend 1945 PA 200, entitled “An act to define a marketable record title to
an interest in land; to require the filing of notices of claim of interest in
such land in certain cases within a definite period of time and to require the
recording thereof; to make invalid and of no force or effect all claims with
respect to the land affected thereby where no such notices of claim of interest
are filed within the required period; to provide for certain penalties for
filing slanderous notices of claim of interest, and to provide certain
exceptions to the applicability and operation thereof,” by amending section 3
(MCL 565.103), as amended by 2018 PA 572.
to the
Committee on Ways and Means.
Favorable Roll
Call
To
Refer:
Yeas:
Reps. Lower, Marino, Crawford, Calley, Howell, Eisen, Markkanen, Paquette,
Ellison, Sowerby, Garza, Hope and Kuppa
Nays:
None
The
bill was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
COMMITTEE
ATTENDANCE REPORT
The
following report, submitted by Rep. Lower, Chair, of the Committee on Local
Government and Municipal Finance, was received and read:
Meeting
held on: Thursday, May 28, 2020
Present:
Reps. Lower, Marino, Crawford, Calley, Howell, Eisen, Markkanen, Paquette,
Ellison, Sowerby, Garza, Hope and Kuppa
The
Committee on Communications and Technology, by Rep. Hoitenga, Chair, referred
House
Bill No. 5602, entitled
A bill
to amend 1972 PA 230, entitled “Stille-DeRossett-Hale single state construction
code act,” by amending section 28a (MCL 125.1528a), as amended by 2018 PA 332.
to the
Committee on Ways and Means.
Favorable Roll
Call
To
Refer:
Yeas:
Reps. Hoitenga, Steven Johnson, Wozniak and Coleman
Nays:
None
The
bill was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
COMMITTEE
ATTENDANCE REPORT
The
following report, submitted by Rep. Hoitenga, Chair, of the Committee on
Communications and Technology, was received and read:
Meeting
held on: Thursday, May 28, 2020
Present:
Reps. Hoitenga, Steven Johnson, Wozniak and Coleman
Absent:
Rep. Chirkun
Excused:
Rep. Chirkun
The
Committee on Health Policy, by Rep. Vaupel, Chair, referred
Senate
Bill No. 630, entitled
A bill
to amend 1978 PA 368, entitled “Public health code,” by amending sections
16111, 16333, 17705, 17706, 17707, 17709, 17722, 17742, 17748, 17767, and 17768
(MCL 333.16111, 333.16333, 333.17705, 333.17706, 333.17707, 333.17709,
333.17722, 333.17742, 333.17748, 333.17767, and 333.17768), section 16111
as amended by 2006 PA 392, section 16333 as amended by 2014 PA 285, section
17705 as amended by 1986 PA 304, section 17706 as amended by 2014 PA 280,
sections 17707, 17709, 17722, 17742, 17748, and 17768 as amended by 2020 PA 4,
and section 17767 as amended by 1993 PA 79, and by adding sections 17748e and
17748f.
to the
Committee on Ways and Means.
Favorable Roll
Call
To
Refer:
Yeas:
Reps. Vaupel, Frederick, Calley, Hornberger, Whiteford, Afendoulis, Filler,
Mueller, Wozniak, Liberati, Ellison, Koleszar, Pohutsky, Stone and Witwer
Nays:
None
The
bill was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
COMMITTEE
ATTENDANCE REPORT
The
following report, submitted by Rep. Vaupel, Chair, of the Committee on Health
Policy, was received and read:
Meeting
held on: Tuesday, June 2, 2020
Present:
Reps. Vaupel, Frederick, Calley, Hornberger, Whiteford, Afendoulis, Filler,
Mueller, Wozniak, Liberati, Ellison, Koleszar, Pohutsky, Stone and Witwer
Absent:
Reps. Alexander, Lower, Garrett and Clemente
Excused:
Reps. Alexander, Lower, Garrett and Clemente
Messages from the Senate
A bill to amend 1978 PA 368,
entitled “Public health code,” by amending sections 17744a and 17744d (MCL
333.17744a and 333.17744d), section 17744a as amended and section 17744d as
added by 2015 PA 221.
The Senate has passed the bill.
The bill was read a first time by
its title and referred to the Committee on Health Policy.
A bill
to allow certain law enforcement officers and firefighters to administer
auto-injectable epinephrine in certain circumstances; to provide access to
auto-injectable epinephrine by eligible entities, law enforcement officers, and
firefighters; and to limit civil and criminal liability of certain entities and
individuals.
The
Senate has passed the bill.
The
bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Health
Policy.
A bill
to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled “The revised school code,” by amending section
1178 (MCL 380.1178), as amended by 2019 PA 38.
The
Senate has passed the bill.
The
bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Health
Policy.
A bill
to amend 2019 PA 39, entitled “Administration of opioid antagonists act,” by
amending section 107 (MCL 15.677).
The
Senate has passed the bill.
The
bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Health
Policy.
Messages from the Governor
The following message from the Governor
was received May 28, 2020 and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-106
Establishing
deadline to redeem property for
nonpayment
of delinquent property taxes
Rescission
of Executive Order 2020-14
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
is a respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is
caused by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and
easily spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department
of Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive
cases of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order
2020-4. This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan
under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency
Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq., and the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945 PA 302, as amended (EPGA),
MCL 10.31 et seq.
Since then, the virus spread
across Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens
of thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and
educational, civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in
response to the widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed
by the COVID-19 pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded
on Executive Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of
disaster across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the
Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency
Powers of the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that
COVID-19 had created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of
Michigan, I issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency
declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as
Executive Order 2020-68 to issue new emergency and disaster declarations under
the Emergency Management Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of Representatives and Michigan Senate v
Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order
2020-67 is a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act but that Executive Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely
to be appealed.
On May 22, 2020, I issued
Executive Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a
disaster and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted
a state of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act
of 1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an
extension request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state
of disaster declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive
order. In relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of
emergency, “the governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and
regulations as he or she considers necessary to protect life and property or to
bring the emergency situation within the affected area under control.” MCL
10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the
ongoing litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned
or otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke Emergency Management Act as a
basis for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the
effects of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to
preserve the rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the
governor with broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or
the people of this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the
governor may implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives
having the force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order
falls within the scope of those powers and duties, and to the extent the
governor may declare a state of emergency and a state of disaster under the
Emergency Management Act when emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the
legislature has not granted an extension request, they too provide a sufficient
legal basis for this order.
The home provides a key piece of
protection against the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to avoid losing their homes,
homeowners whose residences are subject to tax forfeiture must make redemption
payments with the county treasurer. Yet requiring county treasury employees to
report to work in person would increase the risks of COVID-19 transmission. In
order to limit in-person work and physical interactions, it is therefore
reasonable and necessary to temporarily suspend rules and procedures to extend
the deadline for redemption of property foreclosed for nonpayment of delinquent
property taxes.
Executive Order 2020-14 provided
this relief by extending the tax foreclosure redemption deadline to May 29,
2020. Because the risk of COVID-19 transmission via in-person work persists, it
has become reasonable and necessary to further extend this deadline.
With this order, Executive Order
2020-14 is rescinded.
Acting under the Michigan
Constitution of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. The deadline by which property forfeited to a
county treasurer may be redeemed is extended from March 31, 2020 to June 29,
2020. This extended deadline does not apply to property already subject to a
court order providing a deadline later than June 30, 2020.
2. A copy of this order will be transmitted to
the State Court Administrative Office. The State Court Administrative Office is
encouraged to urge judges of the circuit courts to amend orders of foreclosure
issued in 2020 under subsection 5 of section 78k of the General Property Tax
Act, MCL 211.78k(5), in a manner consistent with this order. Strict compliance
with section 78k is temporarily suspended to the extent necessary to permit
circuit courts to amend orders of foreclosure consistent with this order.
3. Executive Order 2020-14 is rescinded.
4. This order is effective immediately upon
issuance.
Given under my hand and the Great
Seal of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 28, 2020
Time: 8:11 pm
[SEAL] GRETCHEN
WHITMER
GOVERNOR
By
the Governor:
JOCELYN
BENSON
SECRETARY
OF STATE
The message was referred to the
Clerk.
The following message from the Governor
was received May 29, 2020 and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-107
Department
of Labor and Economic Opportunity
Michigan
Workforce Development Board
Rescission
of Executive Order 2015-11
To ensure Michigan workers can
acquire the skills and credentials they need to secure and advance in jobs with
family-sustaining wages, and to ensure Michigan’s job providers have access to
the skilled workers they need to succeed in a global economy, Michigan must
strengthen the quality and labor market relevance of its workforce through
investment, education, and economic development efforts. Achieving this
requires the alignment of these efforts to support a comprehensive, accessible,
and high-quality workforce development system.
Section 101 of chapter 1 of the
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, Public Law 113-128, as amended, 29
USC 3101 to 3361 (the “WIOA”), requires the governor to establish a state
workforce development board. 29 USC 3111(a).
Executive Order 2015-11
established the former Governor’s Talent Investment Board within the Michigan
Talent Investment Agency as Michigan’s workforce development board. That order
was amended by Executive Order 2018-13, which renamed the board the Michigan
Future Talent Council, transferred the Council to the Department of Talent and
Economic Development, and altered the Council’s membership and
responsibilities. Under Executive Reorganization Order 2019-3, the Department
of Talent and Economic Development was renamed the Department of Labor and
Economic Opportunity.
Changes in the structure and
operation of Michigan’s workforce development board are necessary to reflect
the current organizational structure of the state government, to comply with
federal law, and to better address the employment and skill needs of Michigan’s
workers and job providers. The United States Department of Labor has approved
the composition of Michigan’s workforce development board as described in this
order.
Section 1 of article 5 of the
Michigan Constitution of 1963 vests the executive power of the State of
Michigan in the governor.
Section 8 of article 5 of the
Michigan Constitution of 1963 obligates the governor to take care that the laws
be faithfully executed.
Acting under the Michigan
Constitution of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. Creating
the Michigan Workforce Development Board
(a) The Michigan Workforce Development Board (the “Board”)
is created as an advisory body within the Department of Labor and Economic
Opportunity (the “Department”), and is designated as the state workforce
development board required by section 101 of the WIOA, 29 USC 3111, and
includes the following members:
(1) The governor, or the governor’s designee.
(2) One member of the Michigan House of
Representatives, appointed by the governor from a list of three candidates
submitted by the speaker.
(3) One member of the Michigan Senate, appointed
by the governor from a list of three candidates submitted by the majority
leader.
(4) The director of the Department, or the
director’s designee from within that Department.
(5) The following members appointed by the
governor:
(A) Twelve residents of this state representing
businesses in Michigan. Each member must be an owner of a business, a chief
executive or operating officer of a business, or other business executive or
employer with optimum policy-making or hiring authority. These members must
include:
(i) A small business owner.
(ii) A member representing manufacturing business
enterprises.
(iii) A member representing mobility business enterprises.
(iv) A member representing minority-owned business
enterprises.
(v) A member representing female-owned business
enterprises.
(vi) A member representing business enterprises
employing veterans, returning citizens, or persons with disabilities.
(vii) A member representing business who is also a
member of the Michigan Economic Development Corporation Board.
(viii) Five
other members.
(B) Three residents of this state representing the
workforce and general labor in Michigan.
(C) Five other residents of this state, including
all of the following:
(i) A director of a Michigan high school career
and technical education program, including high school instructional programs
that teach students skills in a specific career clusters and prepare students
so they have the necessary academic, technical, and work behavior skills to
enter, compete, and advance in education and in their careers.
(ii) An apprenticeship coordinator of a joint
labor-management apprenticeship program.
(iii) One chief elected official of a city or county
in this state, or the chief elected official’s designee.
(iv) One president of a community college district
organized under the Community College Act of 1966, 1966 PA 331, as amended, MCL
389.1 to 389.195.
(v) One president of an institution of higher
education described in or established pursuant to section 5 or 6 of article 8
of the Michigan Constitution of 1963.
(6) One non-voting member of the Michigan House of
Representatives, appointed by the governor from a list of three candidates
submitted by the house minority leader.
(7) One non-voting member of the Michigan Senate,
appointed by the governor from a list of three candidates submitted by the
senate minority leader.
(b) The members of the Board appointed under
section 1(a)(5) of this order must represent diverse geographic areas of this
state, including urban, rural, and suburban areas.
(c) No member of the Board may serve as a member representing
more than one of the following:
(1) The category described in section 1(a)(5)(A)
of this order.
(2) The category described in section 1(a)(5)(B)
of this order.
(3) The category described in section 1(a)(5)(C)
of this order.
(d) At least one of the members appointed under
section 1(a)(5)(A) of this order must represent a small business as defined by
the United States Small Business Administration.
(e) To encourage coordination and cooperation
between the Board and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, and the
more effective alignment of workforce and economic development efforts in this
state, at least one of the Board members appointed under section 1(a)(5)(A)
of this order must also be a member of the executive committee of the Michigan
Economic Development Corporation.
(f) A member representing an organization
described in section 1(a)(5)(B) or 1(a)(5)(C) of this order must be an
individual with optimum policy-making authority in the organization or for the
core program that they represent. For purposes of this section 1, an individual
with optimum policy-making authority is an individual who can reasonably be
expected to speak affirmatively on behalf of the entity he or she represents
and to commit that entity to a chosen course of action.
(g) The Board members initially appointed under
section 1(a)(2) and 1(a)(6) of this order must be appointed for a term expiring
on January 1, 2021. After the initial appointment, the Board members appointed
under section 1(a)(2) and 1(a)(6) of this order must be appointed for a term of
two years, concurrent with the two-year term for a member of the Michigan House
of Representatives. The Board member initially appointed under section 1(a)(3)
and 1(a)(7) of this order must be appointed for a term expiring on January 1,
2023. After the initial appointment, the Board member appointed under section
1(a)(3) and 1(a)(7) of this order must be appointed for a term of four years,
concurrent with the four-year term for a member of the Michigan Senate.
(h) Of the Board members appointed under section
1(a)(5) of this order, five members must be appointed for a term of four years,
five members must be appointed for a term of three years, five members must be
appointed for a term of two years, and five members must be appointed for a
term of one year. After the initial appointments, a member of the Board
appointed under section 1(a)(5) of this order must be appointed for a term of
four years.
(i) The director of the Department must notify
the governor of a vacancy on the Board. A vacancy on the Board created other
than by the expiration of the term of a member of the Board will be filled in
the same manner as the original appointment, for the remainder of the unexpired
term. A member of the Board may be reappointed for additional terms.
(j) The governor must designate a member of the
Board appointed under section 1(a)(5)(A) of this order to serve as chairperson
of the Board at the pleasure of the governor. The Board must elect a vice-chairperson
from among its members. The vice-chairperson must act as chairperson when the
chairperson of the Board is absent.
2. Charge
to the Board
(a) The Board is an advisory body and must assist
the governor with all of the following:
(1) The development, implementation, and
modification of Michigan’s four-year unified state plan pursuant to the WIOA,
29 USC 3112.
(2) Consistent with section 2(a)(1) of this order,
the review of statewide policies, of statewide programs, and of recommendations
on actions that should be taken by this state to align workforce development
programs in Michigan in a manner that supports a comprehensive and streamlined
workforce development system in Michigan, including the review and provision of
comments on the state plans, if any, for programs and activities of one-stop
partners that are not core programs.
(3) The development and continuous improvement of
the workforce development system in Michigan, including all of the following:
(A) The identification of barriers and means for
removing barriers to better coordinate, align, and avoid duplication among the
programs and activities carried out through the system.
(B) The development of strategies to support the
use of career pathways for the purpose of providing individuals, including
low-skilled adults, youth, and individuals with barriers to employment
(including individuals with disabilities), with workforce investment
activities, education, and supportive services to enter or retain employment.
(C) The
development of strategies for providing effective outreach to and improved
access for individuals and employers who could benefit from services provided
through the workforce development system.
(D) The development and expansion of strategies for
meeting the needs of employers, workers, and jobseekers, particularly through
industry or sector partnerships related to in-demand industry sectors and
occupations.
(E) The identification of regions, including
planning regions, for the purposes of section 106(a) of the WIOA, 29 USC
3121(a), and the designation of local areas under section 106 of the WIOA, 29
US 3121, after consultation with local boards and chief elected officials.
(F) The development and continuous improvement of
the one-stop delivery system in local areas, including providing assistance to
local boards, one-stop operators, one-stop partners, and providers with
planning and delivering services, including training services and supportive
services, to support effective delivery of services to workers, jobseekers, and
employers.
(G) The development of strategies to support staff
training and awareness across programs supported under the workforce
development system.
(4) The development and updating of comprehensive
performance accountability measures for this state, including state-adjusted
levels of performance, to assess the effectiveness of the core programs in
Michigan, as required under section 116(b) of the WIOA, 29 USC 3141(b).
(5) The identification and dissemination of information
of best practices, including best practices for all of the following:
(A) The effective operation of one-stop centers,
relating to the use of business outreach, partnerships, and service delivery
strategies, including strategies for serving individuals with barriers to
employment.
(B) The development of effective local boards,
which may include information on factors that contribute to enabling local
boards to exceed negotiated local levels of performance, sustain fiscal
integrity, and achieve other measures of effectiveness.
(C) Effective training programs that respond to
real-time labor market analysis that effectively use direct assessment and
prior learning assessment to measure an individual’s prior knowledge, skills,
competencies, and experiences, and that evaluate the skills and competencies
for adaptability to support efficient placement into employment or career
pathways.
(6) The development and review of statewide
policies affecting the coordinated provision of services through this state’s
one-stop delivery system described in section 121(e) of the WIOA, 29 USC
3151(e), including the development of all of the following:
(A) Objective criteria and procedures for use by
local boards in assessing the effectiveness and continuous improvement of
one-stop centers described in 121(g) of the WIOA, 29 USC 3151(g);
(B) Guidance for the allocation of one-stop center
infrastructure funds under section 121(h) of the WIOA, 29 USC 3151(h).
(C) Policies
relating to the appropriate roles and contributions of entities carrying out
one-stop partner programs within the one-stop delivery system, including
approaches to facilitating equitable and efficient cost allocation in the
system.
(7) The development of strategies for technological
improvements to facilitate access to, and improve the quality of, services and
activities provided through the one-stop delivery system, including the
improvements to do all of the following:
(A) Enhance digital literacy skills as defined in
section 202 of the Museum and Library Service Act, Public Law 94-462, as
amended, 20 USC 9101.
(B) Accelerate the acquisition of skills and
recognized postsecondary credentials by participants.
(C) Strengthen the professional development of providers
and workforce professionals.
(D) Ensure technology is accessible to individuals
with disabilities and individuals residing in remote areas.
(8) The development of strategies for aligning
technology and data systems across one-stop partner programs to enhance service
delivery and improve efficiencies in reporting on performance accountability
measures, including the design and implementation of common intake, data
collection, case management information, and performance accountability measurement
and reporting processes and the incorporation of local input into such design
and implementation, to improve coordination of services across one-stop partner
programs.
(9) The development of allocation formulas for the
distribution of money for employment and training activities for adults, and
for youth workforce investment activities, to local areas as permitted under
sections 128(b)(3) and 133(b)(3) of the WIOA, 29 USC 3163(b)(3) and 29 USC
3173(b)(3).
(10) The development of strategies to ensure
engagement of stakeholders from the state’s vocational rehabilitation program
and activities under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by title IV of
WIOA.
(11) The preparation of the annual reports described
in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 116(d) of the WIOA, 29 USC 3141(d).
(12) The development of the statewide workforce and
labor market information system described in section 15(e) of the Wagner-Peyser
Act, Public Law 73-30, as amended, 29 USC 49l–2(e).
(13) The development of other policies to promote
statewide objectives for, and enhance the performance of, the workforce
development system in the state.
(b) The Board must perform other functions and
responsibilities required of the Board under WIOA.
(c) When exercising its duties under this order,
the Board may provide policy advice across workforce areas, including
traditional adult workforce development, community colleges, career and
technical education, and workforce elements of economic development.
(d) The Board must actively participate in
convening Michigan’s workforce development system’s stakeholders, brokering
relations with a diverse range of employers, and leveraging support for
workforce development activities.
(e) As requested by the governor or the director
of the Department, the Board must advise the governor and the director of the
Department regarding policies in workforce development, adult education, career
and technical education, community colleges, and the workforce elements of
economic development. When exercising its duties under this order, the Board
must endeavor to develop a unified state policy dialogue involving local
workforce development boards, universities, community colleges, K-12 schools
and other key stakeholders.
(f) The Board must provide other information,
advice, or assistance as requested by the governor or the director of the
Department.
3. Board
Operations
(a) The Department must assist the Board in the
performance its duties and provide personnel to staff the Board. The budgeting,
procurement, and related management functions of the Board will be performed
under the direction and supervision of the director of the Department.
(b) The director of the Department must ensure
adequate representation of all core programs within the Department by
consulting regularly with each lead administrator for a core program within the
Department and providing each lead administrator an opportunity for input into
Michigan’s state plan or other workforce development policy efforts.
(c) The Board must adopt procedures consistent
with the WIOA, Michigan law, and this order governing its organization and
operations.
(d) A member of the Board may not vote by proxy.
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this order, a member of the Board may
not designate an alternate to participate in Board meetings during the member’s
absence.
(e) A member of the Board must not vote on a
matter under consideration by the Board regarding the provision of services, or
by an entity the member represents, or on a matter that would provide direct
financial benefit to the member or the immediate family of the member. A member
of the Board must not engage in any other activity determined by the governor
to constitute a conflict of interest, as specified in Michigan’s state plan.
(f) The Board must comply with the Freedom of
Information Act, 1976 PA 442, as amended, MCL 15.231 to 15.246.
(g) The Board must make available to the public on
a regular basis, through electronic means and open meetings information
regarding the activities of the Board, including information relating to
Michigan’s state plan, or a modification of Michigan’s state plan, before
submission of the state plan or modification, information regarding membership
of the Board, and upon request, minutes of the meetings of the Board.
(h) A majority of the members of the Board serving
constitutes a quorum for the transaction of the business of the Board. The
Board must act by a majority vote of its serving members.
(i) The Board must meet at the call of its
chairperson and as otherwise provided in procedures adopted by the Board.
(j) The Board must use technology, including
telecommunications and web-based meetings, to promote participation by Board
members.
(k) The Board may establish advisory workgroups
composed of individuals or entities participating in Board activities or other
members of the public as deemed necessary by the Board to assist the Board in
performing its duties and responsibilities. The Board may adopt, reject, or
modify any recommendations proposed by an advisory workgroup.
(l) The Board may, as appropriate, make
inquiries, studies, investigations, hold hearings, and receive comments from
the public. The Board may also consult with outside experts in order to perform
its duties, including, but not limited to, experts in the private sector,
organized labor, government agencies, and at institutions of higher education.
(m) Members of the Board must not receive
additional compensation for participation on the Body. Members of the Board may
receive reimbursement for necessary travel and expenses consistent with
applicable law, rules, and procedures, subject to available funding.
(n) The Board may hire or retain contractors,
sub-contractors, advisors, consultants, and agents, and may make and enter into
contracts necessary or incidental to the exercise of the powers of the Board
and the performance of its duties as the Director deems advisable and necessary,
in accordance with this order and applicable law, rules, and procedures,
subject to available funding.
(o) The Board may hire a director (the “Workforce
Development Board Director”) or other staff to assist the Board in carrying out
the functions described in section 2(a) using money available as described in
section 129(b)(3) or 134(a)(3)(B)(i) of the WIOA, 29 USC 3164(b)(3) or
3174(a)(3)(B)(i). Subject to any applicable rules or regulations of the Civil
Service Commission, the Board must establish a set of objective qualifications
for the position of Workforce Development Board Director, to ensure that the
individual selected as the Workforce Development Board Director has the
requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities to meet identified benchmarks and to
assist the Board in effectively carrying out the functions of the Board. The
Workforce Development Board Director and other Board staff described in this
section 3(o) are subject to the limitations on the payment of salary and
bonuses described in section 194(15) of the WIOA, 29 USC 3254(15).
(p) The Board may be funded with money available
under sections 129(b)(3) or 134(a)(3)(B) of the WIOA, 29 USC 3164(b)(3) or
3174(a)(3)(B), and non-federal money as appropriated and available for that
use.
(q) The Board may accept donations of labor,
services, or other things of value from any public or private agency or person.
Any donations must be received and used in accordance with law.
(r) Members of the Board must refer all legal,
legislative, and media contacts to the Department.
4. Rescission
of Executive Order 2015-11
(a) Executive Order 2015-11, as amended by
Executive Order 2018-13, is rescinded. The Michigan Future Talent Council is
abolished.
5. Definitions
(a) As used in this order:
(1) “Civil Service Commission” means the commission
provided for by section 5 of article 11 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963.
(2) “Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity”
means the principal department of state government created by Executive Order
2019-13, MCL 125.1998.
(3) “Michigan Economic Development Corporation”
means the public body corporate created pursuant to section 28 of article 7 of
the Michigan Constitution of 1963 and the Urban Cooperation Act of 1967, 1967
(Ex Sess) PA 7, as amended, MCL 124.501 to 124.512, between the Michigan
Strategic Fund and local participating economic development corporations formed
under the Economic Development Corporations Act, 1974 PA 338, as amended, MCL
125.1601 to 125.1636, dated April 5, 1999, as amended and restated.
(b) As used in this order, the following terms
have the meaning as defined in section 3 of the WIOA, 29 USC 3102: “adult”; “adult
education”; “career and technical education”; “career pathway”; “chief elected
official”; “core program”; “employment and training activity”; “in‑demand
industry sector or occupation”; “individuals with disabilities”; “industry or
sector partnership”; “local area”; “local board”; “one-stop”; “one-stop center”;
“one-stop operator”; “one-stop partner”; “one-stop partner program”; “planning region”;
“recognized postsecondary credential”; “region”; “state plan”; “supportive
services”; “training services”; “veteran”; “workforce development system”; “workforce
investment activity”; and “youth workforce investment activity.”
6. Implementation
(a) All
departments, agencies, committees, commissioners, or officers of this state, or
of any political subdivision of this state, must give to the Board, or to any
member or representative of the Board, any necessary assistance required by the
Board, or any member or representative of the Board, in the performance of the
duties of the Board so far as is compatible with its, his, or her duties. Free
access also must be given to any books, records, or documents in its, his, or
her custody relating to matters within the scope of inquiry, study, or review
of the Board.
(b) This order is not intended to abate a
proceeding commenced by, against, or before an entity affected by this order. A
proceeding may be maintained by, against, or before the successor of any entity
affected under this order.
(c) If any portion of this order is found to be
unenforceable, the rest of the order remains in effect.
(d) This order is effective upon signing.
Given under my hand and the great
seal of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 29, 2020
Time: 12:00 pm
[SEAL] GRETCHEN
WHITMER
GOVERNOR
By
the Governor:
JOCELYN
BENSON
SECRETARY
OF STATE
The message was referred to the
Clerk.
The following message from the Governor
was received May 29, 2020 and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-108
Temporary
restrictions on entry into health care facilities, residential care facilities,
congregate care facilities, and juvenile justice facilities
Rescission
of Executive Order 2020-72
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
is a respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is
caused by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and
easily spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or antiviral
treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department
of Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive
cases of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order
2020-4. This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan
under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the
Emergency Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq.,
and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945 PA 302, as amended
(EPGA), MCL 10.31 et seq.
Since then, the virus spread
across Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens
of thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and
educational, civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in
response to the widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed
by the COVID-19 pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded
on Executive Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of
disaster across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the
Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency
Powers of the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that
COVID-19 had created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of
Michigan, I issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency
declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as
Executive Order 2020-68 to issue new emergency and disaster declarations under
the Emergency Management Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of Representatives and Michigan Senate v
Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order
2020-67 is a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act but that Executive Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely
to be appealed.
On May 22, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a disaster
and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted a state
of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of
1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an
extension request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state
of disaster declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive
order. In relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of
emergency, “the governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and
regulations as he or she considers necessary to protect life and property or to
bring the emergency situation within the affected area under control.” MCL
10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the
ongoing litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned
or otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke Emergency Management Act as a
basis for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the
effects of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to preserve
the rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the governor with
broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or the people of
this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the governor may
implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives having the
force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order falls within
the scope of those powers and duties, and to the extent the governor may
declare a state of emergency and a state of disaster under the Emergency
Management Act when emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the legislature
has not granted an extension request, they too provide a sufficient legal basis
for this order.
To mitigate the spread of
COVID-19 and to provide essential protections to vulnerable Michiganders and to
this state’s health care system and other critical infrastructure, it is
reasonable and necessary to impose limited and temporary restrictions on the
entry of individuals into health care facilities, residential care facilities,
congregate care facilities, and juvenile justice facilities.
Executive Order 2020-72 imposed
such restrictions. In light of the ongoing risk to residents and employees of
those facilities, it is reasonable and necessary to extend the duration of
those restrictions, and empower the Director of the Department of Health and
Human Services to create exceptions to those restrictions as circumstances
permit. With this order, Executive Order 2020-72 is rescinded.
Acting under the Michigan
Constitution of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. Except as otherwise provided by the order of
the Director of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), all health
care facilities, residential care facilities, congregate care facilities, and
juvenile justice facilities must prohibit from entering their facilities any
visitors that: are not necessary for the provision of medical care, the support
of activities of daily living, or the exercise of power of attorney or
court-appointed guardianship for an individual under the facility’s care; are
not a parent, foster parent, prospective adoptive parent, or guardian of an
individual who is 21 years of age or under and who is under the facility’s care;
are not visiting an individual under the facility’s care that is in serious or
critical condition or in hospice care; and are not visiting under exigent
circumstances or for the purpose of performing official governmental functions.
2. All health care facilities, residential care
facilities, congregate care facilities, and juvenile justice facilities must
perform a health evaluation of all individuals that are not under the care of
the facility each time the individual seeks to enter the facility, and must
deny entry to those individuals who do not meet the evaluation criteria. The
evaluation criteria must include, at a minimum, symptoms of a respiratory
infection, such as fever, cough, or shortness of breath; contact in the last 14
days with someone with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19; and other criteria
specified by the Director of DHHS.
3. Any staff member or visitor of a residential
care facility, congregate care facility, or juvenile justice facility must wear
a covering over his or her nose and mouth when indoors or within six feet of
another person.
4. While the restrictions of this order are in
place, all health care facilities, residential care facilities, congregate care
facilities, and juvenile justice facilities must make best efforts to
facilitate visitations with individuals under their care by phone or other
electronic communication platforms to the fullest extent possible, consistent
with normal visitation policies.
5. For purposes of this order, “residential care
facilities” includes, but is not limited to, homes for the aged, nursing homes,
adult foster care facilities, hospice facilities, substance abuse disorder
residential facilities, independent living facilities, and assisted living
facilities.
6. The Director of DHHS may issue orders and
directives to implement this order, including to specify exceptions to section
1 of this order, and to specify additional evaluation criteria under section 2
of this order.
7. Consistent with MCL 10.33 and MCL 30.405(3), a
willful violation of this order shall constitute a misdemeanor.
8. Executive Order 2020-72 is rescinded.
9. This order is effective immediately and
continues through June 26, 2020 at 11:59 pm.
Given under my hand and the Great
Seal of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 29, 2020
Time: 8:11 pm
[SEAL] GRETCHEN
WHITMER
GOVERNOR
By
the Governor:
JOCELYN
BENSON
SECRETARY
OF STATE
The message was referred to the
Clerk.
The following message from the Governor
was received May 29, 2020 and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-109
Temporary
safety measures for food-selling establishments and pharmacies and temporary
relief from requirements applicable to the renewal of licenses for the
food-service industry
Rescission
of Executive Order 2020-71
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
is a respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is
caused by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and
easily spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department
of Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive
cases of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order
2020-4. This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan
under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the
Emergency Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq.,
and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945 PA 302, as amended
(EPGA), MCL 10.31 et seq.
Since then, the virus spread
across Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens
of thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and
educational, civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in
response to the widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed
by the COVID-19 pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded
on Executive Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of
disaster across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the
Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency
Powers of the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that COVID-19
had created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of Michigan, I
issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency declaration under the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive Order 2020-68 to
issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the Emergency Management
Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of Representatives and Michigan Senate v
Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order
2020-67 is a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act but that Executive Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely
to be appealed.
On May 22, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a disaster
and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted a state
of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of
1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an
extension request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state
of disaster declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive
order. In relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of
emergency, “the governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and
regulations as he or she considers necessary to protect life and property or to
bring the emergency situation within the affected area under control.” MCL
10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the
ongoing litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned
or otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke Emergency Management Act as a
basis for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the
effects of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to
preserve the rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the
governor with broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or
the people of this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the
governor may implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives
having the force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order
falls within the scope of those powers and duties, and to the extent the
governor may declare a state of emergency and a state of disaster under the
Emergency Management Act when emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the
legislature has not granted an extension request, they too provide a sufficient
legal basis for this order.
The COVID-19 pandemic has created
the risk of COVID-19 exposure in food-selling establishments and pharmacies.
Given the need to protect employees and the public from exposure to COVID-19,
it is necessary and reasonable to impose standards for food-selling establishments
and pharmacies to reduce the risk of COVID-19 exposure and disease
transmission. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed an immediate and
unprecedented strain on Michigan’s food service industries, local health
departments, and the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
(MDARD). Given the additional workload of local health departments and MDARD
due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and given these agencies’ statutorily defined
role in the renewal of licenses for the food service industry, it is also
necessary and reasonable to provide limited and temporary relief from certain
licensing requirements and regulations.
Executive Order 2020-71 provided
the protections and relief described above. This order extends and modifies
those protections and relief in light of current conditions, as it remains
necessary and reasonable to limit exposure to COVID-19 in food-selling
establishments.
With this order, Executive Order
2020-71 is rescinded.
Acting under the Michigan
Constitution of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. Any individual who enters a food-selling
establishment or pharmacy who is able to medically tolerate a face covering
must wear a covering over his or her nose and mouth, such as a homemade mask,
scarf, bandana, or handkerchief.
2. Grocery stores and pharmacies must create at
least two hours per week of dedicated shopping time for vulnerable populations,
which for purposes of this order are people over 60, pregnant people, and those
with chronic conditions, including heart disease, diabetes, and lung disease.
3. Food-selling establishments and pharmacies
must deploy strategies to reduce COVID-19 exposure for their customers and
employees consistent with the strategies described in Executive Order 2020‑97
or any order that follows from it, as well as the following:
(a) Provide access to handwashing facilities,
including those available in public restrooms;
(b) Require checkout employees to wear coverings
over their noses and mouths, such as homemade masks, scarves, bandanas, or
handkerchiefs;
(c) Allow employees sufficient break time to wash
hands as needed;
(d) Use best efforts to ensure checkout employees
to disinfect their hands between orders to prevent cross-contamination;
(e) Use best efforts to provide employees and
customers access to an alcohol-based hand sanitizer that contains at least 60%
alcohol, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC);
(f) Use best efforts to provide disinfecting
wipes at cash registers and entrance points for customers to disinfect carts
and baskets, as well as at other appropriate locations;
(g) Ensure that both employees and customers
remain at least six feet apart to the maximum extent possible, including during
employee breaks, for example by reviewing floor plans, creating temporary
barriers, designating aisles as one-way only, and demarcating queueing
distances;
(h) Close self-serve prepared food stations such
as salad bars;
(i) Eliminate free samples and tasting stations;
(j) Adopt procedures to meet the environmental cleaning
guidelines set by the CDC, including by cleaning and disinfecting frequent
touchpoints throughout the day such as point of sale terminals at registers,
shopping carts, and shopping baskets;
(k) Prohibit employees who are sick from reporting
to work and send employees home if they display symptoms of COVID-19. Employees
who test positive for COVID-19 or who display one or more of the principal
symptoms of COVID-19 should follow the procedures of Executive Order 2020-36 or
any order that follows from it;
(l) Accommodate employees who fall within a
vulnerable population by providing lower-exposure work assignments or giving
them the option to take an unpaid leave of absence with a return date coinciding
with the end of the declared states of emergency and disaster, or May 21,
2020, whichever is later. Nothing in this executive order abrogates any right
to disability benefits. Employees who take an unpaid leave of absence as
described in this subsection are encouraged to apply for unemployment benefits;
(m) Close to the public for sufficient time each
night to allow stores to be properly sanitized;
(n) Encourage cash transactions to be processed at
self-checkout kiosks when possible; and
(o) Develop and implement a daily screening
program, as described herein, for all staff upon or just prior to reporting to
work sites.
(1) The screening procedures must include the
following questions:
(A) Do you have any of the following symptoms?
(i) Fever of 100.4 degrees or higher (as measured
by a touchless thermometer if available, but a verbal confirmation of lack of
fever is sufficient if a touchless thermometer is not available);
(ii) Cough (excluding chronic cough due to a known
medical reason other than COVID-19);
(iii) Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing; or
(iv) Sore throat.
(B) Have you travelled internationally or outside
of Michigan in the last 14 days, excluding commuting from a home location
outside of Michigan? For purposes of this order, commuting is defined as
traveling between one’s home and work on a regular basis.
(C) Have you had any close contact in the last 14
days with someone with a diagnosis of COVID-19?
(2) Any affirmative response to screening
questions (1)(A) or (B) above requires the individual to be excluded:
(A) For at least 72 hours with no fever (three full
days of no fever without use of medicine that reduces fever) and other symptoms
have improved (for example, when cough and shortness of breath have improved)
and at least seven days have passed since symptoms first appeared.
(B) Except for necessary workers engaged in travel
related to supply chain and critical infrastructure, for 14 days following
travel unless that travel was due to commuting from a home location outside of
Michigan.
(3) An employee who provides an affirmative
response to screening question (1)(C) may be allowed to continue work at the
employer’s discretion provided they remain asymptomatic and the employer
implements the following additional precautions to protect the employee and the
community:
(A) Employers should measure the employee’s
temperature and assess symptoms each day before they start work. Ideally,
temperature checks should happen before the individual enters the facility. A
touchless thermometer, or a dedicated thermometer for the employee if not
touchless, should be used. Sharing of any thermometer other than a touchless
thermometer is strictly prohibited.
(B) As long as the employee does not have a fever
or other symptoms, they should self-monitor under the supervision of their
employer’s occupational health program or other programs in place to protect
employee health and safety.
(C) If the employee begins to experience symptoms during the day, they
should be sent home immediately.
(D) The employee should wear a face mask at all
times while in the workplace for 14 days after last exposure. Employers can
issue facemasks or can approve employees’ supplied cloth face coverings in the
event of shortages.
(E) The employee should maintain at least six feet
of distance from other people as work duties permit.
(F) Beyond standard cleaning protocol, clean and
disinfect all areas such as offices, bathrooms, common areas, and shared
electronic equipment routinely known to be impacted by the exposed employee for
14 days after last exposure.
(4) Nothing in this section limits the operations
of first responders, health care institutions, public health functions,
pharmacies, and other entities that are involved in the mitigation of risk
during this pandemic.
4. Vendors moving between food-selling
establishments must frequently clean and disinfect frequent touch points.
5. If an employee at a food-selling establishment
tests positive for COVID-19, the establishment must notify food vendors and
other employees of the positive test result as soon as possible and in no case
later than 12 hours after receiving the test result, without revealing the
personal health-related information of any employee.
6. Strict compliance with sections 3119, 4109,
4113, and 4115 of the Food Law, 92 PA 2000, as amended, MCL 289.3119, MCL
289.4109, MCL 289.4113, and MCL 289.4115, is temporarily suspended to the
extent necessary to extend the deadline for local health departments to submit
fees under section 3119, and to extend the license and registration expiration
dates under sections 4109 and 4115, until 60 days after the end of the declared
states of emergency and disaster. Furthermore, late fees shall not be assessed
under sections 4113 or 4115 during the 2020–2021 license year.
7. Strict compliance with subsection 6137 of the
Food Law, MCL 289.6137, is suspended to the extent necessary to make a license holder eligible for a special transitory
temporary food unit for the 2020–2021 licensing year, even if the
license holder received only 1 evaluation during the 2019–2020 licensing year.
8. For the purposes of this order, “food-selling
establishments” means grocery stores, convenience stores, restaurants that sell
groceries or food available for takeout, and any other business that sells
food.
9. Consistent with MCL 10.33 and MCL 30.405(3), a
willful violation of this order, excepting section 1 of this order, is a
misdemeanor.
10. This order is effective immediately and
continues through June 12, 2020.
11. Executive Order 2020-71 is rescinded.
Given under my hand and the Great
Seal of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 29, 2020
Time: 8:12 pm
[SEAL] GRETCHEN
WHITMER
GOVERNOR
By
the Governor:
JOCELYN
BENSON
SECRETARY
OF STATE
The message was referred to the
Clerk.
The following message from the Governor
was received June 1, 2020 and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-110
Temporary
restrictions on certain events, gatherings, and businesses
Rescission
of Executive Orders 2020-69 and 2020-96
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
is a respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is
caused by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and
easily spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department
of Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive
cases of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order
2020-4. This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan
under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency
Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq., and the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945 PA 302, as amended (EPGA),
MCL 10.31 et seq.
Since then, the virus spread
across Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens
of thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and
educational, civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in
response to the widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed
by the COVID-19 pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded
on Executive Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of
disaster across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the
Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency
Powers of the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that
COVID-19 had created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of
Michigan, I issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency
declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive
Order 2020-68 to issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the
Emergency Management Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of Representatives and Michigan Senate v
Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order
2020-67 is a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act but that Executive Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Management Act. Both of those rulings are being
challenged on appeal.
On May 22, 2020, I issued
Executive Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a
disaster and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted
a state of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act
of 1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an
extension request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state
of disaster declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive
order. In relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of
emergency, “the governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and
regulations as he or she considers necessary to protect life and property or to
bring the emergency situation within the affected area under control.” MCL
10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the
ongoing litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned
or otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke the Emergency Management Act as a
basis for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the
effects of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to
preserve the rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the governor
with broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or the
people of this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the governor
may implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives having
the force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order falls
within the scope of those powers and duties, and to the extent the governor may
declare a state of emergency and a state of disaster under the Emergency
Management Act when emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the legislature
has not granted an extension request, they too provide a sufficient legal basis
for this order.
To suppress the spread of
COVID-19, to prevent the state’s health care system from being overwhelmed, to
allow time for the production of critical test kits, ventilators, and personal
protective equipment, to establish the public health infrastructure necessary
to contain the spread of infection, and to avoid needless deaths, it was
reasonable and necessary to direct residents to remain at home or in their
place of residence to the maximum extent feasible. To that end, on March 23,
2020, I issued Executive Order 2020-21, ordering all people in Michigan to stay
home and stay safe. In Executive Orders 2020-42, 2020-59, 2020-70, 2020‑77,
2020-92, and 2020-96, I extended that initial order, modifying its scope as
needed and appropriate to match the ever-changing circumstances presented by
this pandemic.
The measures put in place by
these executive orders have been effective: the number of new confirmed cases
each day continues to drop. Although the virus remains aggressive and
persistent—on May 31, 2020, Michigan reported 57,397 confirmed cases and 5,491
deaths—the strain on our health care system has begun to relent, even as our testing
capacity has increased. We are now in the process of gradually resuming in‑person
work and activities. In so doing, however, we must move with care, patience,
and vigilance, recognizing the grave harm that this virus continues to inflict
on our state and how quickly our progress in suppressing it can be undone.
With this order, I find it reasonable
and necessary to move the state to Stage 4 of the Michigan Safe Start Plan. As
a result, Michiganders are no longer required to stay home. Instead, certain
businesses will remain closed and specific activities that present a heightened
risk of infection will remain prohibited. Any work that is capable of being
performed remotely must be performed remotely.
Under this order, retailers will
be allowed to resume operations on June 4. Restaurants and bars may reopen
fully on June 8. Swimming pools and day camps for kids will also be permitted
to reopen on the same day. Those businesses and activities will be subject to
safety guidance to mitigate the risk of infection. Other businesses and
activities that necessarily involve close contact and shared surfaces,
including gyms, hair salons, indoor theaters, tattoo parlors, casinos, and
similar establishments, will remain closed for the time being.
Michiganders must continue to
wear face coverings when in enclosed public spaces and should continue to take
all reasonable precautions to protect themselves, their co-workers, their loved
ones, and their communities. Indoor social gatherings and events of more than
10 people are prohibited. Outdoor social gatherings and events are permitted so
long as people maintain six feet of distance from one another and the
assemblage consists of no more than 100 people.
Acting under the Michigan
Constitution of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. For purposes of this order, Michigan comprises
eight separate regions.
(a) Region 1 includes the following counties:
Monroe, Washtenaw, Livingston, Genesee, Lapeer, Saint Clair, Oakland, Macomb,
and Wayne.
(b) Region 2 includes the following counties:
Mason, Lake, Osceola, Clare, Oceana, Newaygo, Mecosta, Isabella, Muskegon,
Montcalm, Ottawa, Kent, and Ionia.
(c) Region 3 includes the following counties:
Allegan, Barry, Van Buren, Kalamazoo, Calhoun, Berrien, Cass, Saint Joseph, and
Branch.
(d) Region 4 includes the following counties:
Oscoda, Alcona, Ogemaw, Iosco, Gladwin, Arenac, Midland, Bay, Saginaw, Tuscola,
Sanilac, and Huron.
(e) Region 5 includes the following counties:
Gratiot, Clinton, Shiawassee, Eaton, and Ingham.
(f) Region 6 includes the following counties:
Manistee, Wexford, Missaukee, Roscommon, Benzie, Grand Traverse, Kalkaska,
Crawford, Leelanau, Antrim, Otsego, Montmorency, Alpena, Charlevoix, Cheboygan,
Presque Isle, and Emmet.
(g) Region 7 includes the following counties:
Hillsdale, Lenawee, and Jackson.
(h) Region 8 includes the following counties:
Gogebic, Ontonagon, Houghton, Keweenaw, Iron, Baraga, Dickinson, Marquette,
Menominee, Delta, Alger, Schoolcraft, Luce, Mackinac, and Chippewa.
2. Any work that is capable of being performed
remotely (i.e., without the worker leaving his or her home or place of
residence) must be performed remotely.
3. Any business or operation that requires its
employees to leave their home or place of residence for work is subject to the
rules on workplace safeguards in Executive Order 2020-97 or any order that may
follow from it.
4. Any individual who leaves his or her home or
place of residence must:
(a) Follow social distancing measures recommended
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), including remaining
at least six feet from people from outside the individual’s household to the
extent feasible under the circumstances.
(b) Wear a face covering over his or her nose and
mouth—such as a homemade mask, scarf, bandana, or handkerchief—when in any enclosed
public space, unless the individual is unable medically to tolerate a face
covering.
(1) An individual may be required to temporarily
remove a face covering upon entering an enclosed public space for
identification purposes. An individual may also remove a face covering to eat
or drink when seated at a restaurant or bar.
(2) Businesses and building owners, and those
authorized to act on their behalf, are permitted to deny entry or access to any
individual who refuses to comply with the rule in this subsection (b).
Businesses and building owners will not be subject to a claim that they have
violated the covenant of quiet enjoyment, to a claim of frustration of purpose,
or to similar claims for denying entry or access to a person who refuses to
comply with this subsection (b).
(3) Supplies of N95 masks and surgical masks
should generally be reserved, for now, for health care professionals, first
responders (e.g., police officers, fire fighters, paramedics), and other
critical workers who interact with the public.
(4) The protections against discrimination in the
Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, 1976 PA 453, as amended, MCL 37.2101 et seq.,
and any other protections against discrimination in Michigan law, apply in full
force to individuals who wear a face covering under this order.
5. Indoor social gatherings and events among
persons not part of a single household are permitted, but may not exceed 10
people.
6. Outdoor social gatherings and events among
persons not part of a single household are permitted, but only to the extent
that:
(a) The gathering or event does not exceed 100
people, and
(b) People not part of the same household maintain
six feet of distance from one another.
7. Unless otherwise prohibited by local
regulation, outdoor parks and recreational facilities may be open, provided
that they make any reasonable modifications necessary to enable employees and
patrons not part of the same household to maintain six feet of distance from
one another, and provided that areas in which social distancing cannot be
maintained be closed, subject to guidance issued by the Department of Health
and Human Services.
8. Unless otherwise prohibited by local
regulation, public swimming pools, as defined by MCL 333.12521(d), may open as
of June 8, 2020, provided that they are outdoors and limit capacity to 50% of
the bather capacity limits described in Rule 325.2193 of the Michigan
Administrative Code, and subject to guidance issued by the Department of Health
and Human Services. Indoor public swimming pools must remain closed.
9. Day camps for children, as defined by Rule
400.11101(i) of the Michigan Administrative Code, may open as of June 8, 2020,
subject to guidance issued by the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.
Residential, travel, and troop camps within the meaning of Rule 400.11101(n),
(p), or (q) of the Michigan Administrative Code must remain closed for the time
being.
10. Unless otherwise prohibited by local
regulation, libraries and museums may open as of June 8, 2020, subject to the
rules governing retail stores described in Executive Order 2020-97 or any order
that may follow from it.
11. Stores that were closed under Executive Order
2020-96 (or that were open only by appointment under the same order) must
remain closed to the public (or open only by appointment) until June 4 at 12:01
am. Such stores may then resume normal operations, subject to local regulation
and to the capacity constraints and workplace standards described in Executive
Order 2020-97 or any order that may follow from it.
12. Subject to the exceptions in section 14, the
following places are closed to ingress, egress, use, and occupancy by members
of the public:
(a) Indoor theaters, cinemas, and performance
venues.
(b) Indoor gymnasiums, fitness centers, recreation
centers, sports facilities, exercise facilities, exercise studios, and the
like.
(c) Facilities offering non-essential personal
care services, including hair, nail, tanning, massage, traditional spa, tattoo,
body art, and piercing services, and similar personal care services that
involve close contact of persons.
(d) Casinos licensed by the Michigan Gaming
Control Board, racetracks licensed by the Michigan Gaming Control Board, and
Millionaire Parties licensed by the Michigan Gaming Control Board.
(e) Indoor services or facilities, or outdoor
services or facilities involving close contact of persons, for amusement or
other recreational or entertainment purposes, such as amusement parks, arcades,
bingo halls, bowling alleys, indoor climbing facilities, indoor dance areas,
skating rinks, trampoline parks, and other similar recreational or
entertainment facilities.
13. Unless otherwise prohibited by local
regulation, restaurants, food courts, cafes, coffeehouses, bars, taverns, brew
pubs, breweries, microbreweries, distilleries, wineries, tasting rooms, special
licensees, clubs, and like places may be open to the public as follows:
(a) For delivery service, window service, walk-up
service, drive-through service, or drive-up service, and may permit up to five
members of the public at one time for the purpose of picking up their food or
beverage orders, so long as those individuals are at least six feet apart from
one another while on premises.
(b) In Regions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, beginning at
12:01 am on June 8, 2020, for outdoor and indoor seating, subject to the
capacity constraints and workplace standards described in Executive Order
2020-97 or any order that may follow from it.
(c) In Regions 6 and 8, for outdoor and indoor
seating, subject to the capacity constraints and workplace standards described
in Executive Order 2020-97 or any order that may follow from it.
14. The restrictions imposed by sections 12 and 13
of this order do not apply to any of the following:
(a) Outdoor fitness classes, athletic practices,
training sessions, or games, provided that coaches, spectators, and
participants not from the same household maintain six feet of distance from one
another at all times during such activities, and that equipment and supplies
are shared to the minimum extent possible and are subject to frequent and
thorough disinfection and cleaning.
(b) Services necessary for medical treatment as
determined by a licensed medical provider.
(c) Health care facilities, residential care
facilities, congregate care facilities, and juvenile justice facilities.
(d) Crisis shelters or similar institutions.
(e) Food courts inside the secured zones of
airports.
(f) Employees, contractors, vendors, or suppliers
who enter, use, or occupy the places described in section 12 of this order in
their professional capacity.
15. Nothing in this order should be taken to
interfere with or infringe on the powers of the legislative and judicial
branches to perform their constitutional duties or exercise their authority.
Similarly, nothing in this order shall be taken to abridge protections
guaranteed by the state or federal constitution under these emergency
circumstances.
16. Consistent with prior guidance, neither a place
of religious worship nor its owner is subject to penalty under section 19 of
this order for allowing religious worship at such place. No individual is
subject to penalty under section 19 of this order for engaging in religious
worship at a place of religious worship, or for violating the face covering
requirement of section 4(b) of this order.
17. Executive Orders 2020-69 and 2020-96 are
rescinded. Except as specified, nothing in this order supersedes any other
executive order. This order takes effect immediately unless otherwise
specified.
18. In determining whether to maintain, intensify,
or relax the restrictions in this order, I will consider, among other things,
(1) data on COVID-19 infections and the disease’s rate of spread; (2) whether
sufficient medical personnel, hospital beds, and ventilators exist to meet
anticipated medical need; (3) the availability of personal protective equipment
for the health care workforce; (4) the state’s capacity to test for COVID-19
cases and isolate infected people; and (5) economic conditions in the state.
19. Consistent with MCL 10.33 and MCL 30.405(3), a
willful violation of this order is a misdemeanor.
Given under my hand and the Great
Seal of the State of Michigan.
Date: June 1, 2020
Time: 2:27 pm
[SEAL] GRETCHEN
WHITMER
GOVERNOR
By
the Governor:
JOCELYN
BENSON
SECRETARY
OF STATE
The message was referred to the
Clerk.
The following message from the Governor
was received June 1, 2020 and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-111
Protecting
the Food Supply and Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Workers from the effects
of COVID-19
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
is a respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is
caused by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and
easily spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department
of Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive
cases of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order
2020-4. This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan
under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the
Emergency Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq.,
and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945 PA 302, as amended
(EPGA), MCL 10.31 et seq.
Since then, the virus spread
across Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens
of thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and
educational, civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in
response to the widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed
by the COVID-19 pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded
on Executive Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of
disaster across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the
Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency
Powers of the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that
COVID-19 had created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of
Michigan, I issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency declaration
under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive Order
2020-68 to issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the Emergency
Management Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of Representatives and Michigan Senate v
Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order
2020-67 is a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act but that Executive Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely
to be appealed.
On May 22, 2020, I issued
Executive Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a
disaster and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted
a state of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act
of 1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an
extension request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state
of disaster declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the
Governor Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive
order. In relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of
emergency, “the governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and
regulations as he or she considers necessary to protect life and property or to
bring the emergency situation within the affected area under control.” MCL
10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the
ongoing litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned
or otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke Emergency Management Act as a basis
for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the effects
of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to preserve the
rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the governor with
broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or the people of
this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the governor may
implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives having the
force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order falls within
the scope of those powers and duties, and to the extent the governor may
declare a state of emergency and a state of disaster under the Emergency
Management Act when emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the legislature
has not granted an extension request, they too provide a sufficient legal basis
for this order.
COVID-19 can spread easily in
setting when many people live in close proximity, such as the migrant housing
camps that house thousands of migrant agricultural workers in Michigan each
year. Migrant agricultural workers are an essential workforce in Michigan and
securing their health and well-being will ensure that Michigan’s food supply
chain is not disrupted.
Taking preventive measures now
will save lives and keep the state’s agricultural sector running smoothly and
consistently. Those who provide housing for Michigan’s migrant agricultural
workers must implement plans to prevent exposure to the novel coronavirus that
causes COVID-19, care for individuals with COVID‑19, and prevent the
spread of disease among their workers based on this directive. The state must
take proactive, preventive measures to create safer living conditions for
migrant workers.
Thus, to ensure the safety of
migrant workers as well as the sustainability of Michigan’s food supply, it is
reasonable and necessary to create temporary new requirements relating to the
housing and working conditions of migrant and seasonal agricultural workers in
the state during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Acting under the Michigan
Constitution of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. All owners and operators of employer-provided
migrant housing camps licensed by the Michigan Department of Agriculture and
Rural Development (“camps”) must comply with section 1 of Executive Order
2020-97 or any order that follows it, providing camp residents with the same
safeguards as businesses are required to provide their workers while at work.
Within two weeks of the effective date of this order, a camp must post its
COVID-19 preparedness and response plan, consistent with recommendations in
Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19, developed by the Occupational
Health and Safety Administration and available at https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3990.pdf.
2. In addition to section 1, all camp owners and
operators must, at a minimum:
(a) Separate beds by at least six feet or more in
all directions wherever possible, and encourage camp residents to sleep
head-to-toe.
(b) Provide isolation housing for
COVID-19-suspected residents who have not received a positive result from a
COVID-19 test, unless the COVID-19-suspected resident resides in a one-family
housing unit or in a family living unit that is part of a multifamily unit and
can effectively isolate themselves within the unit.
(c) Provide housing, dining, and bathroom
facilities for COVID-19-confirmed residents separate from residents who are not
COVID-19-confirmed. Such facilities may be shared with other COVID-19-confirmed
residents.
(d) Ensure regular ventilation of rooms where
COVID-19-suspected residents are housed (e.g., by opening screened windows to
the outside to let fresh air circulate).
(e) Ensure that anyone who delivers food and water
to isolated residents is equipped with appropriate PPE.
(f) Arrange for COVID-19-suspected and
COVID-19-confirmed residents to be evaluated by a medical provider through the
local health department or federally qualified health center.
(g) Attempt to collect emergency contact numbers
for each worker.
(h) Ensure that camp employees and residents have
access to the phone number of the local health department. MiOSHA requires “camp
superintendents” (or those providing the housing) to report immediately to the
local health officer the name and address of any individual in the camp known
to have or suspected of having a communicable disease. (29 CFR 1910.142(l)(1)).
Additionally, camp owners and operators must ensure that the name, phone
number, and email address of the camp superintendents is posted prominently in
a central location.
(i) Conspicuously post workers’ housing address
in a central location to ensure that workers will be able to call a 911
operator if needed.
(j) Conspicuously post the phone number for the
Michigan Coronavirus hotline, 888-535-6136, and include on the posting a
statement that if workers would like to make a CONFIDENTIAL complaint about
unsafe working or employer provided living conditions, they may call the
hotline number.
(k) Adopt any additional infection control
measures consistent with guidance issued by the Department of Health and Human
Services (“DHHS”).
3. MDARD must use best efforts to conduct
outreach visits to each migrant labor housing camp licensed under Part 124 of
the Public Health Code within 20 working days of occupant arrival to review the
rules issued pursuant to this order and any relevant DHHS guidance. MDARD may
contract with third-party providers to provide these services.
4. Definitions.
(a) “COVID-19-suspected resident” includes a camp
resident who has symptoms of COVID-19 (e.g., fever, cough, shortness of breath)
but has not yet received a COVID-19 diagnostic test result.
(b) “COVID-19-confirmed resident” includes a camp
resident who has received a positive result from a COVID-19 diagnostic test and
has not subsequently discontinued transmission-based precautions based on a
strategy outlined by the CDC. A description of the CDC recommendations for discontinuation
of transmission-based precautions may be accessed at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/disposition-hospitalized-patients.html.
5. The rules described in sections 1 and 2 have
the status of regulations adopted by the Michigan Department of Agriculture and
Rural Development (“MDARD”). Any challenge to civil or criminal penalties
imposed by MDARD for violating any of the rules described in sections 1 and 2
will proceed through the same administrative review process as any challenge to
a civil or criminal penalty imposed by the department or agency for a violation
of its own rules.
6. Consistent with MCL 10.33 and MCL 30.405(3), a
willful violation of this order is a misdemeanor.
7. This order is effective upon issuance and
remains effective through June 29, 2020 at 11:59 p.m.
Given under my hand and the Great
Seal of the State of Michigan.
Date: June 1, 2020
Time: 8:53 pm
[SEAL] GRETCHEN
WHITMER
GOVERNOR
By
the Governor:
JOCELYN
BENSON
SECRETARY
OF STATE
The message was referred to the
Clerk.
Reps. Ellison, Lower and Markkanen
introduced
House Bill No. 5824, entitled
A bill to amend 1911 PA 44, entitled “An act to create
a state board of equalization; to prescribe its powers and duties; to provide
that said board shall be furnished with certain information by the several
boards of supervisors and by the state tax commission; to provide for meeting
the expense authorized by this act, and to repeal all acts or parts of acts
contravening the provisions of this act,” by amending section 5 (MCL 209.5), as
amended by 2001 PA 36.
The bill was read a first time by its title and
referred to the Committee on Local Government and Municipal Finance.
Reps. Markkanen, Lower and Ellison introduced
House Bill No. 5825, entitled
A bill to amend 1893 PA 206, entitled “The general property tax act,”
(MCL 211.1 to 211.155) by adding section 33a.
The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the
Committee on Local Government and Municipal Finance.
Reps. Cherry, Stone, Shannon, Kuppa, Chirkun, Garrett,
Tyrone Carter, Hammoud, Garza, Peterson, Clemente, Lasinski, Warren, Kennedy,
Sneller, Ellison, Witwer, Pohutsky, Koleszar, Brixie, Tate, Hood, Guerra and
Rabhi introduced
House Bill No. 5826, entitled
A bill to make, supplement, and adjust appropriations
for various state departments and agencies for the fiscal year ending September
30, 2020; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.
The bill was read a first time by its title and
referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
______
The
Clerk declared the House adjourned until Wednesday, June 3, at 1:30 p.m.
GARY L. RANDALL
Clerk of the House of
Representatives